Advanced Search Results
Ramjit and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-12-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 324
2009CriLJ1139; JT2009(1)SC342; 2009(1)SCALE446; (2009)11SCC373; 2009AIRSCW618; 2009(2)LHSC875
under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 307 read with Section 149 and Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. In all five persons had filed the appeal. During pendency of the appeal before
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState by Sub-inspector of Police Vs. Cauverappa and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-28-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 342, 366 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 428
ILR2008KAR74; 2007(5)KarLJ104; 2007(4)AIRKarR651
been acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections 366, 342 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. The essential facts of the case leading up to this appeal with reference to the rank of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBihari Nath Goswami Vs. Shiv Kumar Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-24-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302 and 364
2004(1)BLJR664; 2004(2)SCALE671; (2004)9SCC186
No. 37/1993 found the respondent guilty for the offence punishable under Section 364 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC.2. Once Madan Singh who was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangoo @ Mangal Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-24-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 300, 302 and 304; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 136
2008(10)SCALE493; (2008)8SCC283; (2008)3SCC(Cri)487.
follows:Five persons faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial Court convicted all the five accused persons including the appellant in this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNetraj Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149 and 302
AIR2008SC14; 2007(4)SCALE601; 2007AIRSCW6007; (2007)2Crimes402(SC)
Narsinghpur. Appellant was tried for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The trial Court found the evidence to be inadequate and held the accused-appellant not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka Vs. Chikkahottappa @ Varade Gowda and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-16-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 143, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 326
AIR2008SC2692; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)868; 2008CriLJ3495; 2008(5)KarLJ369; 2008(2)LC877(SC); 2008AIRSCW4497
by the respondent who were convicted for offence punishable under Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). By the impugned judgment the High Court held that the respondents were to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMummidi Hemadri and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Mar-16-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304 and 506
AIR2007SC2528; JT2007(4)SC356; 2007(4)SCALE431; 2007(1)LC398(SC); (2007)2Crimes389(SC); 2007AIRSCW4507
conviction of the appellants for the offence punishable under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').3. In all, six accused persons faced trial. The present appeal is by accused 2,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-20-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 326 and 504
2009(1)KarLJ85; 2008(11)SCALE567; 2008AIRSCW6007; 2008(3)Crimes406; 2008(5)LH(SC)3707; 2008(6)AIRKarR222
questioning acquittal of the accused persons for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The other appeals were filed by the accused persons who were convicted for offences
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhupendra Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 366 and 376
AIR2009SC3265; 2009(57)BLJR1885; JT2009(6)SC79; 2009(5)SCALE653; (2009)12SCC447; 2009(5)LC2383(SC); 2009AIRSCW3304
conviction for offence punishable under Sections 147, 302 read with Sections 149, 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Four of the accused persons namely Bishin Singh, Nathu Singh, Yatinder Singh and Kundan
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPogula Komuraiah Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Prosecutor
Supreme Court of India
Jan-15-2008
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149 to 304, 324 and 448
AIR2008SC1226; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)589; 2008CriLJ1644; 2008(1)SCALE388; (2008)3SCC686; 2008AIRSCW1221; AIR2008SC1226; (2008)2SCC(Cri)718; 2008(1)Crimes253; 2008(1)SCALE388.
448 read with Section 149 and Section 302 read with Section 149, 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC').4. The High Court by the impugned order disposed of the appeals with the following observations:In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »