Advanced Search Results
State of Maharashtra Vs. L.D. Kanchan and Others
Mumbai
Nov-03-1988
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1 and 2); Banking Regulation Act - Sections 46A and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 14 and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Amendment Act, 1980; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21(12) and 161
1989(1)BomCR59; [1991]72CompCas632(Bom)
be a public servant, i.e., for the purpose of Chapter IX, Indian Penal Code, Act No. 45 of 1860 section 14 repeats the deeming being restricted to Chapter IX of the Indian Penal Code. The reply given on behalf … a nationalised bank is not a 'public servant' within the meaning of clause (12)(b) of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are quashed and set aside. Rule in each of the criminal revision application is, accordingly, made absolute. Company
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociation of Dead People, Azamgarh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and ...
Allahabad
Jan-07-2000
Constitution
Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 14 and 36(3); Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200
2000(1)AWC663
its true state, it is an offence against public justice the like of which is referred to in the Indian Penal Code, 1860. All such persons who may have arranged for these crimes are liable to be charged with complaints before … of which has been provided in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and specially provided for under Section 14. The matter has ceased to be an Individual case as prima facie it has been accepted by learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Zavad Zama Khan
Supreme Court of India
May-04-1984
Criminal
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 14; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302;
AIR1984SC1095; 1984CriLJ922; 1984(2)Crimes1(SC); 1984(1)SCALE938; (1984)3SCC505; [1984]3SCR789; 1984(16)LC964(SC)
offence of murder punishable under Section 302 and of causing disappearance of evidence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in connection with the communal riots that occurred in the Moradabad city. On November 6, 1982, the District … 1983 the respondent through his counsel D.S. Misra simultaneously addressed two representations for revocation of his detention under Section 14 of the Act, one addressed to the Prime Minister of India and the other to the State Government.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Daroga Singh and ors. Vs. B.K. Pandey
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2004
Criminal
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2); Commission of Inquiries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Evidence Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 228, 302, 201/34 and 499; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 235; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 349
2004(52)BLJR1162; 2004CriLJ2084; JT2004(1)SC608; 2004(4)SCALE554; (2004)5SCC26
request. Criminal - Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Section 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 228 - Power and jurisdiction of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate Courts - Non
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Kumar Koushal and anr. Vs. Naz Foundation and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-11-2013
MRTP
respondent No.1 herein, by way of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in the following terms:“We declare that Section 377 IPC, insofar it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults … appearing on behalf of the appellants that only because Section 13 of the repealed Act is inconsistent with Section 14 of the 2003 Act, the same would be arbitrary by reason of being discriminatory in nature and ultra
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-26-2004
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1
AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383
set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … sexual abuse law and denies majority of women and children access to adequate redress in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution. Statistics and figures indicate that sexual abuse of children, particularly minor girl, children
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHira Lal and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Jul-25-2003
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 34, 304(2), 304B, 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2
AIR2003SC2865; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)184; 2003CriLJ3711; 105(2003)DLT705(SC); II(2003)DMC206SC; 2003(69)DRJ714; JT2003(7)SC596; RLW2003(4)SC541; 2003(5)SCALE445; (2003)8SCC80; 200
life. Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act 1986 brought about sweeping change sin the penal statutes, and Sections 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Section 113B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') came … Act') came to be enforced.3. One Sarita (hereinafter referred to as 'deceased') committed suicide by consuming poison on 14.4.1999. She was married to accused Surrender on 26.11.1995. Other appellants Hiralal and Angoori Devi were her father-in-law and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPramod Kumar Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-2008
Constitution
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 436A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 32 and 142
IV(2008)BC505(SC); 2008CriLJ4697; [2009(1)JCR79(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE623; (2008)9SCC685; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(9)SCC685; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528
different States for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and also under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.5. According to the petitioner, there is … years i.e. since August, 1998. He has approached this Court for enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India.4. It is the case of the petitioner that he
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Bansi Dhar and ors.
Delhi
Jul-31-2013
Criminal
Trial court convicted the three respondents and held them guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and all the three respondents were sentenced individually for the period already undergone … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the State under Section 377(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as, Cr.P.C.) for enhancing the sentence awarded … instance of the eye-witness, Sh. Suresh Sharma, his statement was recorded. On 14.7.1995, the injured, Sh. Raj Kumar, was found fit for making a statement,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Director, Enforcement Directorate (Fera) Ministry of Finance ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-19-1996
FERACriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164(2 and 3), 463; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 9(1), 35, 37, 40 and 56; Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Sea Customs Act - Sections 167(81) and 171-A; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25 and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21
1998(4)ALD540; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)272; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)552; [1999]96CompCas745(AP)
aforesaid shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).' 10. It is clear from perusal of the above provision that any Gazetted Officer of … giving a caution or warning as contemplated under Section 164(2) Cr.PC in pursuance of the summons issued under Section 14 of the Central Excise and Salt Act are inadmissible in evidence; and relying on these decisions, the trial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »