Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 14 · Page 1 of about 9,232 results (0.135 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 03 1988

State of Maharashtra Vs. L.D. Kanchan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-03-1988

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1 and 2); Banking Regulation Act - Sections 46A and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 14 and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Amendment Act, 1980; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21(12) and 161

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR59; [1991]72CompCas632(Bom)

be a public servant, i.e., for the purpose of Chapter IX, Indian Penal Code, Act No. 45 of 1860 section 14 repeats the deeming being restricted to Chapter IX of the Indian Penal Code. The reply given on behalf … a nationalised bank is not a 'public servant' within the meaning of clause (12)(b) of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are quashed and set aside. Rule in each of the criminal revision application is, accordingly, made absolute. Company

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2000

Association of Dead People, Azamgarh and Another Vs. State of U.P. and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-07-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Sections 14 and 36(3); Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC663

its true state, it is an offence against public justice the like of which is referred to in the Indian Penal Code, 1860. All such persons who may have arranged for these crimes are liable to be charged with complaints before … of which has been provided in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and specially provided for under Section 14. The matter has ceased to be an Individual case as prima facie it has been accepted by learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 1984

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Zavad Zama Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 14; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302;

Reported in : AIR1984SC1095; 1984CriLJ922; 1984(2)Crimes1(SC); 1984(1)SCALE938; (1984)3SCC505; [1984]3SCR789; 1984(16)LC964(SC)

offence of murder punishable under Section 302 and of causing disappearance of evidence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in connection with the communal riots that occurred in the Moradabad city. On November 6, 1982, the District … 1983 the respondent through his counsel D.S. Misra simultaneously addressed two representations for revocation of his detention under Section 14 of the Act, one addressed to the Prime Minister of India and the other to the State Government.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 13 2004

Daroga Singh and ors. Vs. B.K. Pandey

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2); Commission of Inquiries Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Evidence Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 228, 302, 201/34 and 499; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 235; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 349

Reported in : 2004(52)BLJR1162; 2004CriLJ2084; JT2004(1)SC608; 2004(4)SCALE554; (2004)5SCC26

request. Criminal - Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Section 2, 2(3), 9, 10, 14 and 15(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 228 - Power and jurisdiction of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate Courts - Non

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2013

Suresh Kumar Koushal and anr. Vs. Naz Foundation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-2013

Subject : MRTP

respondent No.1 herein, by way of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in the following terms:“We declare that Section 377 IPC, insofar it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults … appearing on behalf of the appellants that only because Section 13 of the repealed Act is inconsistent with Section 14 of the 2003 Act, the same would be arbitrary by reason of being discriminatory in nature and ultra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2004

Sakshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-26-2004

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15(3), 17, 18, 19, 20(1), 21 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 375, 376, 376(2), 376A to 376D, 377, 506 and 511; ;Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 2; ;Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35 and 35(2); Customs Act - Sections 104; ;Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1); Offences against Person Act, 1861 - Sections 18, 20, 42 and 47; ;Aliens Control Act, 1991 - Sections 25(5); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(1), 167(2), 273, 327(1), 327(2) and 715.1

Reported in : AIR2004SC3566; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)504; 2004(2)BLJR1378; 98(2004)CLT491(SC); 2004CriLJ2881; 112(2004)DLT457(SC); 2004(77)DRJ390; RLW2004(3)SC402; 2004(6)SCALE15; (2004)5SCC518; 2004 INSC383

set out in prayer (A) aforesaid as offences under Section 375, 376 and 376A to 376D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;C) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem appropriate in the present facts … sexual abuse law and denies majority of women and children access to adequate redress in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution. Statistics and figures indicate that sexual abuse of children, particularly minor girl, children

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2003

Hira Lal and ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 34, 304(2), 304B, 306 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2003SC2865; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)184; 2003CriLJ3711; 105(2003)DLT705(SC); II(2003)DMC206SC; 2003(69)DRJ714; JT2003(7)SC596; RLW2003(4)SC541; 2003(5)SCALE445; (2003)8SCC80; 200

life. Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act 1986 brought about sweeping change sin the penal statutes, and Sections 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and Section 113B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short the 'Evidence Act') came … Act') came to be enforced.3. One Sarita (hereinafter referred to as 'deceased') committed suicide by consuming poison on 14.4.1999. She was married to accused Surrender on 26.11.1995. Other appellants Hiralal and Angoori Devi were her father-in-law and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2008

Pramod Kumar Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 436A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 20, 21, 32 and 142

Reported in : IV(2008)BC505(SC); 2008CriLJ4697; [2009(1)JCR79(SC)]; 2008(12)SCALE623; (2008)9SCC685; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(9)SCC685; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528; 2008AIRSCW6624; 2008(6)Supreme573; 2008(5)LH(SC)3528

different States for commission of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and also under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.5. According to the petitioner, there is … years i.e. since August, 1998. He has approached this Court for enforcement of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India.4. It is the case of the petitioner that he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

State Vs. Bansi Dhar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-31-2013

Subject : Criminal

Trial court convicted the three respondents and held them guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and all the three respondents were sentenced individually for the period already undergone … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the State under Section 377(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as, Cr.P.C.) for enhancing the sentence awarded … instance of the eye-witness, Sh. Suresh Sharma, his statement was recorded. On 14.7.1995, the injured, Sh. Raj Kumar, was found fit for making a statement,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1996

Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate (Fera) Ministry of Finance ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-19-1996

Subject : FERACriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164(2 and 3), 463; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 9(1), 35, 37, 40 and 56; Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193 and 228; Sea Customs Act - Sections 167(81) and 171-A; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25 and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD540; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)272; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)552; [1999]96CompCas745(AP)

aforesaid shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).' 10. It is clear from perusal of the above provision that any Gazetted Officer of … giving a caution or warning as contemplated under Section 164(2) Cr.PC in pursuance of the summons issued under Section 14 of the Central Excise and Salt Act are inadmissible in evidence; and relying on these decisions, the trial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial