Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 13 · Page 1 of about 9,742 results (0.138 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 28 2009

State of Punjab Vs. Nirmal Kaur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1535; JT2009(8)SC303; 2009(4)LC1878(SC)

On the accusation of commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Act investigation was undertaken, charges

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2022

Scania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-09-2022

Subject : Service Tax

its employees in their individual capacity it has committed the offences as defined under section 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code.” (Emphasis added) The afore-quoted paragraphs are all that become germane for a consideration of the issue in the … time of making initial promise being absent, 4 (2015) 8 SCC29315 no offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, 1860 can be said to have been made out.” (Emphasis supplied) In the case of SATISCHANDRA RATANLAL SHAH v. … 88-97, NARASAPURA, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, ACHHATANAHALLI, NARASAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR, KARNATAKA - 563 130, REPRESENTED BY PETR NOVOTNY.2. PETR NOVOTNY S/O IVAN NOVOTNY, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, MANAGING

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2008

Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi Vs. M.N. Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-21-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389, 389(1) and 482

Reported in : AIR2009SC1185; 2009CriLJ1116; RLW2009(2)SC1649; 2008(10)SCALE513; 2008(3)ShimLC257; 2008(8)SCC549; (2008)3SCC(Cri)572; 2008(4)LH(SC)2813

with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short `P.C. Act') and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year, 2 years and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 15 2005

Vasant Tukaram Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption of Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120, 120B and 409; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2531; [2005(3)JCR82(SC)]; JT2005(11)SC271; (2005)5SCC281

Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Act as well as Sections 120 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of four years and fine for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2006

The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu Vs. A. P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 19 and 28; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 212(2), 219(1), 220 and 360; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 1(3), 18 and 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71 and 161; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 562; Customs Act, 1962; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Defence of India Rules - Rule 126P(2); Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 43

Reported in : AIR2007SC51; 2006CriLJ4772; [2007(2)JCR54(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC590; 2007(1)MPHT1; 2007(1)OLR(SC)143; 2006(10)SCALE62; (2006)11SCC473

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 71 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Convicted by the trial Court - On appeal, the High Court upheld conviction under Section 7, but … trial Court was not justified in convicting the respondent in terms of Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short 'the Act').2. A brief reference to the factual aspects

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2004

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. C. Uma Maheswara Rao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 5, 7, 11, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 19(1), 20 and 20(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : AIR2004SC2042; 2004CriLJ2040; JT2004(4)SC167; 2004(4)SCALE106; (2004)4SCC399

to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- with default stipulation. They were also convicted under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'), sentenced to similar custodial punishment and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/-. But … Port Trust a charge sheet was filed under Section 120B IPC and Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(12) of the Act. The accused denied their guilt. The prosecution in support of its case examined 32 witnesses

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2003

State of H.P. Vs. M.P. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 193, 196, 197, 197(1) and 197(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 511; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2)(1), 6 and 6(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)283; 2004(1)BLJR429; JT2003(10)SC32; 2003(10)SCALE522; (2004)2SCC349

one was for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 120-B, Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'), Section 5(2) (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the 'Old … Section 5(2) (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the 'Old Act') corresponding to Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short the 'New Act'). The Special Judge (Forests), Shimla, directed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2012

Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad Vs K. Narayana Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1898 - Sections 482, 227, 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 109; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2)(, 13(1)(d)

the commission of offence punishable under Sections 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468 471 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’) and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2006

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Shri Ravi Shankar Srivastava, Ias ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 167, 168 and 177A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(1), 5(2) and 6; Constitution of India - Article 166; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 3, 4, 4(1) and 5

Reported in : AIR2006SC2872; 2006CriLJ4050; JT2006(7)SC313; 2006(7)SCALE618; (2006)7SCC188

the FIR registered by the appellant alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 120B, 167, 168, 177A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'IPC') and Sections 13(2) and 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short 'PC … Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench. Respondent No. 1, a member of Indian Administrative Service filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code') for quashing the FIR registered by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2004

T. Shankar Prasad Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 7, 11, 13(1), 13(2) and 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 161, 165 and 165A ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114

Reported in : 2004CriLJ884; 2004(164)ELT143(SC); JT2004(1)SC188; 2004(1)SCALE318; (2004)3SCC753

with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the 'Act') and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC'). 2. Appellants T. Shankar Prasad (in Crl. A. No. 909/1997) and Ghaiz Basha (in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial