Advanced Search Results

The Trustees of Safadar Hashmi Memorial Trust Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 95(1), 96, 124A, 153A, 153B, 219, 292, 293 and 295A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 95; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 99A and 99G

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3689; 2001(60)DRJ208

of enmity between different religions/communities which act is an offence punishable under Section 153-A and Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). In exercise of powers conferred under Section 9591) of the Code read with Notification … concerning which notification is purported to be made contains the matter the publication of which is punishable under Section 124A or 153A or 153B or Section 292 or Section 293 or Section 295-A. Further the government has to

Kedar Nath Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Common Law; Supreme Court Rules - Rule 1, Order 41; Defence of India Rules - Rules 11, 12 and 34(6); Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Constitution of Fire, 1937 - Article 40(6); Indian Penal Code Amendment Act, 1898; Independence Act, 1947; Defence of India Act, 1939; Government of India Act, 1935; Indian Press Act, 1910 - Sections 4; Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 9(1-A); East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 - Sections 7(1); Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 295A and 505; Prize Competitions Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : AIR1962SC955; 1962(0)BLJR636; (1963)IMLJ40(SC); [1962]Supp2SCR769

questioned whether it infringe the freedom of speech - The Court ruled that the Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, that makes sedition an offence, was constitutionally invalid - Further, though the section imposes restrictions on the fundamental

State (Nct of Delhi) Vs. Ahmed Jaan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 121, 121A, 122 and 124A

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4355; JT2008(10)SC179; (2008)152PLR735; 2008(11)SCALE2455; 2008AIRSCW5692

Rs. 17-1/4 lacs through Ghayasuddin and Mohd. Ahad of Srinagar.The respondent was charge sheeted under Sections 121/121A/122/124A/120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') on the above allegations of being a member of TUM and for conspiring in waging … actually got transferred Rs. 17-1/4 lacs through Ghayasuddin and Mohd. Ahad of Srinagar.The respondent was charge sheeted under Sections 121/121A/122/124A/120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short `IPC') on the above allegations of being a member of

Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Punjab Special Powers (Press) Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 93, 95 and 96; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 153A, 153B, 292 and 293; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 99A; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226

Reported in : 1992CriLJ1002

Section 293 or Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), the State Government, may, by notification, stating the grounds of its opinion, … in paragraph 4 of Annexure P-2 in order to contend that no offence under the various sections of the Indian Penal Code mentioned in Section 95 of the Code is made out and, as such, the instructions being beyond the … document,wherever printed, appears to the State Government to contain any matter the publication of which is punishable under Section 124A or Section 153A or Section 153B or Section 292 or Section 293 or Section 295A of the Indian

Shashidhar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

registered an First Information Report in Crime no.160/2016, for offences punishable under Sections 166, 109, 120B, 124-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevity), Section 5 of the Essential Services Management Act, 1981, Section … No.160/2016 of Yelahanka New Town Police Station, Bangalore City for the offence punishable under Sections 166, 109, 120B, 124A of IPC and Section 5 of the Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1981; Section 4 of Police (Incitement of

Barjinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through the Chief Secretary for th ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 95, 95(1), 96, 96(3) and 96(4); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A and 153B

Reported in : (1993)104PLR1

Section 293 or Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), the State Government may, by notification, Stating the grounds of its opinion, … The power was confined only to matters the publication of which was punishable under the specified sections of the Indian Penal Code. The State Government was required to state the grounds of the opinion. A right of post-decisional hearing was … document.wherever printed, appears to the State Government to contain any matter the publication of which is punishable under Section 124A or Section 153A or Section 153B or Section 292 or Section 293 or Section 295A of the Indian

Balwant Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A and 153A; Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984 - Sections 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : AIR1995SC1785; 1995(2)Crimes300(SC); 1995(2)SCALE148; (1995)3SCC214; [1995]2SCR411; 1995(1)LC834(SC)

on bail. Their bail bonds shall stand discharged. Criminal - reasonable doubt - Sections 124A and 153A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 14 of Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984 - appeal under Section 14 challenging conviction

Nazir Khan and ors. Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 121A, 122, 124A and 364A; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 3(5), 4, 15 and 15(2); ; Foreigners Act, 1946 - Sections 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 24 to 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - 162 and 164

Reported in : AIR2003SC4427; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)651; 2003CriLJ5021; 106(2003)DLT70(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC200; 2003(6)SCALE652; (2003)8SCC461

of the present appellants for offences punishable under Sections 364A, 121A, 122, 124A read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short the 'IPC') and Sections 3 and 4 of the Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

Syed Ahmed Bhukhari Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)287; 1997(4)Crimes204; 69(1997)DLT525; 1998RLR119

These remarks are accordingly expunged and this petition is disposed of. Criminal - remarks - Section 124A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - appeal filed against Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) alleging that he passed

Barjinder Singh, Chief Editor, the Daily Ajit Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Press Councils Act, 1978 - Sections 8 and 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 95 and 99A; Press Law Repeal and Amendment Act, 1922; General Clauses Act; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; audi alteram partem rule; President's rule; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 95, 95(1), 96, 96(3), 96(4), 99A and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53A, 124A, 153A, 153B, 292, 293 and 295A

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2040

Government established by law in India, and hence, the publication thereof constitutes of offence under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It will be seen that instead of stating the grounds of its opinion, the State Government reproduced certain