Advanced Search Results

Mohammed Arshad Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 498A; Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : AIR2007SC624; 2006(12)SCALE370; 2007AIRSCW217; (2007)1SCC(Cri)726; (2007)1Crimes165(SC)

Matched in: Citation AIR2007SC624; 2006(12)SCALE370; 2007AIRSCW217; (2007)1SCC(Cri)726; (2007)1Crimes165(SC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. L.D. Kanchan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1 and 2); Banking Regulation Act - Sections 46A and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 - Sections 14 and 51; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Amendment Act, 1980; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21(12) and 161

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR59; [1991]72CompCas632(Bom)

a nationalised bank is not a 'public servant' within the meaning of clause (12)(b) of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are quashed and set aside. Rule in each of the criminal revision application is, accordingly, made absolute. Company

Attiq-ur-rehman Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 313, 332, 333, 334, 343, 344, 345, 347, 461, 466, 467, 469, 470 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR1996SC1267; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)831; 1996CriLJ1997; JT1996(2)SC670; 1996(4)KarLJ740; 1996(2)SCALE557; (1996)3SCC37; [1996]3SCR19

Act, 1957, Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14 and 16 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 - whether in absence of appointment of Municipal Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate can take cognizance and try accused for … Criminal Procedure, 1898, all municipal magistrates appointed under this Act shall be deemed to be magistrates appointed under Section 12 of the said Code.(7) Nothing in this shall be deemed to preclude any magistrate appointed hereunder from trying

State of MaharashtrA. Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123, 124, 34; ndian Explosives Act; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 151, 152, 153, 154; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4); Passports Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 11, 5 to 16, 26, 30, 30(b), 31

were charged with offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123 and 124 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused-respondents were also charged with offences under the … the controversy. Initially the accused-respondents were charged with offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123 and 124 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Mahendra Mishra and Others Vs. State of Karnataka By The Assistant Com ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

, for brevity) and for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 114 and 419 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Hereinafter referred to as the IPC , for brevity). 2. The petitioners herein had filed an application seeking … and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bangalore Urban District in case No.Spl.CC 249/2015, for an offence punishable under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Hereinafter referred to as the PC Act , for brevity) and

Virender Yadav @ Vicky @ Chhotu Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 397, 307, 186, 353, 120B, 34, 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313; Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 - Section 7A(2)

said FIRs. On arrest of accused Gian Chand, supplementary charge-sheets were also filed in both the said cases. 12. In case FIR No.17/2005, a charge under Section 392/397/34 and Section 411/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 was framed … the judgment dated 31.07.2009, by which the appellant was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 397 Indian Penal Code, 1860 in case FIR No.17/2005 registered at police station Ashok Vihar and has further challenged the sentence order of

Kunhimuhammed@Kunheethu versus the State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.392

18.09.2018 whereby the appeal of the appellant-accused no.1, against his conviction under sections 302, 324 and 326/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 1 has been dismissed. The prosecution story in brief is: 2.1. On 10.04.2006, the sympathizers of United Democratic … [2024] 12 S.C.R. 392 : 2024 INSC 937 Kunhimuhammed@Kunheethu v. The State of Kerala … for Consideration Whether appellant had the intention to commit murder; whether the appellant’s act can be brought under section 304, IPC in light of the offence being committed in exercise of private defense and thereby exceeding the

Ram Nandan Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 53 to 76, 77, 153 to 165 and 352; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 17 and 124A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(23)

Reported in : AIR1959All101; 1959CriLJ1

- constitutional validity - Article 19 (1) (a) and (2) of Constitution of India and Section 124-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 124-A imposes far to wide restrictions on freedom of speech - not justifiable in the interest … 1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the Sessions Judge, Basti, convicting the appellant under Section 124-A, I. P. C., and sentencing him to imprisonment for three years. On 29-5-1954, he delivered a speech to

Salman Qureshi vs State (Gnct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

190/2015, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishabe under Sections 392/397/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’), wherein the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC … dated 20.03.2026 by this Court. It is also argued that the applicant has been in judicial custody since 12.02.2026, and the trial will take considerable time to conclude. It is therefore prayed that the applicant be released

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Chandrashekar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

following cases: i) DHANNA, ETC. vs. STATE OF M.P. (AIR1996SC2478 wherein the Apex Court has held thus: “(C) Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.300 - Murder - Proof - Prosecution witness did not refer to any role played … by the learned counsel for the appellants.20. Lastly, the learned counsel has taken us through the principles of the Indian Evidence Act by referring to Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. There is no evidence on record … by hanging from the ceiling fan in the house of her husband. 126. In pursuance of filing a complaint by the complainant, criminal law was