Advanced Search Results
Dr. Y. Bhaskar Rao Vs. State of Karnataka, Through Special Investigati ...
Karnataka
Nov-22-2016
Land Acquisition
2(s) Section 482 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section 17 Section 19 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 34 Section 109 Section 119 Section 120(B) Section 201 Section 202 Section 217 Section 385 Section 419 Jurisdiction
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Venkataraman Vs. Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Rep. b ...
Chennai
Mar-25-2004
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 119, 120B, 420 and 469; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13 and 13(12)
2004(3)CTC486
Service - terminal benefits - Article 226 of Constitution of India, Sections 119, 120B, 420 and 469 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 13 and 13 (12) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - petitioner is facing criminal trial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDilawarsab Alisab Jakati Vs. State of Karnataka by Its State Public Pr ...
Karnataka
Feb-18-2005
CriminalCivil
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 326, 375, 376, 376(2) and 511; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 5; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 32 and 119; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2005CriLJ2687; ILR2005KAR2282
sentence of fine imposed does not call for interference. The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated. (A) INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 - SECTION 376(2) (F) OFFENCE UNDER-Accused committing Rape on his cousin-sister aged 10 years who is dumb with … duty cast on this court to examine whether the evidence of P.W. 13 is recorded as provided under Section 119 of the Evidence Act If so, such evidence recorded by the learned Sessions Judge can be acted upon.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R. Sai Bharathi Vs. J. Jayalalitha and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-24-2003
Criminal
Companies Act, 1956; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 47A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 43, 109, 119, 120B, 169, 175, 176, 177, 179, 181, 191, 202, 221, 222, 223, 225, 405, 409 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments Rules - Rules 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7; Tamil Nadu Stamp Act; Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 73; Constitution of India - Articles 73, 136, 154, 162 and 309; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 189; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 481
2004CriLJ286; 2003(4)CTC577; JT2003(9)SC343; 2003(10)SCALE68b; (2004)2SCC9
sentences imposed upon the accused will run concurrently. A-1 was acquitted of the charge framed under Section 420 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also the charge under Section 169 IPC. A-2 was acquitted of the charges framed under Section 169 … A-3 was charged under Section 120-B IPC, Section 13(2) road with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 119 IPC read with Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and under Sections 169
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers
Supreme Court of India
Dec-17-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(40), 119, 139(1), 139(4), 139(8), 140A, 142(1), 143(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 156, 208, 210, 215(4), 216, 220(2A), 234A to 234C, 243B(3), 245C, 245C(1C), 245C(1D), 245D, 245D(2A) to (2D), 245D(4), 245D(6), 245D(6A), 245F(1), 245F(2), 245H, 245H(1), 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Finance Act, 1995; Finance Act, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975
AIR2003SC3942; (2003)179CTR(SC)362; (2003)2MLJ65(SC); (2003)3SCC57; [2002]SUPP5SCR387
prosecution and penalty. The immunity extends not only to penal provisions of the Act but to offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC'), or under any other Central Act for the time being in force. Benefit of … to the extent of granting relief under the Circulars dated 23rd May, 1996 issued by the Board under Section 119 of the Act. While exercising the power derived under the Circulars of the Board, the Commission does not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJay Kishan and Ors. versus the State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-12-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]3S.C.R.65
by Appellant No.15 were involved in the following three criminal cases: (1) CC No.119/2022 under Sections 395/427/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;6 (2) CC No.58/2023 under Sections 420/406/120B/504/506 of the IPC, and; (3) CC No.60/2023 under Sections 120B/420/406/506 of … High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. FIR against the appellants,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash B Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jun-14-2021
Criminal
No.113/2020 of Mayakonda Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 306, 201 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 beside Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(v-a) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the … for R-1; Notice to R-2 held sufficient vide court order dated 04.06.2021) This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14A(2) of Schedule Case and Schedule Tribes Act of 1989, praying to, set aside the order dated 21.01.2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagraj Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jun-14-2021
Criminal
No.113/2020 of Mayakonda Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 306, 201 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 beside Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(v-a) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the … for R-1; Notice to R-2 held sufficient vide court order dated 04.06.2021) This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14A(2) of Schedule Case and Schedule Tribes Act of 1989, praying to, set aside the order dated 21.01.2021
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: State of Kerala, Vs. Executive Officer, Nediyiruppu Panchayat
Kerala
Apr-05-1968
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 254(2); Kerala Panchayats (Trial of Offences by Magistrates) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 5(2), 28, 29(2), 36, 37, 190, 190(1), 191 and 192; Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - Sections 119 and 129(2)
1969CriLJ486
to repeal the above argument Section 5 reads as follows:--'Trial of offences under Penal Code.--(1) All offences under the Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860) shall be investigated, inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to the provisions … a Magistrate under Section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code to take cognizance of offences is protected by Section 119 of the Act; and so Rule 3 of the Rules, which conferred jurisdiction exclusively in the Second Class
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for Restricting Us ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-18-2005
ConstitutionEnvironment
Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(1)A, 19(10), 21, 25, 141 and 142; Noise Pollution Control and Regulation Rules, 1999; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Noise Abetment Act, 1960 - Sections 2; Control on Pollution Act, 1974; Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act, 1993; Noise Control Act, 1975; Noise Control (Miscellaneous Articles) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control (Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Accessories) Regulations, 1995; Noise Control Ordinance; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 - Rule 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 95, 268, 290 and 291; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 89 and 90; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988;
AIR2005SC3136; 2005(3)AWC2685(SC); 2005(5)BomCR553; 121(2005)DLT547(SC); [2005(4)JCR4(SC)]; JT2005(6)SC210; (2005)5SCC733
In Kirori Mal Bishambar Dayal v. The State , accused/petitioner was convicted and sentenced under Section 290 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was fined Rs. 50 for causing noise and emitting smoke and vibrations by operating of heavy machinery … noise exposure for work zone area has been prescribed. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Rules framed thereunder107. Rules 119 and 120 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, deal with reduction of noise. Rule 119. Horns(1) On
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »