Advanced Search Results

Shail Mehboob Ali Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and Secund ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Societies Registration Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 489A, 489B, 489C and 489D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 106, 107, 108 and 110(1)

Reported in : 1992(2)ALT158; 1991CriLJ1

allowed. Criminal - validity of charge - Societies Registration Act and Sections 489A, 489B, 489C and 489D of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 106, 107, 108 and 110 (1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - name of petitioner included … been placed on a decision of the Supreme Court in Gopalanachari v. State of Kerala, : 1981CriLJ337 : Section 110, Cr.P.C. reads : 'When an Executive Magistrate receives information that there is within his local jurisdiction a person

Kali Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 27, 32(1), 114 and 145; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 110, 112, 162 and 342; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 380, 392, 397, 454 and 457

Reported in : AIR1973SC2773; 1974CriLJ1; (1973)2SCC808; [1974]1SCR722

court and the High Court and acquit the accused. Criminal - benefit of doubt - Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal challenging conviction for offence under Section 302 - onus upon prosecution to prove different ingredients of … released from Central Jail Nahan. On August 1, 1968 the police presented a challan against the accused under Section 110 of the CrPC in the court of District Magistrate Nahan. Notice under Section 112 of the CrPC was

Jaleshwar Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 109, 110, 149, 302, 307 and 324

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3995; JT2009(7)SC572; 2009(7)SCALE219; 2009AIRSCW4258

faced trial before learned Sessions Judge. Present appellant was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). Accused No. 3-Bir Bahadur Singh was convicted under Section 302 IPC. Both A-1 and … entered later in the records.4. That being so, the appropriate conviction would be under Section 307 read with Section 110 IPC. Custodial sentence of 7 years would meet the ends of justice. The appeal is allowed to the

Dr. Ambati Balaji Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 109, 110 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)485; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)555; I(2001)DMC97

of the offence of kidnapping, abduction, extortion, cheating or mischief, or any offence punishable under Chapter XII of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or under Section 498-A, or Section 489-D of that Code; or(e) habitually commits, or attempt … under Section 109 of Cr.P.C. However it may be presumed that the notice might have been issued under Section 110 of Cr.P.C., which reads as follows :'110. Security for good behaviour from habitual offenders -When an Executive Magistrate

Som Lal Vs. Vijay Laxmi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Acts : Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 208 to 228; Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 - Sections 3 to 21, 76 to 89, 100, 143 and 240; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961; Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Punjab Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 243B, 243C, 243D, 243F, 243K, 243P, 243Q, 243Q, 243V and 243ZA; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 110; Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961; Civil Rights Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 153A, 171E, 171F, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D, 498A and 505; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911

Reported in : (2006)143PLR81a

Section 376A or Section 376B or Section 376C or Section 376D or Section 498A or Section 505 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 or any offence punishable under Chapter XIII of this Act unless a period of six years has elapsed … has been convicted of an election offence; or(e) has been ordered to give security for good behaviour under Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; or(f) has been notified as disqualified for appointment as public servant

Thakur Raghubir Singh Vs. Court of Wards, Ajmer and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(5), 31(2) and 31-A; Ajmer Government Wards Regulation, 1888 - Sections 6, 7 and 27; Ajmer Tenancy and Land Records Act, 1950 - Sections 112

Reported in : AIR1953SC373; [1953]4SCR1049

lag or neg, he shall be deemed to have committed an offence of extortion within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860)'. 7. Just as section 110 declares an illegal exaction by a landlord to be

Dinesh Vitthal Patil and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 110(e)(g), 111; Mumbai Police Act - Sections 37(1)(3), 135; Maharashtra Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 1995 - Section 3

148, Acquitted RCC/404/08 1860 149, 452, 353, Dt.30/10/09 332, 427, 504, 506 Mumbai Police Act. 37(1)(3)/135 4. 19/2008 Indian Penal Code 1860 143, 147, 341, Acquitted RCC/427/08 504, 506 Dt.17/7/09 Mumbai Police Act 37(1)(3)/135 5. 12/2010 Indian Penal Code 153(1)(B) … the proceedings in which the petitioners were acquitted, was taken. 4. The grounds for issuance of notices under Section 110(e)(g) read with Section 111 of Criminal Procedure Code can be narrated as under :- Somewhere on 6th September,

Banshilal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 110, 300, 302, 304, 323 and 324

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT66(CG)

34, 110, 300, 302, 304, 323 and 324 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) - Deceased and two appellants were real brothers - Appellants were accused … Hiralal, he could nevertheless be guilty for abatement of the offence punishable under Section 324 in view of Section 110 of the Indian Penal Code which reads as under :--'110. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act … Additional Sessions Judge after holding the accused/appellant Banshilal guilty of the offences under Sections 302 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Murlimanohar for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code sentenced each

Alpesh Navinchandra Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 8 and 28AA; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 102, 111, 127B to 127J and 142; Income Tax Act, 1961; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 32A and 32D; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 420; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 123; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 110; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32

Reported in : JT2007(3)SC630; 2007(3)SCALE598; (2007)2SCC777

offence under this Act or under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any other Central Act for the time being in force … of duty and has also made provisions for granting immunity from prosecution under the Customs Act, 1962 under the Indian Penal Code and also under the other Central Law, it is clear that the intention of the Legislature was more … dutiable goods, books of account, other documents or any sale proceeds of the goods have been seized under Section 110, the applicant shall not be entitled to make an application under Sub-section (1) before the expiry of one

Rajesh Sharma and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 110 and 124; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 174 and 175

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN604,2004(175)ELT82(Cal)

was intimated in the said summonses that non-compliance with the summonses is an offence under Sections 174/175 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner after receiving the summons dated 29.7.1999 sought for time and thereafter, by a letter dated 12th … any reason and the said goods are lying seized though no formal notice of such purported seizure under Section 110 of the Customs Act, hereunder referred to as the Act, was ever issued. The said order dated 4th