Advanced Search Results
Pankaj Kumar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-11-2008
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 197, 258, 309, 311, 437(2), 468 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 101, 120B, 302, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 477A; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227
AIR2008SC3077; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)491; 2008CriLJ3944; JT2008(8)SC109; 2008(II)OLR(SC)482; RLW2008(3)SC2368; 2008(9)SCALE760; 2008AIRSCW5165
twelve persons for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 477A, 101 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `IPC') and Sections 5(1)(c)(d) along with Section 5(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. In
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaveen Chandra Vs. State of Uttranchal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-27-2006
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96, 100, 101, 102, 105, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366
AIR2007SC363; 2007CriLJ874; [2007(2)JCR247(SC)]; RLW2007(3)SC2143; 2006(12)SCALE456; 2006(3)ShimLC405; (2007)1Crimes207(SC); 2006AIRSCW6230;
by two others i.e. parents of the appellant. Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (in short the 'IPC') read with Section 34 of the IPC. While the appellant was awarded death sentence, … Khan : 1977CriLJ1897 , and Mohinder Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab : 1979CriLJ584 . Sections 100 to 101 define the extent of the right of private defence of body. If a person has a right of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeelkanth Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Sep-09-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 101, 302 and 304
2004(2)MPHT33(CG)
- Sections 101, 302 and 304 Part 1 of Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) - Appellant convicted for offence under Section 302 of IPC - Hence, … the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge after holding him guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code convicted and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- in … in which the accused has exceeded this limit of the right of private defence available to him under Section 101, Penal Code.'16. Now, in the light of the above-referred principles laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court, we will
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arun Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Mar-16-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 101, 102, 105, 302, 324, 342 and 454
2009(57)BLJR1201; 2009CriLJ2065; JT2009(4)SC78; 2009(3)SCALE803; 2009(3)LC1100(SC); 2009AIRSCW2318; 2009(3)LHSC1684; 2009(4)KCCR2528
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench upholding the conviction of the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 500/- with default … Khan : 1977CriLJ1897 , and Mohinder Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab : 1979CriLJ584 . Sections 100 to 101 define the extent of the right of private defence of body. If a person has a right of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarjerao Sahadeo Gaikwad and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Feb-05-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 100, 302, 304, 307, 323, 326 and 504; Evidence Act - Sections 101, 102 and 105
1997BomCR(Cri)517; 1997CriLJ3839
21. Order accordingly. Criminal - conviction - Sections 34, 100, 302, 304, 307, 323, 326 and 504 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 101, 102 and 105 of Indian Evidence Act - appeal against conviction under Sections 304, 307 … beyond reasonable doubt and only when it has discharged that obligation, or primary burden; within the terms of section 101 of The Indian Evidence Act, is the burden shifted on the accused within the terms of section 105
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrilok Chand JaIn Vs. State of Delhi
Supreme Court of India
Aug-19-1975
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 242; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 151, 161 and 165; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4(1), 5(1), 5(2) and 161; Evidence Act - Sections 101
AIR1977SC666; (1976)78PLR323; (1975)4SCC761
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 342 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 151, 161 and 165 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 101 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - appellant was charged for offence of taking bribe either
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeriasami and anr. Vs. State of T.N.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-25-1996
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 101 and 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162 and 313
1996VIIAD(SC)105; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)78; 1996(2)ALT(Cri)862; 1997CriLJ219; 1996(4)Crimes39(SC); JT1996(8)SC449; 1996(7)SCALE202; (1996)6SCC457; [1996]Supp6SCR757
for seven years on each of them. Criminal - burden of proof - Sections 302 and 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 101 and 105 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - appellants alleged to cause death - appellant … absence of such circumstances'. The said rule does not whittle down the axiomatic rule of burden (indicated in Section 101) that the prosecution must prove that the accused has committed the offence charged against. The traditional rule that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Kaliaperumal
Chennai
Jun-17-1954
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103 and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 236
AIR1954Mad1088; (1954)IIMLJ673
years. Criminal - homicidal violence - Section 236 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 201 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 101 to 103 and 114 of Evidence Act, 1872 - appellant murdered deceased to rob him
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShripati Kashinath Ambede and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-02-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 102
1997(1)BomCR621
to them on payment of necessary charges on an expedited basis. Criminal - murder - Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 101 and q102 of Evidence Act, 1872 - appellants allegedly committed offence of murder - witnessess
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Meenapati Daveed and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-22-1957
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 235(1), 239, 403 and 403(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 411; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101-104; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(2)
AIR1959AP137; 1959CriLJ298
quashed. Criminal - theft - Sections 235, 239 and 403 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Section 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 101 to 104 of Evidence Act, 1972 and Article 20 (2) of Constitution of India - accused
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »