Advanced Search Results

Arjun Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 100, 107, 109, 120A, 120B, 363, 365, 366, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D and 511

Reported in : AIR2009SC1568; 2009CriLJ1332; JT2009(2)SC413; 2009(2)SCALE302; (2009)4SCC18; 2009(2)ShimLC83; 2009(2)LC651(SC); 2009AIRSCW1096; 2009(3)KCCRSN161

the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 376, 511, 363 and 366 as well as Section 100 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years, 3 years, 4 years,

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81, 83

Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 272, 273, 201, 109, 114, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 65(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), 66(1)(b), 67-1A, 72, 75, 81 and 83 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, … Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 1281 of 2012 whereby the High Court dismissed his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No. … of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short ‘the Code’) seeking regular bail in C.R. No. 252 of 2009 registered with Odhav Police Station, Ahmedabad for the

Shahejadkhan Mahebubkhan Pathan. Vs. State of Gujarat.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) - Sections 8(c), 21, 29; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 120-B

under Sections 18, 22, 23, 25, 28, 29 and 30 of the NDPS Act and Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘the IPC’). This Court, having regard to the facts and circumstances and taking note of the … maximum imprisonment of ten years under Section 304 Part I but he also imposed a fine of Rs 100 or to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.34. In a suo motu revision, the High Court observed that

M.Rama Krishna Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - Sections 374(2), 313; Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) - Section 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 6

Rajahmundry whereunder and whereby the sole accused was found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short "IPC") and accordingly he was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay

Naveen Chandra Vs. State of Uttranchal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 96, 100, 101, 102, 105, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366

Reported in : AIR2007SC363; 2007CriLJ874; [2007(2)JCR247(SC)]; RLW2007(3)SC2143; 2006(12)SCALE456; 2006(3)ShimLC405; (2007)1Crimes207(SC); 2006AIRSCW6230;

by two others i.e. parents of the appellant. Appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (in short the 'IPC') read with Section 34 of the IPC. While the appellant was awarded death sentence, … If a person has a right of private defence of body under Section 97, that right extends under Section 100 to causing death if there is reasonable apprehension that death or grievous hurt would be the consequence of

Dharam and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 97, 99, 100, 102, 105, 148, 149, 300(4), 302, 304, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2007SC397; 2007CriLJ791; JT2007(1)SC299; 2006(13)SCALE280; 2006AIRSCW6298; (2007)1Crimes363(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)1028; 2007(1)KCCR701(SC);

case No. 135 of 1994 (Sonipat) for having committed offences under Sections 148, 302, 323 and 324/149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'). The Trial Court found them guilty; convicted them for offences punishable under all the aforementioned … mischief and criminal trespass. Section 99 IPC lays down exceptions to which rule of self defence is subject. Section 100 IPC provides, inter alia, that the right of private defence of the body extends, under the restrictions mentioned

Kunhimuhammed@Kunheethu versus the State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.392

18.09.2018 whereby the appeal of the appellant-accused no.1, against his conviction under sections 302, 324 and 326/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 1 has been dismissed. The prosecution story in brief is: 2.1. On 10.04.2006, the sympathizers of United Democratic … for Consideration Whether appellant had the intention to commit murder; whether the appellant’s act can be brought under section 304, IPC in light of the offence being committed in exercise of private defense and thereby exceeding the

V. Subramani and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96, 97, 96, 98, 99, 100 to 106, 109, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 324; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105

Reported in : AIR2005SC1983; 2005CriLJ1727; 2005(1)JKJ25[SC]; JT2005(3)SC82; (2005)10SCC358; 2005(2)LC1004(SC)

Madras High Court affirming their conviction and sentence for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). Seven persons faced trial for allegedly having committed homicidal death of one Vadivel (hereinafter … If a person has a right of private defence of body under Section 97, that right extends under Section 100 to causing death if there is reasonable apprehension that death or grievous hurt would be the consequence of

Shyam Babu Vs. State of Uttar.Pradesh. (U.P.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 379

at P.S. Bharthana, Etawah against the above-mentioned 7 persons under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC).(f) On 06.03.1979, after filing of charge sheet, the case was committed to the Court … Complainant - Nathu Ram, son of Pahunchi Lal, at P.S. Bharthana, Etawah against the above-mentioned 7 persons under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC).(f) On 06.03.1979, … Bench of two Judges of this Court in Ranjan Dwivedi etc. vs. C.B.I., Through the Director General (Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 200 of 2001) rejected

Bharatha Matha and anr. Vs. R. Vijaya Renganathan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Section 16 - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ; Section 112 - Evidence Act, 1872;Section 5(1) - Hindu Marriage Act; Section 16 - Hindu Marriage Act;Section 114 - Evidence Act;Section16(3) - Hindu Marriage Act

Reported in : AIR2010SC2685

offence under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, is not bad in law. [Para 8 & 15] B. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302: Murder - Single blow- Appellant used a kitchen knife - A kitchen knife with sharp edges is … judgment and decree dated 17th September, 1986. The said purchaser, respondent No.1, alone filed the Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter called as `CPC') before the High Court which has been allowed.