Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the essential commodities act 1955 section 278 · Page 1 of about 30 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 2012

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-07-2012

Subject : Education

in Section 141 of The Negotiable Instruments Act. 45. To illustrate, we may refer to Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 25 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, Section 22-C of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, … of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Section 278-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 14-A of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2008

The Islampur Municipality and anr. Vs. Chaudhuri M. Manjar Afaque and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-19-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act - Section 6(1); ;Bihar Land Reforms Act; ;West Bengal Transfer of Territories Act, 1956; ;West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(6), 17, 17(1), 28 and 37; ;West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation Rules; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894; ;West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 - Sections 278 and 281; ;West Bengal Markets Regulation Act, 1968; ;West Bengal Markets Regulation Act, 1970; ;Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; ;Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act; ;Punjab Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation Act; ;Bihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation Act; ;Essential Commodities Act, 1955; ;Mines and Minerals (Regulat

The words and phrases 'regulation' and 'prohibition' was considered by the Apex Court while answering the issue under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and more particularly the Section 3(2)(d) of the said Act to identify whether the word 'regulating' includes prohibition … grant licence irrespective of the fact that under the West Bengal Municipal Act, there is a provision under Section 278 regarding grant of licence to run the market by the private body. By the order of remand, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2000

Gurupad Lachamanna Chintalwar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Maharashtra Sugar Factories (Reservation by Areas and Regulation of Crushing and Sugar Supply) Order, 1984; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR84; (2001)3BOMLR553; 2001(1)MhLj41

said Order or of the terms and conditions of a license/permit shall be punishable under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. It is thus clear that the sugar cane growers are not only estopped from exporting the sugar cane … decided by this Court in the case of Girdharilal Bhaulal Pardeshi v. State of Maharashtra and others,. About 278 cane growers had approached this Court contending that they had cultivated sugar cane within the reserved area of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 03 1995

Jagdish Prasad Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-1995

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16, 16A and 16(1); Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act, 1976; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7, 12A, 12AA and 12A(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 259, 262 to 265, 275, 278, 279 and 465; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 537; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 448

Reported in : 1997CriLJ27

as no Prejudice was caused.9. Our attention is also invited to a few decisions arising on prosecution under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Section 12A was incorporated by Act No. 47 of 1967. By Act No. 18 of 1981, Section 12A was … evidence taken. Evidence of the prosecution and the defence has to be recorded in terms of Sections 275, 278 and 279 of the Code. Trial of cases by summons procedure is provided in Chapter XX of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2002

Samudrala Venkateswar Rao, Managing Partner, Maruthi Traders Vs. Govt. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-03-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 6A, 6B, 7, 8 and 10C; Andhra Pradesh Schedule Commodities Dealers (Licensing and Distribution) Order, 1982 - Rule 4(4); Andhra Pradesh Food Grain Dealers Licensing Order, 1964; Pulses, Edible Oil Seeds and Edible Oils Storage Control Order, 1977; Madhya Pradesh Food grains Dealers Licensing Order, 1958; Maharashtra Control Order, 1971; Orissa Rice and Paddy Control Order, 1965

Reported in : 2003(3)ALT677

(iv) of the license conditions of the Control Order, 1982 as well as Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to 'the EC Act'). Therefore, the inspecting authorities seized the entire stock, worth Rs. 30,26,960/- and … Conditions 3 (i) (iii) and (iv) of the license conditions of the Control Order, 1982 as well as Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to 'the EC Act'). Therefore, the inspecting … 916.85 2225 1308.15 G.N Pod 164.971 G.N. Seed2. Oils 20.67 250 8 278.67 56.47 - (S.F. and G.N.)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The inspecting authority further noted the contraventions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2003

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

from it by the appellant.62. 'Seed' is also an essential commodity within the meaning of the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 which has been enacted by the Parliament in exercise of its power conferred under Entry 33 of List … case of London and North Eastern Railway Company and Berrriman, 1946 AC 278 Lord Simonds quoted with approval the following observations of Lord Esher N.K. … to regulate sale and purchase of agricultural produce and for establishment, superintendence and control of market in U.P. Section 6 provides for declaration of market area and Sections 9 and 10 prohibit business of specified agricultural produce

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2005

Jaiswal GraIn Agency and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-05-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A, 6A (1) and 6C; Uttar Pradesh Food Grains Dealers (Licensing and Restriction on Hoarding) Order, 1976

Reported in : AIR2005All359; 2005(3)AWC2989

the respondents towards the sale of goods after confiscation of the same under provisions of Section 6A of The Essential Commodities Act, 1955, (hereinafter called 'the Act 1955').2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the petitioner … by Hon'ble Apex Court in Consolidated Coffee Ltd. v. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Madikeri and Ors., (2001) 1 SCC 278 and Central Bank of India v. Ravindra and Ors. AIR 2002 SC 3095.9. In Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1975

M.V. Kuppuswami Vs. the Taluk Supply Officer, Sriperumbudur and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-1975

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Paddy and Rice Dealers (Licencing, Regulation and Disposal of Stocks) Order, 1968 - Sections 3(1) and 14; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 102 and 103; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1975Mad395

rightly seized for the violation of Clause 3 (1) of the Licensing Order read with Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The first respondent has also taken an objection to the maintainability of a writ filed by the owner … procedure is not obligatory.6. It has been held in Mangudi v. Sub-Inspector, C. I. D. Ramnad 1970 MLW 278 = AIR 1971 Mad 275. that the intendment of Clause 14 of the Madras Paddv and Rice Dealers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2004

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Cabot International Capital ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-03-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board in India Act, 1992 - Sections 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15HA, 15HB, 15I and 15J; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 3, 3(1) and 3(4)

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR700; [2005]123CompCas841(Bom); (2004)2CompLJ363(Bom); [2004]51SCL307(Bom)

to the Agricultural Income-tax.19. Mr. Dwarkadas relied on Nathulal's case (supra). This was a case of offence under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 r/w Section 40 of the Indian Penal Code. This was again a case of criminal offence. The principle … excessive and unreasonable, as found by the Appellate Tribunal.(XI) Consolidated Coffee Ltd. v. Agrl. ITO [2001] 1 SCC 278 : This judgment elaborates the meaning of the words 'interest' and 'penalty' in reference to the Agricultural Income-tax.19.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2000

Procter and Gamble Home Products Ltd. Vs. C.C. and C. Ex.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-10-2000

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(4), 11A, 11A(1) and 20; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Act; Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975 - Rules 7 and 10; Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(128)ELT330(MP)

Apex Court affirming the order of the High Court quashing the show cause notice under the provision of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 has held that inference drawn by the appellants/Union of India was baseless and arbitrary. The learned Counsel has … case of Jayant Vitamins Limited v. Union of India, 1991 (53) E.L.T. 278 (M.P.) a Division Bench of this Court held that instances of mis-statement … was also pointed out that PGHP is not a related person to the petitioner within the meaning of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It was also pointed out that PGIL and PGHP do not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial