Advanced Search Results

Dr. Makrand Balkrishna Patwardhan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

of Bihar and others, the compounding is permissible. According to him, in the matter of compounding, provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, there is a specific provision as regards compounding, in view of the Section 152 of the said Act. … was placed before the Court in the above referred complaint case and in view of the provision of Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the matter was referred for mediation. 5. Pursuant to the order of

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17(5), 27 and 29; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 45, 49 and 59

Reported in : AIR2004Bom294; 2004(3)BomCR485

State is now bound to make good the loss by subsidy under Section 65 of the Electricity Supply Act, 2003. The Commission has recorded a finding of fact that both the appellant Board and consumers are responsible for … the appellant Board in this regard is consistent with the Electricity (Supply) Annual Accounts Rules 1985 framed under Section 89 of the Electricity Supply Act. In other states such as Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and also in

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

determine policy and issue directions etc.); other enactments such as Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India, 2008; The Electricity Act, 2003 (Section 79 and various sub-sections enabling determination of policy, the Tariff, Regulations of Tariffs, facilitation of inter-State transmission of … 85-C - presumption as to digital signature certificates; (j) section 88-A - presumption as to electronic messages; (k) section 89 - presumption as to due execution etc., of documents not produced; (l) section 90-A - presumption as to

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (Kptcl) vs Mrs. Rekha

Court : Karnataka

findings of the learned Single Judgeare contrary to the report of the Electrical Inspector under Section 161 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Electrical Inspector in his report dated 31.05.2018 (Annexure-E) hasheld that the accident occurred due to the negligence … of the Report. It was stated that, as per the Report, the Respondent No. 1 did not - 89 - touch the line, and the broom accidently came in contact with the arcing zone due to which

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … & 16929-16940/2017, W.P.Nos.20454-20465/2017, W.P.Nos.26337-26348/2017, W.P.Nos.26361-26372/2017, W.P.Nos.26779-26790/2017, W.P.Nos.26899-26910/2017, W.P.Nos.27451/2017 & Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters Kirloskar Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 2/123 32900-32910/2017, W.P.Nos.10544/2017 & 10977- 10987/2017, W.P.Nos.14220-14231/2017, … Electric Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. 89/123 (a) In State of Karnataka Vs. K. Bond Polymers Pvt. Ltd. (

Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under this Act. 28 defines Generating Electricity Act, 2003 Section 2 relates to definitions Sub-Section Company which reads as under:-"Generating Company means any company or body corporate or … legislature has power to make the provision retrospectively. In R.C. India [R.C. Tobacco (P) Ltd. v. Union of 89 Tobacco (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, (2005) 7 SCC725 , this Court stated broad legal principles while

Sitapuram Power Limited and Another Vs. Transmission Corporation of An ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Kusumam Hotels (P) Ltd. Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Kerala Buildings Tax Act, 1975; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 22B, 56, 56(2), 61, 185 and 185(5); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 78A; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 25(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2008SC2796; 2008LC(SC)293; 2008(3)KLT276; 2008(9)SCALE448; 2008AIRSCW4638; AIR2008SC2796; 2008(4)Supreme214; 2008(4)LH(SC)2691

still considered to be an industry.(iii) In view of the provisions in Sub-section (2) of Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003, no bill could have been raised after a period of two years.13. Mr. George, learned Counsel appearing on

A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. R.V.K. Energy Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(4), 13(5), 14, 14(1), 14(4), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 21, 21(4), 26, 39 and 41(1); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4)(A), 2(5), 2(6), 3, 18A, 18A(2), 26A, 43A and 43A(1); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 3 and 28; Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 10(2), 14 and 42(2); Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Reform Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 14, 14(1), 16, 33 and 37(1); Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Second Order, 2005; Electricity (Supply) Rules; Indian Electricity Rules; Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Regulations

Reported in : 2008LC(SC)550; JT2008(7)SC138; 2008(9)SCALE529; 2008AIRSCW6536

and powers of the licensees. Section 21 imposes restrictions on licensees and generating companies.77. The Parliament enacted Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (in short 2003 Act). Sub-section (2) of Section 10 of the said Act enables a generating company to

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Vs. Everest Tube Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

the court below that suit is not within limitation in view of Sub-section (2) of Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is not sustainable in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kusumam Hotels Private Limited