Advanced Search Results
M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-13-2006
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 37, 42, 43, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5) and 75; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 12; States Reorganisation Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 32; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 131; Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962; General Clauses Act - Sections 14; Imports and Exports Control Act
JT2006(8)SC629; 2006(9)SCALE194; (2006)10SCC736
Board and in particular in ignoring the provisions contained in the proviso appended to Section 131 of the Electricity Act, 2003.(iv) Apportionment of assets and liabilities pursuant to fixation of cut-off date as 15.11.2000 had caused serious prejudice to … generation, transmission and supply of electric power in both the successor States safeguards should also be provided Under Section 75 of the Madhya Pradesh Reorganization Act.21. Yet again the Chief Secretary of the Government of Madhya Pradesh by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimran Wind Project Private Limited and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electric ...
Chennai
Jul-15-2016
Land Acquisition
as being arbitrary, illegal and ultra vires the powers of the TNERC and contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the applicable CERC regulations.) 1. The writ petitions have been filed to declare that the Tamil Nadu … gap between the conventional energy price and renewable energy price is bridged. The Tariff Policy, 2006 and the section 86 (1) of the act enabled the appropriate commissions to fix the minimum purchase of electricity from renewable … energy Purchase Obligation Regulations, 2010 on 16.10.2010 by fixing a cap at 75% of the preferential tariff fixed by the commission on the purchases from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commis ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-27-2005
Electricity
Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(10), 2(22), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(32), 2(36), 2(49), 2(50), 2(67), 2(75), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 14, 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(4), 40, 42, 42(2), 49, 62(1), 76 to 109, 158, 176, 181, 391 and 391(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Act, 2003; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 3
AIR2006AP12; 2005(6)ALD368
petitions.2. O.P.(SR) No. 19 of 2004 was filed by A.P. Transmission Corporation Limited (A.P.TRANSCO) under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for brevity) seeking orders from APERC to direct APGPCL to allocate surrendered energy to A.P.TRANSCO from
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Torrent Power Limited versus U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission &a ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2025
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 693
u/s.128 can only happen in respect of a distribution licensee and not its franchisee. [Paras 71, 72, 73, 75]Electricity Act, 2003 - s.128 - Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Electricity Ombudsman) Regulations, … Torrent Power Limited v. U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.1. This statutory appeal filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act,2003 arises from the judgment and order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi (“APTEL”) dated 28.07.2016
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Roshan Rai vs the State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Mar-24-2026
wherein this Court observed considered similar challenges relating to approval under Section 68, delegation under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as the laying of transmission lines. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court also observed the findings … functions and duties as the Central Government may prescribe or direct. The delegation of power is traceable to Section 75 of the Act, 2003 which enables the Central Government to issue direction as specified thereunder.5. On behalf of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.
Delhi
Dec-14-2005
Civil
Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta
126(2006)DLT49
Electricity Rules, 1956 and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.(d) Whether till regulations are framed under Section 55 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by the authority, the distribution company has authority to determine what would be a correct meter.27. The aforesaid … 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (Central Act 54 of 1948) to the extent this Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Jaiprakash Power Ventures Limited, (U.P.) Vs. Haryana Electricity ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Jul-20-2012
Land Acquisition
the jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the dispute under Section 86 (1) (b) and Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 between Generating Company, the Appellant and the Distribution Licensee, Haryana Power (R-2) over a Power Purchase Agreement dated … the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity in Appeal No.200 of 2009 dated 23rd February, 2011 (i) (2008) 4 SCC 755, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Versus Essar Power Limited 8. The Learned Senior Counsel for the R-2 has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.P. Gas Power Corpn. Ltd. Vs. A.P. State Regulatory Commission and or ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-23-2004
Commercial
Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 11(1), 12, 13, 14, 14(4), 15, 16, 21(4) and 56(3); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(6), 5 to 18, 18A, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1926; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 to 19 and 28; Electricity Rules, 1956; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Duty) Act, 1952; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Consumption and Use) Order, 1977; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2
AIR2004SC3090; JT2004(3)SC600; 2004(3)SCALE616; (2004)10SCC511
1926 - Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 - 19, 28 - Electricity Rules, 1956 - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2 - State Government of Andhra Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh Electricity Board entering into Memorandum of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKarnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (Kptcl) vs Mrs. Rekha
Karnataka
Jan-23-2025
findings of the learned Single Judgeare contrary to the report of the Electrical Inspector under Section 161 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Electrical Inspector in his report dated 31.05.2018 (Annexure-E) hasheld that the accident occurred due to the negligence … 33. 34.4. The above position is reiterated in Parvati Devi -Vs.- Commissioner of Police Delhi [2000 (3) SCC 754] at para 2. 34.5. The counsel stated, the principle was specifically laid down in regard to cases of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeta Wind Farm (P) Limited Chennai and Others Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrici ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
May-24-2013
Land Acquisition
respect of Wind Energy has been given in the Regulations 2008 as well as in Section 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 33. Let us now refer to those Regulations and provisions of the Act,2003. 34. The relevant Regulation is … are using their energy for captive use as well as for 3rd party sale and the distribution licensees. 75. The Relevant articles of the agreement entered between M/s. Beta Wind Farm (P) Ltd. (the Appellant) and TANGEDCO
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »