Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the electricity act 2003 section 72 · Page 1 of about 1,458 results (0.103 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 28 2008

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

Board has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, with regard to … Act.2. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board has filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2011

P.Nachimuthu and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-2011

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 180, 68(1), 183, 176(2)(e); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6 to 12; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10

the Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003: 27.Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2007

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Nov-23-2007

Subject : MRTP

of the fourth proviso to Section 14 and effect of Sections 61, 62 and the relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short Act of 2003) on the provisions of the DVC Act, 1948 having a bearing on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 28 2008

Mula Pravara Electric Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL135

societies engaged in distribution of electricity in a rural area under cooperative principles, in the manner envisaged in The Electricity Act, 2003 and the Rural Electrification Policy dated August 23, 2006 issued by the Central Government and thereafter direct that … that billed by MSEDC.15. Learned Counsel pleaded that the Commission has failed to appreciate its jurisdictional mandate under Section 5 and 6 of The Electricity Act, 2003 and the regulatory impetus envisaged under the Rural Electrification Policy … deficit of the appellant by taking into consideration the amount of Rs. 72 crores to be paid by the Government and the balance deficit of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2005

Hasi Mazumdar and anr. Vs. the West Bengal State Electricity Board and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-25-2005

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 43A, 126, 126(1), 126(6) and 135; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 72

Reported in : AIR2006Cal59

and 29th December, 2003. It would be appropriate to notice the said note sheet in extenso.Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 has stipulated the basis of assessment of bill to be served upon the person if he is found … amount to unjust enrichment which is not permissible under the Indian Contract Act. The second statutory illustration to Section 72 of the Contract Act would further make the legal position clear.A railway company refuses to deliver up certain

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Central Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

Electricity Rules, 1956 and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.(d) Whether till regulations are framed under Section 55 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by the authority, the distribution company has authority to determine what would be a correct meter.27. The aforesaid … 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (Central Act 54 of 1948) to the extent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2009

Calendula Realtors Private Limited Vs. Cesc Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-25-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(20), 2(22), 2(40), 2(61), 2(72), 39(1), 51, 67, 68, 68(3), 68(5), 69, 164 and 173 to 175; ;Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 16(1) and 17; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 51; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144; ;Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Section 3(1); ;West Bengal Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3 and 3(4)

the Companies Act, 1956 and a licensee engaged in the business of distribution and generation of electricity, under the Electricity Act, 2003; And, whereas CESC is required to establish distribution system and to undertake supply of electricity through its distribution … maintained are required to be conferred on the CESC. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 the CESC is hereby authorized to exercise all the powers vested in … on contiguous premises supplied from the same point of the distributing main; 72) 'transmission lines' means all high pressure cables and overhead lines (not being

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2025

Municipal Corporation of Delhi versus Gagan Narang & Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-02-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.239

January 2025 [B.R. Gavai* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether the application under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 could have been made by the Appellant-MCD, a “local authority” within the meaning of Section 2(41) of the … approval was to be given by it. 2.6 Pursuant to the same, the Appellant-MCD filed a Petition No. 72 of 2022 before the DERC for the approval of the bidding process of the Project. 2.7 The DERC,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2004

A.P. Gas Power Corpn. Ltd. Vs. A.P. State Regulatory Commission and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 - Sections 3, 11(1), 12, 13, 14, 14(4), 15, 16, 21(4) and 56(3); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(6), 5 to 18, 18A, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1926; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 to 19 and 28; Electricity Rules, 1956; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Duty) Act, 1952; Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Consumption and Use) Order, 1977; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2004SC3090; JT2004(3)SC600; 2004(3)SCALE616; (2004)10SCC511

1926 - Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 - 19, 28 - Electricity Rules, 1956 - Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 2 - State Government of Andhra Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh Electricity Board entering into Memorandum of … 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 - 27, 37, 40 - 45, 46 - 54, 56 - 69, 72 ,75 - 83 - Electricity (Supply) Act, 1926 - Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial