Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the electricity act 2003 section 65 · Page 1 of about 1,680 results (0.091 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2004

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17(5), 27 and 29; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 45, 49 and 59

Reported in : AIR2004Bom294; 2004(3)BomCR485

State is now bound to make good the loss by subsidy under Section 65 of the Electricity Supply Act, 2003. The Commission has recorded a finding of fact that both the appellant Board and consumers are responsible for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2008

Salem Textiles Limited 'B' unit rep. by Its General Manager (Tech), Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-02-2008

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007 - Sections 2(7); Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(2A), 2(7), 2(8), 3, 3(1), 6, 20 and 20(1); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5), 66(3) and 68; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1)

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ844

under Tamil Nadu Act 32 of 1991 as well as Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 were dismissed, against which appeals were filed and the same were also dismissed by the Division Bench on … object of the Finance Act, 2003, which has in effect amended Section 65(5), 66(3) and 68 of Finance Act, 1994 was to nullify the earlier … in law, by virtue of the validating Act, viz., Act 38 of 2007, the definition 'consumption charge' in Section 2(7) is substituted including within it, the charge on maximum demand and power factor surcharge and therefore, it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2003

Gini Vitreous Private Limited Vs. the Central Electricity Supply Co. o ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-12-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 26(6); Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission Distribution (Conditions of Supply) Code, 1998

Reported in : 2003(II)OLR73

Matched in: Citation 2003(II)OLR73

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 28 2014

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-28-2014

Subject : Education

allowed the licensee to bridge the revenue gap through the government grant/subsidy given by the State Government under Section 65 of the Electricity Act, 2003? J. whether the State Commission has wrongly withdrawn the load-factor rebate on the … Member. 1. The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2022

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

use being not by any artificial means or through the tampered meter, the assessment under Section 126(6) of the Electricity Act 2003 (for short, ‘the Act 2003’) could only be called to twice the fixed charges payable and such consumer … 62 (Determination of tariff), Section 63 (Determination of tariff by bidding process), Section 64 (Procedure for tariff order), Section 65 (Provision of subsidy by the State Government) and Section 66 (Development of market). In terms of Section 61,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2008

Tenughat Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Bihar State Re-organisation Act, 2000 - Sections 3, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(3), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 65, 67 and 91; Companies Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Income Tax Act; Punjab Re-organization Act, 1966; Banking Act, 1970; Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2; Factories Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 19, 21, 131, 300A and 311

as a company incorporate to act as a generating company under provisions of the Indian Companies Act and the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. TVNL with registered office at Patna was incorporated as a company and a certificate of … is no dispute that a large number of statutes such as Banking Act of 1970, Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, Civil Procedure Code (Order-39 Rule-2), Factories Act etc contain the expressions- 'company owned by Government'. But this itself … issue directions notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Companies Act or any other law are covered by Section 65 of the Act which occurs in part-VII and hence by implication it should be held that part (VI)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

Mula Pravara Electric Vs. Maharashtra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL135

giving further reasoning and sustenance of the orders. Learned Counsel asserted that MERC, in exercise of powers under Section 65 of The Electricity Act, 2003, has not acted upon the GR dated May 27, 2005 issued by the … societies engaged in distribution of electricity in a rural area under cooperative principles, in the manner envisaged in The Electricity Act, 2003 and the Rural Electrification Policy dated August 23, 2006 issued by the Central Government and thereafter direct that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2014

Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ld. andor Vs. M/S Adarsh Textiles an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2014

Subject : MRTP

Government also did not spell out compliance of the advance subsidy payment as envisaged under Section 65 of the Electricity Act, 2003. While dealing with the matter, the Commission observed that billing of the power loom be done strictly in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2011

Polyplex Corporation Limited, Uttarakhand and Others Vs. Uttrakhand El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

Subject : MRTP

and methodology specified by the Central Commission for determination of tariff applicable to Generating Companies and Transmission Licensees. Section 65 of the Electricity Act, 2003 also provides that no direction of the State Government regarding grant of subsidy … on the basis of the policy directions issued by the State Government dated 25.09.2009 under section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has determined the tariff by bifurcating the power purchase cost for supply to different categories of consumers in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2014

C.i.T., Jabalpur Vs. M/S. J.P. Tobacco Product Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2014

Subject : MRTP

Government also did not spell out compliance of the advance subsidy payment as envisaged under Section 65 of the Electricity Act, 2003. While dealing with the matter, the Commission observed that billing of the power loom be done strictly in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial