Advanced Search Results

Shri Padmakar Balkrishna Samant Meghdoot and Others Vs. Maharashtra St ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Commission for short) arrayed as respondent No.1 on the ground that it contradicts Sections 41 and 51 of The Electricity Act, 2003. The appellant also seeks certain directions on the respondent No.2, a distribution licensee in the area falling within … Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (the Commission for short) arrayed as respondent No.1 on the ground that it contradicts Sections 41 and 51 of The Electricity Act, 2003. The appellant also seeks certain directions on the respondent No.2,

Vijay Nath Mishra @ Vijendra Nath Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar and Ot ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Land Acquisition

œ(i) For quashing of the F.I.R., bearing Alamganj P.S. Case No. 315 of 2012, registered under Section-135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground of being not maintainable as the same has been … vitiate the seizure of the articles. In Sunder Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1956 Supreme Court 411 Supreme Court held that irregularity cannot vitiate the trial unless the accused has been prejudiced by the defect

Chattisgarh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh Vs. Chattisgarh State Electr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 3, 10(2), 12, 14, 15, 41, 43, 86(4), 111 and 142; Code of Conduct Rules, 2005 - Rule 3(2)

Reported in : 2008(1)MhLj540; 2008MPLJ232(SC); 2007(11)SCALE278; (2007)8SCC208; 2007AIRSCW7060

179 of 2005, 188 of 2005, 16 of 2006 and 27 of 2006 preferred under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short the Act). In the aforesaid appeals, the appellants have challenged the order dated 29.11.2005 passed by … contend that the grant of license in favour of respondent No. 2 would also offend the provisions of Section 41 proviso 3 and Section 86(4) of the Act. In this connection, counsel has taken us to the grounds

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Viniyamak Bhavan, C-Block, Shivalik, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi - 110 017 Sub: Directions under Section 108 of the Electricity Act, 2003 regarding disruption in electricity supply to consumers and compensation payable in respect thereof. Sir, Considering the very large … deciding objections under Section 100(2) must be discharged by the Lt. Governor himself. It is contended that under Section 41 of the GNCTD Act, 1991, the Lt. Governor shall act in his discretion in a matter which is

Siju Punnose Kerala Vs. the Kerala State Electricity Board, Vydyuthi B ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Subject : Consumer

Forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute with respect to issuance of provisional assessment under Section.126 of the Electricity Act , 2003. They also denied the alleged deficiency of service on their part. It was also contended that the provisional … complaint as not maintainable? 2. Whether Forum below is having the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint in C.C. 41/08? 6. Points 1and 2:- Appellant/complainant is a consumer under the opposite party K.S.E.B. He has been provided with

Secretary, West Bengal State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Deb Kumar ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 2(2), 2(7), 2(11A), 2(12) and 41; ;Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 43 and 46; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 2

Reported in : 2005(4)CHN24

Act, viz. Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, was in force. Ld. counsel further submitted that after the new Act, the Electricity Act, 2003, came into force, the statutory position has undergone a sea change and as a result of which previous … provisions of Sub-sections (2), (7), (11A), and (12) of Section 2 of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 as also Section 41 of the 1948 Act. Apart from that the ld. Judge was considering supply in connection with domestic consumption.4.

Gmr Energy Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions of Comp ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(5), 2(15), 2(19), 2(23), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(33), 2(39), 2(47), 2(70), 2(72), 3, 6, 7, 8, 8(3), 9, 10, 10(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12 to 24, 25 to 41, 42 to 60, 61 to 66, 73, 79, 86(1), 108(1) and 178; ;Companies Act; ;Indian Electricity Act, 1910; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; ;Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; ;Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007; ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 301, 302, 303 and 304; ;Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Power Procurement from Renewable Sources for Distribution Licensee) Regulations, 2004; ;Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Open Access in inter-State Transmission) Regulations, 2008 - Regulations 6, 9, 14, 15 and 28

relating to finer aspects of the National Policy on Power which finds statutory recognition and as reflected in the Electricity Act, 2003 and its ramifications, in so far as the obligation of the Government to encourage private sector participation, delicensing … these Writ Petitions the petitioners are challenging the Government Order dated 30.12.2008 passed by the State Government under Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') directing them to operate … 4354.35 1534.39February 2009 6179.03 4354.35 1824.68March 2009 8013.15 4271.41 1741.74April 2009 5764.33 4188.47 1575.86May 2009 5681.39 4188.47 1482.926. The expected annual, increase in demand is

Kerala State Electricity Board vs Gopalakrishnan

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

for theremoval of the electric line near and in the plaint schedule property. As per Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003, it is mandatory for a distribution licensee to develop and maintain an efficient, coordinated, and economical distribution system … the jurisdiction of the District Magistrate. The Learned Counsel further submitted that the suit is barred under Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act, as the plaintiff is having effective alternate remedy before the District Magistrate. st14.

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.13451/2015 T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … appointment was issued on 31.12.2013 whereafter he assumed office on 9.1.2014. Page 41 of 84 48. The impugned decision of the Madras High Court opining … of the said Act deals with matters relating to Regulatory Commissions - their constitution, powers and functions, etc. Sections 76 & 77 of the said Act are concerned with the constitution of the Page 4 of 84

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd vs Fatik Chandra Ghosh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

ofissues pertaining to any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of anypower conferred by or under the Electricity Act, 2003 (‘Electricity Act’) is barred in terms of the provisions of Electricity Act.Brief Facts5. Respondent/plaintiff is the owner and … in plaint could also not have been granted as in terms ofSection 41 (h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, wherein an injunction cannot be … is that the Trial Court has exercised jurisdictionnot vested in it by law and thus in terms of Section 115 of CPC has prayed that the proceedings in CS SCJ No. 324 of 2021 titled “Fatik Chandra