Advanced Search Results

K.N. Ram @ Kedar Nath Ram Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Electricity Act - Sections 34, 39, 44 and 152; Indian Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 135, 152, 152(2) and 152(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 378 and 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300; Constitution of India - Article 20

prescribed in the statute, which creates the offence and regulate the punishment. In this connection Part XIV of the Electricity Act, 2003 creates the offence and regulates the punishment. Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 defines theft of electricity … presumed to be correct, no case is made out under Section 379 of the I.P.C, as well as Section 34 and 44 of the Bihar Electricity Act. It is contended that the F.I.R, is not sustainable in the

M/S Classic Developers, Bangalore, Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sushil ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply and Distribution) Code 2000-2001 with effect from 29/3/2001; and (5) Sec.56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (6) Rule 53(d) under Part-III Schedule-II of Procedure for Recovery of Tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961 … in any other law for the time being in force, no sum due from any consumer, under this section shall be recoverable after the period of two years from the date when such sum became first due

Apseb and ors. Vs. Neenavath Bhuli @ Lakshmi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(61); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD476; 2007(4)ALT664

the exclusive privilege of the appellants. The definition of 'service line' under Sub-section (61) of Section 2 of the Electricity Act, 2003, supports this.8. Once it has emerged that the electrocution occurred on account of hanging of the wire from … same.9. The trial Court granted interest at 12% per annum. Basically, the rate of interest provided for under Section 34 C.P.C., must not exceed 6% per annum. It is only where the transactions are commercial, in nature, the

Tdi International India Ltd vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

while mentioning that the lease out will be activated from 01.06.2004, and the Respondents were obliged to provide the electricity supply.9. Thereafter, between July 2004 and March 2005, several letters were exchanged between the parties regarding the electricity … Mr. Ankit Bhushan, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 34 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 26.02.20102 rendered by the learned Sole Arbitrator

Nagegowda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

(In this judgment the words the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 ?, wherever they occurs should be read as Electricity Act, 2003 ?), and appellant-accused 1 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.5,000/- and … Special Court, the learned Sessions Judge has framed charges for the offences punishable under Section 304 read with Section 34 of IPC and also under Section 135(1)(a) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. The accused has pleaded not

Kumaran Chemicals (P) Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Partner D. Thillairaj ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 122 to 185; ;Indian Panel Code - Sections 34 and 379; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 173

have been registered against the petitioners for offences under Sections 379 r/w 34 IPC r/w Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 relating to the alleged theft of electricity. The occurrence of theft is said to be in the year

Classic Developers, Bangalore, Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sushil Man ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka Electricity Board (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1976; Karnataka Electricity Board (Recovery of Dues) Rules, 1978; Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 56(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Rule 53(d); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 55(g); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49, 79

Reported in : 2012(2)KarLJ73; 2012(2)KantLJ73; ILR2012KAR1572

the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply & Distribution) Code 2000-2001 with effect from 29/3/2001; and(5) Sec.56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003(6) Rule 53(d) under Part-III Schedule-II of Procedure for Recovery of Tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961(7) Sec.55(g) … in any other law for the time being in force, no sum due from any consumer, under this section shall be recoverable after the period of two years from the date when such sum became first due

Public Work Department (Govt. of Delhi) Through Its Office Executive E ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

41CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The Objection Petition, being O.M.P. (COMM.) 207/20171,has been instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19962, seeking setting aside of the Arbitral Award dated 26.10.2016, as revised … reserved on: 04.05.2026Judgment pronounced on: 21.05.2026+ OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 46/2018 & I.A. 4165/2018 (U/O XXI Rule 41(2) BUDHIRAJA ELECTRICALS .....Decree Holder Through: Ms. Kirti Mewar, AdvocateversusPUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr.

Tdi International India Ltd vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the date of notice for takeover of the first panel, whichever was earlier, subject to the provision of electricity to the concerned panel.6. Pursuant to the LoA, the Petitioner submitted the required location layout plans on 16.11.2006 … Mr. Ankit Bhushan, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, challenging the Award dated 19.02.20102 passed by

Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited vs Anand Engineering Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

including the Project Contract GPT O.M.P. (COMM) 535/2025 Page 5 of 98 Authority Certificate 18 and the Central Electricity Authority’s Mega Power Certificate 19 . As per the aforesaid Clause, the said Certificates were to be provided … Mr. Akshat Vachher, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition, has been filed under Section 34 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the setting aside of the Arbitral Award dated 26.07.20252, rendered by