Advanced Search Results

Orissa Power Generation Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Orissa Electricity Reforms Act, 1995 - Sections 10, 11, 11(1), 15A(3), 17, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(4), 21(5), 28, 28(1), 28(2), 29, 29(2), 29(3), 29(5), 30, 30(3), 39, 46, 57, 57(3) and 58; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 43A, 43A(1), 43A(2), 43(1)(2) and 49(3); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 51; Central General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 11; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - Sections 26 and 37; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 185(3); Constitution of India - Article 226; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 1996 - Regulation 110(3); Telecommunication Interconnection Charges and Revenue Sharing (First Amendment) Regulations, 1999;

Reported in : AIR2005Ori125

now been filed by Gridco numbered as case No. 13 of 2002.30. We may mention here that the Electricity Act, 2003 has come into force during the pendency of the writ petition and Section 185(3) thereof provides that the

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD752

Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … to under the proviso to Section 14, after expiry of one year from the commencement of the Act. Section 30 relates to transmission within the State and thereunder the State Commission shall facilitate and promote transmission and supply

Gajendra Haldea Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 9(2), 3(2), 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 14, 14(2), 14(5), 15, 15(4), 16, 20, 20(9), 23, 24, 25, 26(4), 28, 28(2), 28(3), 29(2), 30 to 34, 42 and 60; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49, 50, 57, 57A and 78A; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 29 and 30; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 42(1), 42(2), 42(3), 61, 82(4), 86(2), 131(2), 185 and 185(2); Comptroller and Auditor General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971; Bulk Supply Tariff Order; Constitution of India - Articles 148 and 226; Delhi Electricity Reform Ordinance; Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001

Reported in : 2007(97)DRJ1; 2007LC(DEL)1429

Act, 1998, in the context of the changed policy of privatization of the power sector, the Parliament enacted the Electricity Act 2003 (EA 2003) which was brought into force with effect from 10.6.2003. Even while repealing the aforementioned three enactments, … to do so and in such an event it is not necessary for the Commission to again invoke Section 30 of the 1998 Act because the requirement of invoking Section 30 arises only at the stage of framing

M/S. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited and Others Vs. Odisha Electricit ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

Respondent is the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission). 3. These Appeals have been filed under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the order dated 21.1.2012 passed by the Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Commission) … tariff as per the Judgments of this Tribunal in Appeal Nos. 102, 103 and 112 of 2010 dated 30.05.2011 and in Appeal No. 57, 67-73 of 2011 dated 2.9.2011 and Order dated 30.09.2011 of Honble Supreme Court

A.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 2(8), 2(10), 2(22), 2(28), 2(29), 2(30), 2(32), 2(36), 2(49), 2(50), 2(67), 2(75), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 14, 39, 39(1), 39(2), 39(4), 40, 42, 42(2), 49, 62(1), 76 to 109, 158, 176, 181, 391 and 391(2); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh Act, 2003; Electricity Rules, 2005 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2006AP12; 2005(6)ALD368

petitions.2. O.P.(SR) No. 19 of 2004 was filed by A.P. Transmission Corporation Limited (A.P.TRANSCO) under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for brevity) seeking orders from APERC to direct APGPCL to allocate surrendered energy to A.P.TRANSCO from … not attracted. He relied on A.P. Gas Power Corporation Limited v. A.P. State Regulatory Commission, AIR 2004 SC 3090 : 2003 (4) SCALE 616 : 2004 AILD 259 (SC).6. The learned Senior Counsel, Sri T. Anantha Babu,

Soham Infrastructure Private Limited vs the Karnataka Electricity Regu ...

Court : Karnataka

contrary to the statutory framework governing Open Access, and violative of the mandate contained under Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. The gist of the challenge is that the respondent-Commission, while framing the impugned regulation, has treated the ceiling … without rational basis. In the present case, however, the differentiation betweenESCOM consumers and Open Access consumers is - 30 - expressly recognized by the parent statute itself. The surcharge imposed upon Open Access consumers is not a

Sri. Radhakrishna R. S/O Srinivasaiah, Proprietor of Balaji Ice Factor ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(5) and 127

Reported in : 2009(2)AIRKarR437; ILR2009KAR294; 2009(3)KarLJ516; 2009(3)KLJ516; 2009(1)KCCRSN16

while the order is a proper order, petitioner also has the remedy of appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 [for short 'the Act'].8. While learned Counsel for the respondents -company is right in his submission that the … well as before this court and it is the latest round of such order as per Annexure-C dated 30.5.2008 which is challenged in the present, writ petition where under the demand at the earliest point of time

Solvis Energie India Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

cannot be granted. 12.2. The petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy in terms of Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 wherein the petitioner can approach APTEL as against any order of the KERC. Whenever any statutory appeal is … Judgment of this Court in Aadyaarush Power Projects Pvt. Ltd.-.v- State of Karnataka and others5, more particularly para 30, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:30. The very agreement also stipulates the scheduled commissioning date and the

M/S Sonali Power Equipments Pvt. Ltd. versus Chairman, Maharashtra Sta ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1144

& Ors.It is relevant to note that Lanco (supra) and TANGEDCO (supra) arise in the context of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the applicability of the Limitation Act to arbitrations conducted thereunder.45. In TANGEDCO (supra), a dispute regarding payments … an arbitral award on agreed terms on the substance of the dispute rendered by an arbitral tribunal under Section 30 of the ACA.17. Finally, Section 76 provides for termination of the conciliation proceedings in various circumstances: (i) signing

K.S.E.B. Vs. Najeeb

Court : Kerala

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24, 24(1), 39, 39A, 42 and 44; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(7), 50, 56, 56(2), 126, 126(5), 126(6), 127, 135, 138, 145, 152, 185 and 185(2); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5(1) and 79; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act - Sections 6, 24, 30(1), 30(2) and 185; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 482; Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 30 and 30(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116; Indian Electricity Regulation - Regulations 42 and 43; Electricity Supply Code

Reported in : 2005(1)KLT406

Regulation 42(d) of the Regulations Relating to Conditions of Supply of Electrical Energy or under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is the question that has come up for consideration in this case.2. Writ Petition was preferred Seeking a … the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that as reference made in Sub-section (2) of Section 30 of 1988 Act is only to Section 6 of General Clauses Act, the other provisions of the said