Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the electricity act 2003 section 183 · Page 1 of about 214 results (0.074 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 30 2011

P.Nachimuthu and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-30-2011

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 180, 68(1), 183, 176(2)(e); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 6 to 12; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10

Section 2 would certainly exclude the dedicated transmission line as provided under sub-section 16 of Section 2 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 183 and 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003: 28.Section 183 of the Electricity Act, 2003 speaks about the power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2007

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD752

Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … the case may be, due to the commission of an offence referred to in Sections 135 to 139. Section 183(1) enables the Central Government, if any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of the Electricity Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2007

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy and ors. Vs. Eastern Power Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 13, 50, 56, 56(1), 56(3), 57, 61, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 45(5), 47(1), 48, 49, 49(4), 53, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; A.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005; Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALT580

Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17-3-2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … the case may be, due to the commission of an offence referred to in Sections 135 - 139. Section 183(1) enables the Central Government, if any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of the Electricity Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 03 2009

Abhay Tyagi Vs. State (Delhi Admn.) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-03-2009

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 18, 37, 39, 53 and 67 to 69; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 50, 61, 121, 126, 126(6), 135 to 138, 151, 154, 154(5), 155, 174, 183, 185, 185(2) and 332; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69(1); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 322, 332, 466A, 467 and 469; Delhi Electricity Rules Act, 2005; Delhi Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 2000; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 4(2), 154, 173, 190(1), 195, 195(1), 200, 340 and 482; Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commissions (Performance standards, metering and billing) Regulation, 2002 -

Reported in : 2009LC(DEL)32

in Sohanlal, the Central Government, on 10th day of June 2003, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 183 of the Act, issued Order No. 790(E) dated 8th June 2005 called the Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, … case). It is submitted that in the aforesaid case it was held that there is no provision in the electricity Act, 2003 to suggest that cases of theft of electricity cannot originate from an FIR.9. It has been submitted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2008

Rahdey Shyam Bansal Vs. B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2008

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 152, 152(1), 152(3) and 152(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183(1), 183(2), 184, 186, 189, 194 and 200; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 300, 320 and 482

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT462

an order dated 14th March, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma, Delhi ('Special Judge') under the Electricity Act, 2003 ('Act') in Criminal Complaint No. 217 of 2005 whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 152 … Section 177, Section 178, Section 179, Section 180, Section 181, Section 182, Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) of Section 183, Section 184, Section 186, Section 189 may either before or after the institution of the prosecution, be compounded

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2006

Torrent Power Aec Ltd. Vs. Gayatri Intermediates Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-13-2006

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 1 to 120 and 122 to 185; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(2), 26(6), 39 to 50; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 173; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulations) Act, 2003; Electricity (Supply) Rules, 1948; Electricity Rules, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Electricity Supply Code - Sections 7; Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply code and Related matters) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 7, 7.1 to 7.4, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2 to 7.6.4, 7.6.5 to 7.6.8 and 7.7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1) and 226

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1580

ORDERNew Delhi, the 8th June, 2005.S.O. 790(E) Whereas the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) came into force on the 10th June, 2003 :And … theft of electricity by the distribution licensees;Now, therefore, the Central Government, in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 183 of the Act hereby makes the following order in respect of electricity supply code in terms of Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

2 would certainly exclude the dedicated transmission line as provided under sub-section 16 of Section 2 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 183 and 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003:28. Section 183 of the Electricity Act, 2003 speaks about the power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2006

National Hydroelectric Power Vs. H.P. State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Oct-13-2006

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL730

the Electricity Removal of Difficulty Fourth Order published on 8^th June, 2005 in exercise of power conferred under Section 183 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The said Removal of Difficulty Order has been issued to relieve the generating … Corporation Ltd., an undertaking of the Government of India, has preferred the present appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 seeking to set aside (i) the Order dated 20^th July, 2005 passed by the first Respondent Himachal Pradesh

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2011

In the Matter of Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Vs. Mah ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-31-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

with this issue, it is necessary to understand the full meaning and effect of Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 62(3) reads as under:  “62. Determination of Tariff - (3) The Appropriate Commission shall not while determining the … the observations made in the judgment within the next 8 weeks. The Commission in its application i.e. IA 183 of 2009 has asked for extension of time to carry out the re-determination as directed by us. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2014

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-28-2014

Subject : Education

Member. 1. The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in … Rs. 73.12 crore and Rs. 104.47 crore for FY 2006-07, FY 2007-08 and FY 2008-09 respectively with Rs. 183.70 crore and Rs. 33.50 crore being the amount of carrying cost for 1.5 years period only as against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial