Advanced Search Results

Molay Kumar Acharya Vs. Chairman-cum-managing Director, W.B. State Ele ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(39) and 43; ;Poor Relief (Ireland) Act, 1838 - Sections 71 and 124; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 144(2)

Reported in : AIR2008Cal47,2008(3)CHN27

has filed the aforementioned Suit for the eviction of her brother, i.e. the petitioner.12. Under Section 43 of the Electricity Act 2003, the 'Licensee' defined under Section 2(39) of the Act, has the duty to supply electricity on an Application … submitted by Mr. Bidyut Banerjee himself and which reads as follows:(21) 'Person in actual occupation-' Section 71, 'Occupier', Section 124, Poor Relief (Ireland) Act, 1838)(1 & 2 Vict. c. 56), see Middleton v. M'Donnell (1896) 2 IR 228;

Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

And 12 other cases Karnataka before the enactment of the Karnataka Electricity Regulations, 1999 (“the KER, 1999”) and the Electricity Act, 2003 (“the Electricity Act” or “the Act”).5. They had also entered into agreements with the Government of Karnataka which … 3 . STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTER MANAGED BY KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, A NODAL AGENCY ESTABLISHED UNDER SECTION31OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT2003HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SLDC, RACECOURSE CROSS ROAD, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560009 EMAIL: [email protected] REPRESENTED BY … frame rules which have the effect of amending the substantive provision itself.-. 124 - NC:2024. KHC:53048 WP No.11235 of 2024 C/W WP No.22770 of 2023

Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTERMANAGED BY KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, A NODAL AGENCY ESTABLISHED UNDER SECTION 31 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT 2003 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SLDC, RACECOURSE CROSS ROAD, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560009 EMAIL: [email protected] REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF … matter, another rule-making authority cannot frame rules which have the effect of amending the substantive provision itself. - 124 -148. If the impugned Rules framed by the Central Governmentare accepted, then the aspect of providing open access

In the Matter of : Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Vs. Rajasthan Ele ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

these sections have anything similar or analogous to the provisions of sub section 92) of section 56 of Electricity Act 2003. Section 455 of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Act provides for a method of recovery of certain dues. The Corporation … by the State Government of Rajasthan, has challenged the order dated 13 Apr. 07 in Review Petition No. 124 of 2007 and original order dated 04 Nov. 2006 in Petition No. 100 of 2006 passed by Rajasthan

Eswari vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

dated 10.06.2024 and “Impugned Authorization” given by the 2nd respondent to the 4th respondent under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, published in the Gazette of India dated 22.10.2024 with respect to the Power Transmission Project namely “230 kV … of India an ostensible make-believe compliance of the procedure that has resulted in the impugned license underPage No.54/61 Section 124 of the Act being granted. Thus, the impugned order is liable to be quashed.8.16. Two submissions are made

Shanti Cement (P) Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : AIR2009Jhar63; 2009(57)BLJR1774; 2009LC(JH)332; [2009(1)JCR622(Jhr)]

case relates to a case of defective meter and the proceeding initiated in terms of Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is void.2. The petitioner being a Company engaged in manufacture of Cement, has obtained a H.T. Electric connection … has obtained a H.T. Electric connection from the Respondent- Electricity Board and is availing a contract demand of 124 K.V.A. of electric energy. The Meter installed for the purpose of recording the unit consumption within the Factory

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL310

Appellate Tribunal, it shall see that its representative or Presenting Officer appears and make submissions as provided in Section 124 of the Electricity Act, 2003 or it may submit a memo as to the stand it may take … The Electricity Act, 2003, to exercise such functions and perform such duties as are assigned to it under The Electricity Act, 2003. Section 73 of The Electricity Act, 2003 enumerates the functions and duties of the first Respondent. Such functions are

Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited., Hyderabad and Others Vs. Karnataka Electric ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : MRTP

Appeal filed against its order. This plea is not valid on the ground that Sub Section 2 of Section 124 of the Electricity Act, 2003 provides for presentation of the case with respect to any appeal before the … Appellants since the procurement in question comes within the ambit of Section 79 (1) (b) and (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and so, the Central Commission alone has got the jurisdiction. (b) The Second Issue is as to whether

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

....Appellant(s) versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

M/S S V Global MILL Ltd vs Smt Puttamma Alias Puttathayamma

Court : Karnataka

to ensure safety as imposed by statutes upon the Companies. - 39 -(ii) The following provisions under the Electricity Act,2003 throw light on such duty: • Section 53 (Provisions relating to safety and electricity supply): The Authority may, … community generally. - 27 -xx xx xx xx xx47. However, apart from the principle of strict liability inSection 124-A of the Railways Act and other statutes, we can and should develop the law of strict liability dehors