Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the electricity act 2003 part 2 · Page 1 of about 8,412 results (0.140 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 2006

Krishna Garden Welfare Association Vs. Central Electricity Supply Co. ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-04-2006

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : AIR2007Ori4

of the view that the CESCO (O.P. No. l) has a statutory obligation both under1 Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003 as well as a further obligation in terms of the order of the OERC dated 22.3.2005 (Annexure-20) as … the pleadings in the present proceeding, it is clear that one M/s. Krishna Estate Construction Pvt. Ltd. (opposite party No. 3) promoted the development of an area at Barabari, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar, which is known as Krishna garden … petitioner-Association had applied for plots in the aforesaid complex in the year 2000. In terms of the advertisement, the promoter (opposite party No. 3) entered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Tata Power Trading Co. Limited Vs. the Central Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL698

that this Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction under Section 111(1) and (6) as well as Section 121 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to entertain the appeals and examine the validity of the impugned Regulations and the Regulations impugned could be … and both of us (Mr. H.L. Bajaj, Hon'ble Technical Member and Mr. Justice E Padmanabhan, Judicial Member) were parties to the said full Bench Judgment.9. Without admitting the appeals this Appellate Tribunal called upon Mr. Dhingra, Chief … for the Respondent in all the appeals.2. In Appeal No. 43 of 2006, the Appellant M/s Tata Power Trading Company Limited has prayed for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2007

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD752

Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … confer any authority to discontinue or disconnect power supply or call upon the consumer to pay even a part of the provisionally assessed amount till a final assessment is made and it is only after a final … ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. W.P. No. 3211 of 2006 was filed seeking to have the provisional assessment notice dated 17.02.2006, issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 2007

Raj Electricals (Regd.) Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Sections 9 and 34; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3, 12 to 18, 37, 53 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 185 and 185(3); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 69 and 69(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Haryana Electricity Reform Act, 1997; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998; Orissa Electricity Reform Act, 1995; Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1999; Karnataka Electricity Reform Act, 1999; Rajasthan Electricity Reform Act, 1999; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 20; Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Sudhar Adhiniyam, 2000; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganisation and Regulation) Act, 200

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR449(Delhi); 142(2007)DLT687

thus, clear that in order to create a licensee in terms of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 provisions of part 2 of the Act comprising of Section 3 and other Sections are to be followed. If these provisions are … Act, 1910 was still relevant and applicable in case of the petitioner. He relied upon Section 185 of The Electricity Act, 2003 which reads as under:185. Repeal and Saving- (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the Indian Electricity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2012

Reliance Infrastructure Limited, (Formerly Reliance Energy Limited), M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-30-2012

Subject : Electricity

2009-10. "The Commission, in exercise of the powers vested in it under Section 61 and Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (EA 2003) and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, and after taking into consideration all the … under the Companies Act, 1956 in its 4-page order dated 9th September, 2010 passed in case no 121 of 2008. 2. Maintainability of the appeal … When the appeal was being heard continuously for a number of days the learned counsels for both the parties would for the sake of convenience and also, of course, in lighter vein term the appeal as a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2012

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2007

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy and ors. Vs. Eastern Power Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 13, 50, 56, 56(1), 56(3), 57, 61, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 45(5), 47(1), 48, 49, 49(4), 53, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; A.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005; Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALT580

Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17-3-2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … confer any authority to discontinue or disconnect power supply or call upon the consumer to pay even a part of the provisionally assessed amount till a final assessment is made and it is only after a final … ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. W.P. No. 3211 of 2006 was filed seeking to have the provisional assessment notice dated 17-02-2006, issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2007

Ajay Munjal Memorial Trust and ors. Vs. Power Grid Corporation of Indi ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-07-2007

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 51, 67, 67(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 176(2) and 185; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 51; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 15; Indian Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42; Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar34; 2007(2)BLJR1798; [2007(3)JCR254(Jhr)]

lines over their land 4. Respondent No. 1 is a Central Government Company and is a Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Licensee for short). The Licensee is required to establish transmission system and to undertake transmission of electricity … R.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parties at length for final disposal.2. Petitioners' contention is that the respondents cannot use their land/part of it for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2013

In the Matter Of: Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation L ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Nov-11-2013

Subject : Education

of the dispute in question squarely falls within the jurisdiction of the Central Commission under Section 79(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 which covers the disputes involving an inter-State Transmission System Licensee and another Licensee in the matter of regulation … jurisdiction to adjudicate upon a dispute between two Licensees relating to charges for operation and maintenance of a part of inter-State transmission system which is owned by one of the Licensees and operated and maintained by the … on behalf of the former is the issue raised in these Appeals. 2. The Appellant Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd, (“TANGEDCO”) is a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2017

Energy Watchdog Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-11-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

from Civil Appeal No.5348 of 2016, namely Prayas (Energy) Group vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission.2. Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 provides for procurement of power and determination of tariff by a transparent competitive bidding process. Once this is … notice inviting proposals for supply of power on long term basis under three different competitive bid processes. The participating bidders were to decide on the tariff and quote such tariff after competing against each other. The bidders

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial