Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the drta schedule 4 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.012 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 20 1988

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-1988

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … reference dated March 17, 1988 expressing than an industrial dispute in respect of the matter specified in the schedule existed between the Management of D.T.C. and its six named Unions and the same was referred for adjudication

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1948

The Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Vs. the Great Eastern Life ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-14-1948

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR938

2(h) it would seldom be possible in the ease of a life insurance business to find 'more reliable drta' within Rule 8.;In the case of a life assurance business of a non-resident company, the consolidated statement of … under Rules 25 and 85 of the old Indian Income-tax Rules, but under the rules contained in the schedule to the Amending Act of 1939.4. Section 3 of the Act, which is the charging section, draws no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2005

R.N. Katyal and ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45 and 46; Road Transport Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4 and 4E; Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 480, 516, 516(1) and 516(2); unicipal Corporation Act; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 5

Reported in : 2005(85)DRJ465

placed on Regulation 5 of the D.R.T.A. (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as `the DRTA Regulations).9. Sixty seven officers of the DTC, under the banner of the DTC Engineering Association, had filed Civil … capacity in theTraffic Department or abig Road TransportUndertaking, preferablybig city TransportUndertaking.iii) Special knowledge or anexperience in Planning ofroutes, schedules andallied matters.(Qualifications relaxable atCorporation discretion incase of candidates otherwisewell qualified.)Desirable:Diploma or a certificate of theInstitute of Road Transport … the Selection Committee or without holding proper interview.' In Contempt Case No. 409/2003 the present Petitioners had invoked the Contempt jurisdiction of this Court, but

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 2012

D.T.C. Vs. Tara Chand and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-12-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Instructions and Standing Order governing conduct of DTC employees and Clause No. 19 (f ) and (m) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952 (in short the DRTA Regulations). After the reply of the workman, … the instructions earlier also. The other imputations against the Respondent were included in setting the bus before the scheduled time, refusing to work upto the remaining period, also misbehaving with the Superintendent, on 19th July, 1985, causing … the same was set aside. The Petitioner also impugns the award dated 4th January, 2002 whereby it has been held that the removal of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2012

Rohtash Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, Through Its ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-19-2012

Subject : Education

it to say that re-employment cannot be claimed as a matter of right in terms of Regulation-10 of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952.  As stipulated in office order No.99 dated 4.10.1963 the competent authority … applicant is that when he reported for duty as usual on 27.03.2012 he was refused duty by the Schedule Section at the Deport.  He also submitted a representation to respondent No.2 on 28.03.2012, inter alia, requesting him

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2007

Chander Singh Vs. General Manager, Dtc

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 11A and 33(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; D.R.T.A. (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT32

from duty even without sanction of leave ought to be treated. While referring to the standing orders and the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952 and their applicability to the employees of DTC, the Supreme Court … impugned orders were required to be passed under the Standing Orders in terms of Section 10(1)(d) read with Schedule 2 and 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short `the Act') and not under the D.R.T.A.(Conditions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2003

A.N. Gupta Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board (Pesb) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 311 and 311(2); Disciplinary and Appeal Rules - Rules 9 and 36; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Rugulations 9 and 25(2); Indian Tourism Development Corporation Rules - Rule 31; Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rule 6 and 6(2)

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)364

natural justice as well as Article 14 of the Constitution. It was held that Regulation 9 (b) of the DRTA Regulations which was in pari materia with Rule 9 (i) of the Rules in Central Inland Water Transport … (HUDCO) Ltd., the President is pleased to appoint you to the post of Director (Finance) in HUDCO in Schedule `C' scale of pay of Rs. 22,500-600-27,300/- (revised) in IDA pattern on immediate absorption basis, for a period … to public policy and vocative of Section 23 of the Contract Act. 4. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is submitted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2013

Anil Kumar Vs. the Chairman-cum-md, Delhi Transport Corporation a

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-2013

Subject : Education

duty. Hence your services from this Corporation is hereby terminated with immediate effect under clause 9(a) (i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952.14. On perusal of the record we notice that the disciplinary authority, … to trust them and why the bag was kept by them for 4 days with them and hot words were exchanged with conductor Amit Kumar, … his presence. As per the complaint when the driver and conductor reached Terminal 3 for the next trip scheduled at 10:30, ATI Mahavir Singh asked them about the passenger but they informed him that the passenger had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2014

Karambir Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court No. 1 and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2014

Subject : Labour and Industrial

to follow the provisions of Section 25-N of the Act. She has taken me through the provisions of the DRTA Act with regard to the Retainer-Crew-Driver. Lastly, it was her case that even if the termination is held … framed by the respondent Nos. 2 & 3-Corporation, more particularly, relating to the matters set out in the Schedule to Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, defines a Casual employee to mean an employee whose employment is … SCC497 Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer Public Health Division No.1, Panipat (Haryana) 4. AIR2003SC3553 S.M. Nilajkar & Ors. Vs. Telecom District Manager, Karnataka 5. (3)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial