Advanced Search Results

Shri Radhey Mohan S/O Sh. Kanahya Lal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

for the DTC submitted that those Rules would not be applicable to the applicant as specific provision in the DRTA (Conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952 provided the leave encashment aspects. 18.  There has been reference to … the Tribunal has held that leave lying to the credit as also gratuity has to be paid. 3.   Rule 9(1) of the CCS Leave Rules 1972 reads as under:- “9.  Effect of dismissal, removal of resignation on

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … Shri Same Chand Secretary of the plaintiff/applicant and Upon considering the application (IA No. 1365188) under order 39, Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151 Civil Procedure Code , (copy enclosed) and after hearing Shri Same Chand, … a declaration that the impugned dismissal orders are in violation of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.(2) The Delhi Road Transport Authority Act,

Rohtash Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, Through Its ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

board for 1st extension in the service of this corporation vide memo No.SVD/GO/PFC (Dr.)/2012/331 dated 07.02.2012. As per DRTA rule No.10. In this connection it is stated that above said driver was thoroughly examined by the DTC medical … single Doctor but no response was received from the respondents and thereafter applicant issued a legal notice dated 30.03.2012.  It was on the basis of these facts that this Tribunal has directed the respondents in the earlier

Jage Ram Vs. Dtc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Petitioner was upheld by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal, his services were terminated. Clause 15(2) of the DRTA Regulations provides for the penalties which could be awarded for a misconduct and removal/dismissal from the service are … criminal trial had not culminated to a logical conclusion. The ID Act is the principal Act and any rules of the Respondent made ARE supplementary to it. Thus, this Court is required to look into whether the … GUPTA 1 By the present petition the Petitioner impugns the award dated 31st January, 1996 whereby the dismissal of the Petitioner on account of his

Ravinder Kumar Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

initially on probation for two years. His services were terminated on 02.02.2011 under Clause 9 (a) (I) of the DRTA (conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952. The appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected by an order … took into account his attendance record. The petitioner was found irregular in his duties however, while relying on Rule 9 (a) (I) of the DRTA learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondents were well within their … the present writ petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6818/2015 3. Aggrieved by the order dated 03.02.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal

Balbir Singh, (Asstt., Fitter) Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation Through ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

heard the counsel for the applicants and have been through the pleadings on record. 9. Regulation 14(6) of the DRTA (Condition of Appointment and Service) Rules, 1952 prescribes as under: “14. Holidays and Leave:- (1) for the purpose … have been through the pleadings on record. 9. Regulation 14(6) of the DRTA (Condition of Appointment and Service) Rules, 1952 prescribes as under: “14. Holidays and Leave:- (1) for the purpose of this clause the Delhi Road … the orders passed by the Central Government are applicable to the DTC. 3. The Department of Personnel and Training had issued an O.M. on 27.12.1980

Delhi Transports Corporation & Others vs.sunil Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sciences.3. On 19.07.2013, services of Sunil Kumar was terminated with effect from 17.07.2013 under Clause 9 (a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952 (1952 Regulations, for short). The appeal dated 23.07.2013 filed by Sunil … 9885 & 11452 of 2015 Page 4 of 12 reinstate Amrish Kumar on probation as per the applicable rules, on an alternative post in terms of the provisions of Section 47 (1) of the Persons with Disabilities

Bharat Bhushan Vs Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Road Transport Corporation

Acts : Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 ; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971

about the sickness nor any application/information was ever sent to the respondent and it constitutes misconduct as per the DRTA Rules.13. It is specifically mentioned in para 11 of the written statement that the Enquiry Officer had conducted … sickness nor any application/information was ever sent to the respondent and it constitutes misconduct as per the DRTA Rules.13. It is specifically mentioned in para 11 of the written statement that the Enquiry Officer had conducted the … which he was warned. He was absent from duties w.e.f. 9.2.88 to 3.4.88 without information for which he was reprimanded. He again absented from duty

A.N. Gupta Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board (Pesb) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 311 and 311(2); Disciplinary and Appeal Rules - Rules 9 and 36; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Rugulations 9 and 25(2); Indian Tourism Development Corporation Rules - Rule 31; Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rule 6 and 6(2)

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)364

natural justice as well as Article 14 of the Constitution. It was held that Regulation 9 (b) of the DRTA Regulations which was in pari materia with Rule 9 (i) of the Rules in Central Inland Water Transport … quashing the letter of termination dated 14th December, 2002, terminating the services of the petitioner as Director (Finance). 3. The case set up by the petitioner in the writ petition is that in terms of the guidelines

In the matter of M/s. Magnasound India Ltd. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

basis that the Assignment is void as contrary to Sections 536(2) and 537(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956. 3. The Company in liquidation had sometime in the late 1990s, availed of certain facilities from Union Bank of … the Companyâ™s assets was not within the mischief intended to be remedied by the Section. On the Mischief Rule of Interpretation and the meaning that ought to be attributed to the word âdispositionâ?, he relied on the