Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … Shri Same Chand Secretary of the plaintiff/applicant and Upon considering the application (IA No. 1365188) under order 39, Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151 Civil Procedure Code , (copy enclosed) and after hearing Shri Same Chand,

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.dev Raj Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

19(m) of the Standing Orders governing the conduct of the D.T.C. employees and also under Section 15(2) of the DRTA Act; that although the respondent's absence from work has been recorded as Leave Without Pay by the appellant … present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act, read with Rule 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules, assailing the order dated 27.01.2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'Impugned Order')

D.T.C. Vs. Tara Chand and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Instructions and Standing Order governing conduct of DTC employees and Clause No. 19 (f ) and (m) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952 (in short the DRTA Regulations). After the reply of the workman, … the left side. It is next contended that the two circulars are not conclusive and only incorporate a rule of prudence and do not vitiate the inquiry proceedings. Reliance is placed on DTC vs. Shyam Singh, W.P. … + W.P.(C) 7531/2002 and CM APPL No. 1881/2005 Reserved on:29. h August, 2012 Decided on:12. h December, 2012 % D.T.C. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manish

Ram Phal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulation, 1952 - Regulations 13, 14(10) and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 311

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT452; 2008(105)DRJ18

4 of the Standing Orders governing the Conduct of Employees of DTC and as per Regulation 15 of the DRTA Regulations, 1952, a detailed procedure of charge sheet for obtaining reply from the employees and then holding inquiry … opportunity of putting forward his/her case and an order involving civil consequences must be made consistently with the rules of natural justice. It was held that it is not so much to act judiciously but to act … Transport Corporation, seeks quashing of his dismissal order contained in letters dated 20th September, 1985, 20th May, 1986 and 3rd March, 1987 and he seeks

Rohtash Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, Through Its ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

board for 1st extension in the service of this corporation vide memo No.SVD/GO/PFC (Dr.)/2012/331 dated 07.02.2012. As per DRTA rule No.10. In this connection it is stated that above said driver was thoroughly examined by the DTC medical … forthwith assign duty to the applicant and allow him to discharge his duty regularly without any hindrance/obstruction etc. 2.   In order to decide the matter in issue, few facts may be noticed.  Applicant was employed as a

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Dharam Pal (Ex. Driver)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 44, 45, 46, 47 and 279; ;Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1950; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 516(2); Road Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT555

by Delhi Transport Corporation, the management which reads as under:In accordance with the provisions of Regulation 10 of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952 is framed by the erstwhile DRTA which are still in force … parity with other employees of the Corporation who retires at 60 years. 2. It is an undisputed fact that all the workmen who are, either … as a right to be so re- employed (c) Those who had previously retired according to the normal rules and have subsequently been re-employed shall not be entitled to this benefit. (d) Persons on extension or service

Ravinder Kumar Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

initially on probation for two years. His services were terminated on 02.02.2011 under Clause 9 (a) (I) of the DRTA (conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952. The appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected by an order … took into account his attendance record. The petitioner was found irregular in his duties however, while relying on Rule 9 (a) (I) of the DRTA learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondents were well within their … The appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected by an order dated 26.04.2012. Another appeal filed by him on 03.05.2012 was also rejected on 06.06.2012,

Jage Ram Vs. Dtc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Petitioner was upheld by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal, his services were terminated. Clause 15(2) of the DRTA Regulations provides for the penalties which could be awarded for a misconduct and removal/dismissal from the service are … criminal trial had not culminated to a logical conclusion. The ID Act is the principal Act and any rules of the Respondent made ARE supplementary to it. Thus, this Court is required to look into whether the

Rajpal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33C(2); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 21; Delhi Transport Corporation Act

was declared unfit for service and prematurely retired on medical grounds under para III of clause 10 of the DRTA (Conditions of appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 („DRTA Regulations). The industrial dispute raised by the Petitioner was referred … period of four weeks. It was further directed that pay for the intervening period would be as per Rules. 4. By the impugned order dated 3rd February 1999 DTC offered the Petitioner appointment to the post of … in the scale of peon. The Petitioner also challenges an order dated 25th January 2006 passed by the Labour Court dismissing the Petitioners application under

D.T.C. Vs. Shishu Pal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2(OO) and 25F

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)712; [2000(85)FLR431]

case of deemed resignation in view of the provisions of clause 14(10) (c) read with 14(10) (b) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service). Since no contention was taken before the Labour Court nor any material produced … No rejoinder is filed by the petitioner inspire of various opportunities given and last opportunity given on 2.12.1997. Rule. Respondent workman was employed as Tyre man from May, 1980 and brought on monthly rates of pay with