Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … a resolution dated July 29, 1983, as amended by resolution dated February 16, 1985, the Fourth Pay Commission was set up by the Government of … Shri Same Chand Secretary of the plaintiff/applicant and Upon considering the application (IA No. 1365188) under order 39, Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151 Civil Procedure Code , (copy enclosed) and after hearing Shri Same Chand,

Rohtash Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, Through Its ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

board for 1st extension in the service of this corporation vide memo No.SVD/GO/PFC (Dr.)/2012/331 dated 07.02.2012. As per DRTA rule No.10. In this connection it is stated that above said driver was thoroughly examined by the DTC medical … stated that above said driver was thoroughly examined by the DTC medical board BBM Complex on dated 09.02.2012, 16.02.2012 and 19.03.2012. The medical board declared him medical unfit 19.03.2012. As per office order No.99 the, extract of

Delhi Transports Corporation & Others vs.sunil Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sciences.3. On 19.07.2013, services of Sunil Kumar was terminated with effect from 17.07.2013 under Clause 9 (a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952 (1952 Regulations, for short). The appeal dated 23.07.2013 filed by Sunil … 9885 & 11452 of 2015 Page 4 of 12 reinstate Amrish Kumar on probation as per the applicable rules, on an alternative post in terms of the provisions of Section 47 (1) of the Persons with Disabilities … order dated 12.03.2015 allowing the OA has relied upon the decision dated 16.01.2015 in Shri Pawan Kumars Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2015 (1) LLJ644Delhi and

D.T.C. Vs. Shishu Pal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2(OO) and 25F

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)712; [2000(85)FLR431]

case of deemed resignation in view of the provisions of clause 14(10) (c) read with 14(10) (b) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service). Since no contention was taken before the Labour Court nor any material produced … No rejoinder is filed by the petitioner inspire of various opportunities given and last opportunity given on 2.12.1997. Rule. Respondent workman was employed as Tyre man from May, 1980 and brought on monthly rates of pay with … and brought on monthly rates of pay with effect from 6.5.1981. From 16.6.1987, he absented himself from duties and in these circumstances, invoking provisions of

Shri Radhey Mohan S/O Sh. Kanahya Lal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

for the DTC submitted that those Rules would not be applicable to the applicant as specific provision in the DRTA (Conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952 provided the leave encashment aspects. 18.  There has been reference to … the Tribunal has held that leave lying to the credit as also gratuity has to be paid. 3.   Rule 9(1) of the CCS Leave Rules 1972 reads as under:- “9.  Effect of dismissal, removal of resignation on … the considered opinion that the applicant is not entitled to the gratuity. 16.  We may refer to the next issue pertaining to the applicant’s claim

A.N. Gupta Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board (Pesb) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 311 and 311(2); Disciplinary and Appeal Rules - Rules 9 and 36; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Rugulations 9 and 25(2); Indian Tourism Development Corporation Rules - Rule 31; Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rule 6 and 6(2)

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)364

natural justice as well as Article 14 of the Constitution. It was held that Regulation 9 (b) of the DRTA Regulations which was in pari materia with Rule 9 (i) of the Rules in Central Inland Water Transport … the same was also vocative of the principles of natural justice as well as of Articles 14 and 16(1) of the Constitution of India. In support of his contention, the petitioner has relied upon various judgments mentioned

In the matter of M/s. Magnasound India Ltd. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Companyâ™s assets was not within the mischief intended to be remedied by the Section. On the Mischief Rule of Interpretation and the meaning that ought to be attributed to the word âdispositionâ?, he relied on the … giving 15 days notice to the borrower and either by public auction, private Contract or tenderâ¦â? 4. On 16.7.2002, the above Company Petition came to be filed by the Petitioner Asha Bhosle for winding up the company

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Virender Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : DTRA Rules - Sections 19; Evidence Act - Sections 23(1), 33, 33(1) and 33(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 116(2005)DLT266; 2005(79)DRJ120; [2005(105)FLR188]; (2005)IILLJ402Del; 2006(1)SLJ487(Delhi)

depot manager of the petitioner corporation vide his order dated 9.12.1991 exercising his powers under clause 15(2)(vi) of the DRTA, 1952 passed the order removing the petitioner from service and simultaneously the corporation filed an application under Section … could justify approval of the Tribunal in exercise of its judicial discretion. 16. In view of my above discussion I am unable to trace any … report on 30.8.1991 holding that the misconduct against the petitioner under Section 9(b) and (m) of the DTRA Rules being passed and consequently show cause notice dated 30.8.1991 was served upon the workman who submitted his reply

Delhi Transport Corporation vs Ranbir Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the said regulations for ‘MISCONDUCT’ in case of breach of standing orders issued under para 15(1) of DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations 1952. They are:-19. General Provisions: Without prejudice to the provisions of the … by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge also overlooked the fact that the Appellant followed the rules under Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952 concerning the disqualification of the employee … of Delay)1. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 162 days in filing the Appeal is hereby condoned. The same is allowed.2.

Ram Phal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulation, 1952 - Regulations 13, 14(10) and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 311

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT452; 2008(105)DRJ18

4 of the Standing Orders governing the Conduct of Employees of DTC and as per Regulation 15 of the DRTA Regulations, 1952, a detailed procedure of charge sheet for obtaining reply from the employees and then holding inquiry … Service) Regulation, 1952 is ultra vires, void and vocative of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has also … opportunity of putting forward his/her case and an order involving civil consequences must be made consistently with the rules of natural justice. It was held that it is not so much to act judiciously but to act