Advanced Search Results

Ravinder Kumar Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

initially on probation for two years. His services were terminated on 02.02.2011 under Clause 9 (a) (I) of the DRTA (conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952. The appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected by an order … took into account his attendance record. The petitioner was found irregular in his duties however, while relying on Rule 9 (a) (I) of the DRTA learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondents were well within their … HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 12468/2015 (condonation of delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … Shri Same Chand Secretary of the plaintiff/applicant and Upon considering the application (IA No. 1365188) under order 39, Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151 Civil Procedure Code , (copy enclosed) and after hearing Shri Same Chand,

Ram Phal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulation, 1952 - Regulations 13, 14(10) and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 311

Reported in : 151(2008)DLT452; 2008(105)DRJ18

4 of the Standing Orders governing the Conduct of Employees of DTC and as per Regulation 15 of the DRTA Regulations, 1952, a detailed procedure of charge sheet for obtaining reply from the employees and then holding inquiry … opportunity of putting forward his/her case and an order involving civil consequences must be made consistently with the rules of natural justice. It was held that it is not so much to act judiciously but to act … seeks quashing of his dismissal order contained in letters dated 20th September, 1985, 20th May, 1986 and 3rd March, 1987 and he seeks a declaration

Rohtash Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, Through Its ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

board for 1st extension in the service of this corporation vide memo No.SVD/GO/PFC (Dr.)/2012/331 dated 07.02.2012. As per DRTA rule No.10. In this connection it is stated that above said driver was thoroughly examined by the DTC medical … ORDER (ORAL) Mr. M.L. Chauhan, Member (J): 1. This is the second round of litigation.  Earlier, the applicant has filed OA-1450/2012 for the same relief.  However,

Rajpal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33C(2); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 21; Delhi Transport Corporation Act

was declared unfit for service and prematurely retired on medical grounds under para III of clause 10 of the DRTA (Conditions of appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 („DRTA Regulations). The industrial dispute raised by the Petitioner was referred … 1. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 3 rd … period of four weeks. It was further directed that pay for the intervening period would be as per Rules. 4. By the impugned order dated 3rd February 1999 DTC offered the Petitioner appointment to the post of

D.T.C. Vs. Po, Labour Court No.1 and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of the workman is illegal or unjustified as no reason disclosed while terminating the services u/Sec. 9(a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952? 2.8. As per terms of reference. Parties were afforded opportunity to … Mohd. Rashid, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Workman has died during the pendency of writ petition and is represented … under the Compensation Act, it was stated that workman was not entitled to the same as per the rules of the Corporation being daily rated employee. It was further stated that workman was on probation and his

Bharat Bhushan Vs Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Road Transport Corporation

Acts : Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 ; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971

about the sickness nor any application/information was ever sent to the respondent and it constitutes misconduct as per the DRTA Rules.13. It is specifically mentioned in para 11 of the written statement that the Enquiry Officer had conducted … sickness nor any application/information was ever sent to the respondent and it constitutes misconduct as per the DRTA Rules.13. It is specifically mentioned in para 11 of the written statement that the Enquiry Officer had conducted the … 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

Shri Radhey Mohan S/O Sh. Kanahya Lal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

for the DTC submitted that those Rules would not be applicable to the applicant as specific provision in the DRTA (Conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952 provided the leave encashment aspects. 18.  There has been reference to … the Tribunal has held that leave lying to the credit as also gratuity has to be paid. 3.   Rule 9(1) of the CCS Leave Rules 1972 reads as under:- “9.  Effect of dismissal, removal of resignation on

Vaishali Singh Koshal Vs. Indian Tourism Development Corporation, Ltd. ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

III AD (Delhi) 712, wherein termination of service by invoking deemed resignation under Clause Rule 14(1) (b) of DRTA Rules and Regulations was held as retrenchment. It was further held that even absenting of respondent from service

Delhi Transports Corporation & Others vs.sunil Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sciences.3. On 19.07.2013, services of Sunil Kumar was terminated with effect from 17.07.2013 under Clause 9 (a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952 (1952 Regulations, for short). The appeal dated 23.07.2013 filed by Sunil … 9885 & 11452 of 2015 Page 4 of 12 reinstate Amrish Kumar on probation as per the applicable rules, on an alternative post in terms of the provisions of Section 47 (1) of the Persons with Disabilities