Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … virus of proviso (1) of Clause 15(c)(.2) of the Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952, framed in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) lead with Clause (c) of subjection 1

D.T.C. Vs. Jag Bhushan Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 22, 23, 26, 33, 33A, 33(1) and 33(2); Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1981 - Sections 3(1) 4 and 12; Essential Services Maintenance (Amendment) Act, 1985; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 15(2); Payment of Wages Act - Sections 9(2)

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT384; [2007(112)FLR57]; (2007)2LLJ322Del

petitions are disposed of in these terms:(a) We uphold the virus of proviso (ii) to Clause 15(2)(c) of the DRTA Regulations, 1952 by reading down the expression 'exceptional cases' to cover cases 'where it is not reasonably practicable … powers under proviso (ii) to Clause 15(2)(c) of the Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 (for short 'the Regulations') on the ground that it was not possible to hold an enquiry. It … outlined under Regulation 15(2)(c). The workmen were dismissed from their services on 24.3.1988. Aggrieved by the said dismissal order, appeals were filed by the workmen

Shri Radhey Mohan S/O Sh. Kanahya Lal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

for the DTC submitted that those Rules would not be applicable to the applicant as specific provision in the DRTA (Conditions of appointment and service) Regulations 1952 provided the leave encashment aspects. 18.  There has been reference to … for gratuity the applicable legal provisions are Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act and the applicable regulations framed by DTC for payment of gratuity being ‘DTC Employees Provident Regulations’.” 5.   We note that in respect … application dated 4.10.2001 and legal notice dated 10.01.2002.  However, vide letter dated 24.12.2001 he was intimated that he was not entitled for the benefit of

D.T.C. Vs. Tara Chand and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Instructions and Standing Order governing conduct of DTC employees and Clause No. 19 (f ) and (m) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952 (in short the DRTA Regulations). After the reply of the workman, … DTC employees and Clause No. 19 (f ) and (m) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952 (in short the DRTA Regulations). After the reply of the workman, the enquiry was conducted and the … the act of rash and negligent driving was in violation of Para 24 of the Executive Instructions and Standing Order governing conduct of DTC employees

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ran Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

deemed to have resigned from service vide order dated 24.03.1987 by invoking the provisions of Clause 14(10)(b) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952. The respondent workman challenged this action of the appellant by raising … order dated 24.03.1987 by invoking the provisions of Clause 14(10)(b) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952. The respondent workman challenged this action of the appellant by raising the industrial dispute which was referred

D.T.C. Vs. Prem Nath and ors. Through Lrs

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sh. Sukhdeva Ram, Driver B. No.14888 Pay token No.47737 are hereby terminated w.e.f. 3.2.1987 under clause 9(a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952. A cheque No.699024 dated 30.1.87 for Rs.2519.00 paise (Rupees Two thousand … issued by placing reliance on clause 9(a)(i) of the Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Services) Regulations, 1952. The respondent claimed that no enquiry was held and the charge sheet which was made the foundation … is required to deposit all the DTC articles in his possession within 24 hrs of the receipt of the memo or of his being relieved

Vinod Kumar vs.m/s Dtc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

record that the respondent workman had remained absent from 14.08.1986 to 24.03.1987 when provisions of Clause 14(10)(b) of the DRTA Regulations were the aforesaid provision, notice was sent to the respondent workman asking him to join the duties … the respondent workman had remained absent from 14.08.1986 to 24.03.1987 when provisions of Clause 14(10)(b) of the DRTA Regulations were the aforesaid provision, notice was sent to the respondent workman asking him to join the duties but

R.N. Katyal and ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45 and 46; Road Transport Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4 and 4E; Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 480, 516, 516(1) and 516(2); unicipal Corporation Act; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 5

Reported in : 2005(85)DRJ465

placed on Regulation 5 of the D.R.T.A. (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as `the DRTA Regulations).9. Sixty seven officers of the DTC, under the banner of the DTC Engineering Association, had filed Civil … promotion of the contesting Respondents. This Petition was disposed of by the following Order:'Petitioners pray that letter dated 24.7.2003 be quashed and the respondent be directed to consider all the eligible candidates including the petitioners for promotion

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Jai Pal Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279, 304A, 337 and 338; ;DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; ;DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Rules - Rules 10(5) and 15; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

order passed by the petitioners dismissing the respondent from service with effect from 18.09.1988 under Clause 15(2)(vii) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service), Regulations, 1952, being contrary to the circulars of the petitioners, was set aside … respondent from service with effect from 18.09.1988 under Clause 15(2)(vii) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service), Regulations, 1952, being contrary to the circulars of the petitioners, was set aside by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal … filed by Regional Manager (West) DTC in terms of the order dated 24.07.2008. The relevant paragraphs of the said affidavit are reproduced hereunder:3. That regard

D.T.C. Vs. Po, Labour Court No.1 and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

of the workman is illegal or unjustified as no reason disclosed while terminating the services u/Sec. 9(a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952? 2.8. As per terms of reference. Parties were afforded opportunity to … alleging therein that his services had been terminated under Clause 2(a)(i) of DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Regulations). This order did not specify any reason whatsoever as … is required to deposit all the D.T.C. articles in his possession within 24 hours of the receipt of this memo. Nondeposit of D.T.C. articles by