Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … not met by March 16, 1988. The notice of the strike was duly served on the D.T.C.(10) By notification dated March 11,1988, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Essential … You are further restrained from holding any demonstrations or shouting language within 200 Mirs. and/or using any abusive language towards the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Secretary, General

R.N. Katyal and ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45 and 46; Road Transport Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4 and 4E; Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 480, 516, 516(1) and 516(2); unicipal Corporation Act; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 5

Reported in : 2005(85)DRJ465

placed on Regulation 5 of the D.R.T.A. (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as `the DRTA Regulations).9. Sixty seven officers of the DTC, under the banner of the DTC Engineering Association, had filed Civil … the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (DMC Act) and by virtue of clause (a) of Section 516(2) appointments, notifications, orders etc in force immediately before the establishment of the MCD were deemed to have been granted under … alleging contempt of the aforesaid Order on account of the order dated 20-02-2003 issued by the respondent Corporation. In terms of the said order the

Delhi Transport Corporation Indraprastha Estate Vs. the Presiding Offi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950; Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 12(5) and 39; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 4(1); Statutory Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 116(2005)DLT673

of a statutory power. In this regard, reference was made to the Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950 (the DRTA Act) and the Delhi Road Transport Authority (Scales of Pay) Regulations, 1950 framed there under (the 1950 Regulations); … conferred by Section 10(1)(d) and 12(5) of the Act read with the Government of India, Ministry of Labour Notification dated 14th April, 1975. The notification dated 14th April, 1975 has not been placed on record by learned … the parties were heard on 2nd, 8th, 28th, 29th and 30th September, 2004 when judgment was reserved. 5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner made two

O.P. Sharma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 47; ;DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 125(2005)DLT742

thereforee approached this Court.5. The DTC in its return as denied liability. It relies upon Regulation 10 of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereafter referred to as '1952 Regulations') stating that it is empowered … that the appropriate Government may, having regard to the type of work carried on in any establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in such notification, exempt any establishment from … penal consequences.6. The writ petition was heard and decided on 10th March, 2000 by a Single Judge of this Court. At that stage, the petitioner

Delhi Transports Corporation & Others vs.sunil Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sciences.3. On 19.07.2013, services of Sunil Kumar was terminated with effect from 17.07.2013 under Clause 9 (a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations 1952 (1952 Regulations, for short). The appeal dated 23.07.2013 filed by Sunil … on the ground of his disability: Provided that the appropriate Government may, having regard in any establishment, by notification and subject to such in such conditions, notification, exempt any establishment the provisions of this section. if any, … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:10. h November, 2016 Date of Decision:16. h March, 2017 W.P.(C) 9513/2015 DELHI TRANSPORTS CORPORATION &

Dtc vs.saroop Singh(through Legal Heir Ajay)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

with a charge-sheet, dated 26th September, 1984, proposing to initiate disciplinary action against him, under Regulation 15(2) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as “Regulations”) read with the Delhi Road Transport … dispute, which was referred to by the Secretary, (Labour), Delhi Administration to the Labour Court for adjudication, vide Notification No.F.24 (1781)/87-Lab./18411-16 dated 22nd May, 1987.10. The Notification set out the following term of reference: W.P.(C) No.6322/2004 and … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t August, 2017 Date of Decision:21. t September, 2017 + W.P (C) No.6322/2004 DTC Through:

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Regulation

Acts : Regulation 9(a)(i)

vide order dated 21st June, 1983 terminated the services of the respondent No.3 under Clause 9 (a)(i) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952.4. The Labour Court in the award has noted that the petitioner … reason there for. He would be considered as having completed the period of probation satisfactorily only when a notification to this affect is issued from this office."The counsel contends that as on 21st June, 1983 the respondent … vide order dated 26th May, 1994 and as clarified on 8th May, 2000 payment at the rate of last drawn wages was directed / ordered.3.

d.t.c vs.chander Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner. This was followed, nearly inevitably, by an order dated 09th April, 1999, under Regulation 15 (2)(vi) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment &Services) Regulations 1952, (hereinafter referred to as „the Regulations”), removing the respondent from service.12. The … and/or unjustified, and if so, to what sum of money as monetary relief along with consequential benefits laws/Govt. notifications and to what other relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?.” terms of … Industrial W.P.(C) No.17326/2004 Page 4 of 25 Tribunal, vide Order No.F.24 (2216)/2001-lab/ 20892-96. The term of reference read thus: “Whether the punishment imposed upon Shri

Saroop Singh vs.dtc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

with a charge-sheet, dated 26th September, 1984, proposing to initiate disciplinary action against him, under Regulation 15(2) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as “Regulations”) read with the Delhi Road Transport … dispute, which was referred to by the Secretary, (Labour), Delhi Administration to the Labour Court for adjudication, vide Notification No.F.24 (1781)/87-Lab./18411-16 dated 22nd May, 1987.10. The Notification set out the following term of reference: W.P.(C) No.6322/2004 and … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t August, 2017 Date of Decision:21. t September, 2017 + W.P (C) No.6322/2004 DTC Through:

Dtc Vs. Hanumant Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

misconduct of unauthorised absence. Consequently, the respondent was removed from service with immediate effect under clause 15(2)(vi) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952 on 06.09.2004.3. The Labour Court, firstly, held the inquiry conducted by … to what sum of money as monetary relief along with other consequential benefits in terms of existing Laws/Govt. Notifications and to what other relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect? 2. The … placed on the judgment of this Court in Mahavir Singh Vs. DTC, 2007 (139) DLT 569.In this case, the workmen impugned the conduct of the