Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Chander and anr. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33

Reported in : [1989(58)FLR731]; ILR1988Delhi467

Regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 45 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950.(4) The Drta Regulations, 1952 deal, inter alia, with conditions of appointment and service, conduct discipline and appeal etc. We are … in Delhi was taken over with effect from April 7, 1958 in accordance with a scheme prepared under Chapter XIV-Transport Services. For the efficient performance of its functions, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi had, inter alia, the … a declaration that the impugned dismissal orders are in violation of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.(2) The Delhi Road Transport Authority Act,

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Dharam Pal (Ex. Driver)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 44, 45, 46, 47 and 279; ;Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4; Delhi Road Transport Laws (Amendment) Act, 1950; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 516(2); Road Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 45; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT555

by Delhi Transport Corporation, the management which reads as under:In accordance with the provisions of Regulation 10 of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment & Service) Regulations, 1952 is framed by the erstwhile DRTA which are still in force … DLT 111. Some observations which are relevant are extracted below:9. Section 47 of the said Act occurs in Chapter VII thereof which deals with non-discrimination. Section 44 deals with non-discrimination in transport whereas Section 45 deals with … a coordinate Bench on the same issue and held: (SCC p.256, para 33) 33. As the learned Single Judge was not in agreement with the

d.t.c vs.chander Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner. This was followed, nearly inevitably, by an order dated 09th April, 1999, under Regulation 15 (2)(vi) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment &Services) Regulations 1952, (hereinafter referred to as „the Regulations”), removing the respondent from service.12. The … for the purposes of employment under the Central Government, as per the list of recognized qualifications contained in Chapter IX of the Hand Book for Personnel Officer (1987 edition).9. The petitioner contends that the above communication, from … above, but which is prima facie detrimental with interest of the organization.” 33. Regulation (15)(2) deals with imposition of penalties for misconduct. The misconduct alleged