Advanced Search Results
Sh. Sanjay Chiripal Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and ors.
Delhi
May-10-2011
Co-operative Societies
Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 - Sections 116, 62, 67, 61(1); Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 - Rule 22
this a merely a technical irregularity which is fully cured by the provisions contained in Section 39 of the DCS Act, 2003. Moreover, there is no such instance in case of the present Managing Committee and as such no cause
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNand Kishor vs the Registrar of Cooperative Society & Anr.
Delhi
Jan-28-2026
Land Acquisition
the future. [...] (iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, the special order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … coordinator. The Ex-Managing Committee had expelled the said persons u/s 86(1)(c) of the DCS Act, 2008 r/w Rule 99 of the DCS Rules 2007 but the same was not approved due to the procedural lapses.14. That the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Gopal Agarwal vs Registrar of Co-Opeartive Societies & Anr.
Delhi
Jan-28-2026
Land Acquisition
cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … coordinator. The Ex-Managing Committee had expelled the said persons u/s 86(1)(c) of the DCS Act, 2008 r/w Rule 99 of the DCS Rules 2007 but the same was not approved due to the procedural lapses.14. That the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Naval Technical Officers Cghs Ltd vs the Registrar of Cooperative ...
Delhi
Jan-28-2026
Land Acquisition
cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … coordinator. The Ex-Managing Committee had expelled the said persons u/s 86(1)(c) of the DCS Act, 2008 r/w Rule 99 of the DCS Rules 2007 but the same was not approved due to the procedural lapses.14. That the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaval Technical Officers Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited vs ...
Delhi
Jan-28-2026
Land Acquisition
cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from … coordinator. The Ex-Managing Committee had expelled the said persons u/s 86(1)(c) of the DCS Act, 2008 r/w Rule 99 of the DCS Rules 2007 but the same was not approved due to the procedural lapses.14. That the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors
Delhi
Mar-12-2026
Land Acquisition
BodyMeeting (‘SGBM’) dated 27th June 2010, expelled the petitioner under Section 86 (1)(a) DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 99 DCS Rules, 2007 for anti-society activities and filing false and frivolous complaints and litigations. Final Show Cause Notice … order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce, Coimbatore Vs. Golden Dew Tea Factory [Alongwith
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-29-2006
Land Acquisition
(2006)(112)ECC157
above Notification. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPepperl + Fuchs (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Sep-30-2005
Land Acquisition
the imports made from 1-4-99 to 19-3-2003. A penalty of Rs. 25,00,000/- under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 was demanded. The goods valued at Rs. 13,00,285/-and Rs. 1,44,51,574/- have been confiscated without giving any option
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Kumar Rawat and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
May-31-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)210CTR(Raj)553; RLW2007(4)Raj3133
such authority. Besides Section 50C being a newly introduced provision, has been made effective prospectively from 1st April, 2003. The learned Counsel for the appellant relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Appropriate Authority and … was agreed between the parties that they shall obtain a certificate in Form No. 37-1 of the IT Act and within one month thereafter the sale deed shall be got executed. According to the prospective buyers however … property in favour of the prospective buyers for a consideration of Rs. 99,84,500. The sale price was calculated at the rate of Rs. 1,051 per
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another
Chennai
Aug-23-2016
Land Acquisition
a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »