Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 97 · Page 1 of about 457 results (0.083 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 28 2026

Madan Gopal Agarwal vs Registrar of Co-Opeartive Societies & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2026

The Naval Technical Officers Cghs Ltd vs the Registrar of Cooperative ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2026

Naval Technical Officers Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited vs ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 29 2016

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

with Rule 5(3) and (4) of the E.P. Rules, the Central Government issued Notification on 22.04.2003 (for short 2003 Notification ) as it was of the opinion that the 1991 Notification should be amended with a view … State of Haryana (1984) 4 SCC 371), and in particular paragraph 5. 97. He further submitted that the submission advanced by the petitioners that order … C.R.Z. 4. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 3(1) and Section 3(2) (v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short 'E.P.Act') and Rule 5(3)(d) of Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 (for short E.P.Rules'), MOEF issued Notification

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2005

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … cope up and for almost a week the entire city was completely crippled.2. The first Petitioner Bombay Environmental Action Group is a public charitable trust duly registered and also a registered society. Its aims and objects are, … 58 means, then whether the amendment to DCR 58 is permissible under Section 37 of the MRTP Act?d) Assuming the amendment to DCR 58 was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2006

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. and ors.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Oct-04-2006

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL405

1956. The Appellant is a generating company within the meaning of Clause (28) of Section 2 of Electricity Act, 2003 and also Clause (4A) of Section 2 and a bulk licensee within the meaning of Sub-section (3) of … crores to be paid by REL to TPC for 1998-99 has been adjusted.100. Thus, as detailed in paras 97 and 99, TPC is liable to refund to REL, as on 31^st March, 2004, the amount detailed below:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … akin to the removal of obstruction as ordered by an Executing Court in terms of Order XXI, Rules 97 and 98 of the Code. Any resistance on the part of the owner or occupier after an order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2010

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Samarendra Nath Mukherjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-30-2010

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 30, 33 and 37(3); ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 16 and 34

was appointed the railway took the plea as would appear from the judgment and order dated November 25, 2003. They could not succeed. They also did not go higher up. On both the occasions, they appeared before … settlement of the final bill. The respondent approached the Court of law under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 inter alia praying for filing of the arbitration agreement in Court and appointment of an arbitrator in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2013

Puttamma and ors. Vs. K.L.Narayana Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the injuries.4. His wife and children preferred the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 1988), claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-. The 2nd respondent (Insurance Company) contested

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2012

United States Vs. Alvarez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-28-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

against the idea that we need Oceania’s Ministry of Truth. See G. Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) (Centennial ed. 2003). Were this law to be sustained, there could be an endless list of subjects the National Government or … the legal system. See United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U. S. 87, 97 (1993) (“To uphold the integrity of our trial system . . . … of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 11-210. Argued February 22, 2012-Decided June 28, 2012 The Stolen Valor Act makes it a crime to falsely claim receipt of military decorations or medals and provides an enhanced penalty … . makes any mate-rially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or repre-sentation.” §1001. Section 1001’s prohibition on false statements made to Government officials, in communications concerning

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial