Advanced Search Results

H.K. Madhia Vs. Financial Commissioner and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

manner. One of the main contention of the petitioner is that RCS had no power u/s 41 of the DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 19 and 25 of the DCS Rules, 2007 to cease his membership. Further, that RCS has … This was, complains the petitioner, totally overlooked by the lower authorities. The proceedings conducted by the Registrar under Section 41 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 read with Rule 19 and 25 of Delhi Cooperative Societies

RaziuddIn Mohd. Siddiqui and anr. Vs. Zaihab Khatoon and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96(2) - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD564; 2004(6)ALT658; 2005(1)CTC179; [2005(2)JCR31(AP)]

of Civil Procedure and, (2) as regards the maintainability of appeal filed against the ex parte decree under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure after dismissal of application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code. … Division Bench was on two counts, namely, (1) as to the applicability of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to an application filed seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal against ex parte decree, when such … : AIR2003SC4172 , Kasar Devi v. Union of India and Ors., : 2003CriLJ3750 and Aswani Kumar Singh v. U.P. Public Service Commission and Ors., AIR

Sayra Devi and ors. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2007ACJ2686

Counsel for the appellants that as per Sub-section (2) of Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Section 96 (2) of the Act, 1939], the insurance company is entitled to defend the action on the grounds enumerated

Commnr. of Customs (imports), Mumbai Vs. Tullow India Operations Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 14, 18, 25(1), 111, 112 and 151A; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3(1); Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 - Rules 4 and 9

Reported in : AIR2006SC536; 2005(103)ECC209; 2005(189)ELT401(SC); JT2005(10)SC618; 2005(9)SCALE58; (2005)13SCC789

made on 6th September, 1999. The appeal there against before the Tribunal came to be dismissed in December, 2003. Essentiality certificate, however, was granted in favour of ONGC on 23.6.2004.Tullow had also applied for grant of essentiality … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of notification issued in terms of sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 being General Exemption No. 121 is in question in these appeals which arise out of judgment and

First Global Stockbroking (P) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Mum.)173

the assessee and on analysis of the seized material learned AO framed the assessment order on 13th June, 2003 and determined the undisclosed income of the assessee for the block period as under: 18 Subject to the … directors in Buffalo Networks (P) Ltd. having shareholding of 26 per cent (approx.) in the company.Search and seizure action under Section 132--A search operation under Section 132(1) of the IT Act was conducted at various offices and … the books. He worked out the difference of sale price at Rs. 96,27,80,000 and made the addition. The AO has discussed this issue at pp.

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board and ors. Vs. Nolambur Residents Welfare

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Housing Board [TNHB] Act - Sections 138, 110(1)(2) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80(2), 80(1); Registration of Societies Act - Section 20; Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Section 25(d); Specific Relief Act - Section 34; Land Acquisition Act - Section 72; Limitation Act - Section 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

has filed written statement stating that Plaintiff had not issued the mandatory notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act and non-issuance of notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act is fatal for the institution of the suit.

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

14) Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited V. Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. (Appeal No. 96 of 2008) 15) Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. V. Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. (Appeal No. 129 … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the PPA however, was not adopted by the State Commission in terms of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. But, the PPA was forwarded by the Appellant to the State Commission along with a covering letter on … to the Appellant from 14.5.2005 to 14.7.2005. (o) Accordingly, the Appellant had paid a sum of Rs.7, 17, 96,254 to the Respondent Company towards fixed charges for the power supplied from 14.5.2005 to 14.7.2005. (p) The Accountant

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … is not required. In paragraph 3 of the judgment (at page 542) (of Ker LT) : (at p. 96 of AIR), their Lordships have held thus :-- ".......The subject has been discussed elaborately by a Full Bench

Shelby County Vs. Holder

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

See Order in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Texas, No. 06-cv-1046 (WD Tex.), Doc. 8. In 2003, after African-Americans won a majority of the seats on the school board for the first time in history, … for the district of columbia circuit No. 12-96. Argued February 27, 2013-Decided June 25, 2013 The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to address entrenched racial discrimination in voting, “an insidious and pervasive evil which had … of the Constitution.” South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U. S. 301 . Section 2 of the Act, which bans any “standard, practice, or procedure” that