Advanced Search Results

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of … was allottee ofFlat no. 257, Ground Floor, Category-II, SFS, Pocket-2, Sector-19, Dwarka, New Delhi of plinth area of 92 sq. mtrs. approximately, allotted by the Delhi Development Authority (‘DDA’) on 18th June 1996. It was alleged that

J. Jayalalitha and Others Vs. State, By the Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

the Appellant/Accused No.1 for the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention … Sasi Enterprises vehicles also. For each, he used to send separate bills for Sasi Enterprises vehicle Registration Nos. 9207, 9027, 3585, 6565, 9090, 7299, 3559, 3744, 1344, 2466, 7200, 345, 3496, 9690. He gave petrol, diesel and

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in … Instructions issued. Ref: (i) G.O.Ms.No.1027, Revenue Department, dated 25.9.92. (ii) Government Lt.No.86973/C.Spl.1/ 92-1, Revenue Department, dated 4.11.92. (iii)From the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … cope up and for almost a week the entire city was completely crippled.2. The first Petitioner Bombay Environmental Action Group is a public charitable trust duly registered and also a registered society. Its aims and objects are, … 58 means, then whether the amendment to DCR 58 is permissible under Section 37 of the MRTP Act?d) Assuming the amendment to DCR 58 was

C.Padmavathi Vs. K.T.Anbalagan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

2003 for a declaration and also for framing a Scheme to administer the Trust and render accounts under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code.3. As the Administrator appointed by this Court resigned, by a subsequent order dated … learned Administrator himself should sign the cheques or he should permit the defendants side to do the said act along with the plaintiffs side. The very same sentiment has been echoed by the learned counsels appearing for

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … Policy in the English Common Law’ (1928) 42(1) Harvard Law Review 76, 92; Stephen Waddams, Principle and Policy in Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011); … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time

Dr.Mrs.Rajam Sethuraman Vs. Maha Semam Trust

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

some of the defendants were residing outside the jurisdiction of this Court and (ii) A.No.123 of 2012 under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for leave to institute a suit for the framing of a Scheme … Managing Director, (Formerly Semam Micro Finance Investment, Literacy and Empowerment Ltd., a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and having its Registered Office at No.4, Dr.Natesan Road, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083 Represented by its Chairman

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … % MAY(WEF 08.05.09) June July CUM. YEARLY (%) 1. Gandhisagar 59.86 25.46 38.82 40.05 2. Pench 29.17 56.75 92.46 61.99 3. Bargi 69.16 43.30 38.32 48.78 4 Bansagar-1 96.46 66.03 80.92 80.05 5 Banasagar-II 44.75 43.43 47.42

Madras Medical Care and Health Vs. Devaki Hospital Limited and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

be in-charge of affairs of the Company do not survive. The High Court in C.S. No. 562 of 2003 prima facie found that the second respondent violated Section 295 of the Act-and consequently restrained her from (a) … by any such person or by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped. In view of Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, unregistered lease deed cannot be looked into for the purpose of contradicting, varying,

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board and ors. Vs. Nolambur Residents Welfare

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Housing Board [TNHB] Act - Sections 138, 110(1)(2) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80(2), 80(1); Registration of Societies Act - Section 20; Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Section 25(d); Specific Relief Act - Section 34; Land Acquisition Act - Section 72; Limitation Act - Section 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

has filed written statement stating that Plaintiff had not issued the mandatory notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act and non-issuance of notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act is fatal for the institution of the suit.