Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 91 · Page 1 of about 360 results (0.062 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 2008

M/S. Rahimfrooz Batteries Limited Vs. Mr. Debraj Dey and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Jul-04-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Circuit Bench at Kolkata) Honble Shri Z. S. Negi,Chairman: The above Diary No. 600/2007/TM/IPAB is an appeal under section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) filed by Shri Obaidur Haque on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Archit Shukla & Ors vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies, Govt. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted … have paid the membership fee and the equalization charges. Another 34 GPA holders were enrolled as members under Section 91 of DCS Act.6. For conducting the elections in the year 2011, Sh. M.P. Singh was appointed as an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Shri Khiya Ram Khilwani & Anr vs.registrar of Cooperative Societie ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted … have paid the membership fee and the equalization charges. Another 34 GPA holders were enrolled as members under Section 91 of DCS Act.6. For conducting the elections in the year 2011, Sh. M.P. Singh was appointed as an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 17 2005

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … cope up and for almost a week the entire city was completely crippled.2. The first Petitioner Bombay Environmental Action Group is a public charitable trust duly registered and also a registered society. Its aims and objects are, … 58 means, then whether the amendment to DCR 58 is permissible under Section 37 of the MRTP Act?d) Assuming the amendment to DCR 58 was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … 9 SCC 620; Sarwan Kumar v. Madan Lal Aggarwal [2003] 1 SCR 918 : (2003) 4 SCC 147; Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S A … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2011

Jamshed Kanga and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-10-2011

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 47, 37; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 19(1)(d), 48A

respondent 7 WIFA commencing from the date of handing over of the possession and ending on 31 December 2003 on a rent calculated at the rate of Rs.1/- per sq. yard per month for the built up … then Chief Minister Mr. Sushilkumar Shinde allowing an appeal under section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short "the MRTP Act") and thereby granting permission to the respondent 7, the Western India Football … unrelated to sports. The petitioners have also challenged the vires of section 91AA(2) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 which in the year 1996

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2011

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board and ors. Vs. Nolambur Residents Welfare

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-10-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Housing Board [TNHB] Act - Sections 138, 110(1)(2) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80(2), 80(1); Registration of Societies Act - Section 20; Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Section 25(d); Specific Relief Act - Section 34; Land Acquisition Act - Section 72; Limitation Act - Section 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

has filed written statement stating that Plaintiff had not issued the mandatory notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act and non-issuance of notice under Section 138 of TNHB Act is fatal for the institution of the suit.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2014

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … open to anybody to contend that high tension towers cannot be put up.29. A decision of Sethuraman,J., in 91 L.W.558 was also brought to my notice wherein the learned Judge has held that the Electricity Board can

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2005

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. Siemens Public Communication Networ ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 20, 31, 31(2), 32, 34, 34(2), 34(2)(9), 52(5) and 54

Reported in : 2005(1)ARBLR369(Delhi); 118(2005)DLT293; 2005(80)DRJ584

R.C. Jain, J.1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ( in short the 'Act) praying for setting aside the Award dated 28.11.2002. In fact, what is … Court with a view to decide the matter finally considers it desirable to refer other grounds as well. 91,99,600/- with interest of 18% from 28.6.1995 towards the price of DDF is not only contrary to the well-established

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial