Advanced Search Results

Amar Jeet & Ors. vs Registrar Cooperative Societies & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

revised the maintenance charges without approval of the General body in contravention of Section 89 and 93 of the DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 102(2) & (3) of the DCS Rules, 2007. Further, the inclusion of non-primary members in the

Bharath Gold Mines Ltd. by Its Managing Director Vs. the Industrial Cr ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies Act - Sections 6, 15(1), 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3) and 20(4); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25(O); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394 and 529A; Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale Industries and Ancillary Unit Act, 1993; Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Constitution of India

Reported in : 2009(6)AIRKarR477

any metal/ore/gold points; and for at least in any one project continuously b) Bidder has since April 01, 2003 been carrying out gold ore exploration, mine development and gold ore mining for a period of at least … AIR 1990 SC 325, (3) : (2006)7 SCC 470, (4) : (1997) 89 Comp Case 609 (SC) & (5) Manu/GJ/0006/ 1999. He also submits that … than the accumulated loss and thus became a sick industrial company within the meaning of Sick Industrial Companies Act ('SICA', for the sake of brevity).4. The Board of Directors of the Company passed a resolution on 13.2.1992 … making a reference to BIFR and accordingly a case was registered under Section 15(1) of the SICA in case No. 505/1992 before the BIFR. By

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … K Saksena v. International Commission on Irrigation & Drainage [2014] 14 SCR 892 : (2015) 4 SCC 670; 2182 [2024] 11 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports

Kerala Roadways (P) Ltd., vs the Dy. Commissioner of Income

Court : Chennai

show that advance tax was paid in respect of the total income declared at Rs.1,68,90,172/- for the A.Y.2002- 2003 after taking in to account the TDS deducted. The appellant’s case is directly covered by the Hon’ble High … (3), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Respondent Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in I.T.(SS)A.No.87/MDS/2007 for the

Hind Metals and Industries Pvt. Vs. Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Pvt.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL77

the dispute in the name of facilitation and promotion as is warranted under Section 30 of the Electricity Act 2003. 5) The Commission's finding that the respondent No. 1 could use the feeder exclusively is opposed to the … been preferred by Hind Metals & Industries Pvt. Ltd., herein referred to as 'Hind Metals'. The appeal No. 89 of 2007 has been preferred by Nav Bharat Ventures Ltd. which had been earlier known as Nav Bharat

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

a place and everything is in its place." (xi) In Balram Kumawat v. Union of India reported in 2003 (7) SCC 628, the Supreme Court held that, Contextual reading is a well-known proposition of interpretation of statute. … Chaudhary v. Director General, Doordarshan and others reported in 1989 1 SCC 89, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that exercise of discretion should be legitimate, … (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, against the Final Order No.455 of 2007, dated 20.04.2007, on the file of Customs, Excise and Service

Anup Mittal (Huf) Vs. M/s. Kanungo Co-Operative Group Housing Society ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to estimate the expense in the budget and approve in the General Body Meeting. Under Rule 89(7) of the DCS Rules, 2007, cost of maintenance, repair and replenishment in the common areas and facilities alone could be only … the Award dated 4th March, 2014 passed by the Arbitrator under Section 71 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 (the Acthereafter) whereby the claim of the petitioner herein had been upheld. 3. There is no dispute so

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. K.Poomani

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of any order issued by the Government under Section 9 of the Tamil Nadu Groundwater (Development and Management) Act 2003, neither the Revenue Authorities nor the Police Authorities got any power to obstruct the petitioner from drawing ground … the semi critical and safe blocks are notified as 'B' category  stage of groundwater extraction is below 89%. The Government further notified in paragraph Nos.9 to 12 as follows: ".9. The Government further direct that no

M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sales of knee joint CMPs in terms of quantity was 57 in 2001-02, 81 in 2002-03, 91 in 2003-04, 89 in 2004-05 and 60 in 2005-06; (l) that the sales of knee joint CMP in terms of … with Order IV, Rule of the Original Side Rules, Section 108 read with Section 50(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 and Section 22(2)(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. ----- For Plaintiff : Mr.M.Sundar For Defendant-1 : Mr.V.Chandrakanthan