Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 88 · Page 1 of about 395 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2014

Bihar Industries Association Sinha Library Road Vs. Bihar Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Mar-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Surendra Kumar, Judicial Member. 1. This is an Appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 filed by the appellant Bihar Industries Association against the order dated 15.03.2013 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2026

Sanjay Kumar Nandecha vs M/S. Aithent Technologies Pvt. Ltd..

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-16-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

month, 30% of his gross salary amounting to Rs.26,550/- per month, was deferred from April, 2002 till March, 2003. The deferred component aggregating to Rs.3,18,600/-, was agreed to be paid on 01.04.2003. RFA 649/2024 Page 2 of … to the terms of Ex. PW-1/D1, would be hit by Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Appellant/Plaintiff had failed to establish any contractual arrangement whereby the reduced component of salary was to … E N TNEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.1. The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with OrderXLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter … 09.07.2002 Ex. PW-2/1 uses the terminology "deferred", and stands recognised under Section 88-A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The decision in Dale & Carrington

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … Butler 825 So.2d 779,783-85 (Ala. 2002); Philipp Bros. v. Icco 1990 Rev. 880,883; Raffineries de Petrole d’Homs et de Banias v. Chambre de Commerce Internationale

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 16 2026

Sanjay Verma vs M/S. Aithent Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-16-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

sum of Rs.48,450/- per month was reduced from his salary for the period from April 2002 to March 2003. He was entitled to a total of Rs.5,81,400/-, as arrears of deducted salary. In addition, the Appellant/Plaintiff claimed … and 06.10.2004 Mark PW-1/B upon had not been proved in accordance with section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. moreover, the claim was, in any event, barred by limitation since it pertained to the year 2001, while … the e-mails relied upon by theAppellant/Plaintiff are admissible in terms of Section 88-A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. It is also submitted that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Madras Medical Care and Health Vs. Devaki Hospital Limited and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

be in-charge of affairs of the Company do not survive. The High Court in C.S. No. 562 of 2003 prima facie found that the second respondent violated Section 295 of the Act-and consequently restrained her from (a) … of the issued share capital of M/s Devaki Hospital Limited ("the Company") aggrieved on account of certain alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement, at the instance of the second respondent, in the affairs of the Company, namely,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2007

income Tax Officer Vs. Bal Bharti Public School

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-13-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)111TTJ(Delhi)222

of Rs. 12,000 in respect of such child. This proviso was inserted in the Act by the Finance Act, 2003, w.e.f. 1st April, 2004. Thus, this proviso is applicable to asst. yr. 2004-05 and onwards. In other words, … & 2004-05 5. The learned Counsel referred to the provisions contained in third proviso below Sub-section (5) of Section 88, which provides that where the aggregate of any sum specified in Clause (xivb) of Sub-section (2) exceeded an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2007

Sri Satyapal Wassan L/H Sri Naresh Vs. the A.C.i.T.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur

Decided on : Feb-27-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

No. 1 as general in nature ignoring assessee's claim regarding excess value of gold surrendered and claim Under Section 88. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case , the ld. CIT (A)-II was … also submitted that the addition can be made under Section 68 or under Section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.6. Againsi this the Ld. A.R. of the assessee submitted that the AO had not recorded any statement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2005

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. CochIn Malabar Estates and

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Decided on : Apr-26-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Coch.)434

the income liable to tax. The Hon'ble High Court has referred to the CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2003, dt. 22nd May, 2003 [(2003) 182 CTR (St) 1] which is relating to Rules 7A and 7B of … income for the asst. yrs.1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94 under Section 139 of the IT Act on different dates. The assessments of the assessee were completed initially under Section 143(3), but subsequently proceedings were

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2015

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vishishth Chay Vyapar Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These appeals, preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’), impugn a common order dated 30.06.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2015

Manohar Lal and Anr. Vs. The Registrar, Co-Op. Group Housing Society a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

membership in such cooperative group housing societies which have already held self draw of lot in violation of DCS Act and Rules. (ii) To suggest procedure for verification of membership in such cooperative group housing societies, original records … Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi in exercise of powers under Section 127 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 giving a one time exemption with regard to the self draw conducted by the 26 societies including the … of the provisions of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act to a particular society. It is pointed out that Section 88 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972 was in pari materia to Section 12 of the Delhi Cooperative

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial