Advanced Search Results
Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors
Delhi
Mar-12-2026
Land Acquisition
order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeccaa Prime Tannery Vs. Chairman of Tamilnadu Electricity Board
Chennai
Feb-20-2013
Land Acquisition
Regulatory Commission made Tamilnadu Electricity Distribution Code by exercising powers under Section 86 and 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 22(1) and 29 of the Electricity Act 2003 enable the State Regulatory Commission to fix the tariff rates.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Daganiya, Raipur Vs. Ara ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Feb-24-2011
MRTP
filed a petition in Petition No.2/2009 before the State Commission under Section 86(1)(f) and 86(1)(k) of the Electricity Act, 2003 with two prayers, i.e., (i) for the direction to the licensee, i.e. Electricity Board, to permit reduction of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sumer Chand Gupta & Ors vs.c B I
Delhi
Feb-26-2019
Right to Information
the purpose of approval. Section 40 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (hereinafter to be referred as “The DCS Act”) prescribes the manner as to how any member of a co-operative society can be expelled. Section 86 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.Selvi Vs. Tangedco Assistant Engineer
Chennai
Sep-25-2013
Land Acquisition
may extend to one thousand rupees for each day of default".18. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 86 and 46 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Tamilnadu Electricity Regulatory Commission has framed the Tamilnadu Electricity Distribution … not provided any alternate way.3. The petitioner has further submitted that as per Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, he is entitled to seek for electricity service connection, to his residential house. As electricity, is an indispensable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmmar Mgf Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Comm ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Sep-08-2009
Land Acquisition
contending that the appellant is not a person aggrieved within the meaning of Section 111 of the Electricity Act 2003, hereinafter referred to as the Act. 7) The respondent No.2 also contests the appeal assailing the locus standi … letter dated 08.02.08 can be treated to be a statutory advice to the Go NCTD stipulated under section 86(2) of the Act nor can the letter dated 03.03.08 can be seen as an order issued by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
May-28-2014
Education
The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s Jindal Steel And Power Ltd. Vs. Chattisgarh State Elect. Reg. Comm ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-29-2022
Land Acquisition
the context of subordinate legislation. From a conjoint reading of Section 2(3), Section 14 and sixth proviso thereof, Section 86 and Section 176(2)(b) of the 2003 Act, it is clear that the Central Government has not been vested … Ors. Etc. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA , J.1. These Civil Appeals filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 arise out of common impugned Judgment dated 07.05.2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New 1 Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Jul-10-2013
Electricity
the PPA however, was not adopted by the State Commission in terms of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. But, the PPA was forwarded by the Appellant to the State Commission along with a covering letter on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Oct-04-2012
Electricity
Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … with the National Electricity Policy and Tariff Policy. e. The term “shall be guided” in Section 61(2) and Section 86(4) of the 2003 Act requires the Commission to follow the Tariff Policy as a mandate as held in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »