Advanced Search Results

Regional Director, E.S.i.C. Vs. Fatesinh Mohansinh Rathod and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4), 2(9), 2(14), 46, 82, 82(2) and 97; Employee State Insurance General-Regulation Act, 1950; Employees' State Insurance General Regulations, 1950 - Regulations 4 and 5

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR487]

on 9.1.2003. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said judgment, the Corporation, has filed appeal somewhere on March, 2003.27. It may be noted that during the pendency of appeal, the Corporation has prayed for the stay of … K.M. Mehta, J.1. Regional Director, Employees' Stale Insurance Corporation, Ahmedabad, appellant-original opponent has filed this appeal under Section 82(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (herein above referred to as 'Act') against the judgment and award

Kerala Roadways (P) Ltd., vs the Dy. Commissioner of Income

Court : Chennai

show that advance tax was paid in respect of the total income declared at Rs.1,68,90,172/- for the A.Y.2002- 2003 after taking in to account the TDS deducted. The appellant’s case is directly covered by the Hon’ble High … (3), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Respondent Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in I.T.(SS)A.No.87/MDS/2007 for the

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … P.2d 1000, 1004; Harold Allen’s Mobile Home Factory Outlet Inc v. Butler 825 So.2d 779, 783; Graham v. Scissor Tail Inc 28 Cal 3d 807;

icici Venture Funds Management Vs. Sofil Information Systems

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)6CompLJ134

the respondents 2 to 4, have transferred their entire shareholding in the Company dehors the petitioner, in June, 2003 in favour of the seventh respondent, upon which its name has been entered in the register of members … 1. This company petition is filed under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") seeking directions against M/s SOFIL Information Systems Private Limited ("the Company") to rectify its register

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pandey Construction Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 3, 7, 7A, 7B, 7B(2A), 9, 10, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 22, 23, 24(1), 24(2), 42, 65, 84C and 211; Rent Control Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81, 82, 86, 86(1) and 117; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28 and 28(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 13(6); Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35); Rajasthan Premises Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1950 - Sections 13(4); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Ciminal Procedure Code - Sections 340, 342, 344, 345, 34

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT206; 2005(2)MPLJ550

Matched in: Advocate M.L. Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jaiswal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1330/2003 and 151/2004 and ;Mohd. Nasir, Adv. in C K.C. Ghildiyal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1119 and 1330/2003 and ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 151/2004

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

N. Mallakanti and ors. Vs. Chennakesava Swamy Temple and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowmwnts Act, 1987 - Sections 82(1), 82(2), 84 and 85; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 - Rules 3 and 5(1)

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD148

order shall dispose of both the writ petitions. There are five writ petitioners in W.P. No. 19169 of 2003 and there is one writ petitioner in W.P.No. 19920 of 2003, The petitioners claim to be cultivating tenants … allegedly in their possession without considering their claims for the purchase of the land under Sub-section (2) of Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (hereafter called the Act for

Adabala Raju and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 82, 82(2) and 82(3); Tenancy Act; Constitution of India - Article 14; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rule, 2003 - Rules 3(2), 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 16(3), 17, 18 and 19

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD145

natural justice, contrary to the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rule 2003 and also violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Article 14 of the Constitution of … of them are small and marginal farmers, if necessary by enhancing the rent as per the provisions of Section 82(2) Proviso (i) of the Act and the said representation is pending before the 3rd respondent who is the

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line

Sidh Nath Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 84, 85, 86, 86A, 86E, 98, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 116, 118, 381, 385 and 386; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004(3)JCR439(Jhr)]

Act, 1922' for short) has not been decided by the authorities as per law.W.P. (C) No. 4493 of 2003This petitioner has challenged the demand notice dated 16th January, 2003, whereby, he has been asked to pay the … look at the relevant provisions of the Act, 1922.Chapter IV deals with municipal taxation i.e. imposition of tax Section 82 deals with the power of the Municipality to impose tax, including holding tax, latrine tax, water tax, education