Advanced Search Results

Syed Gouse Alias Nawab Pasha Kazi vs Karnataka State Board of Wakfs

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

submitted, Hon'ble Supreme Court in case ofKarnataka Waqf Board v. State of Karnataka and Others reported in AIR 2003 SC 2467 had held unless procedure contemplated under Sections 4 and 5 of WAQF Act was followed i.e. … date of publication of Gazette. And since Gazette was published on 27.01.1977, which in view of presumption under Section 81 of Indian Evidence Act was final under Sections 6 and 7 of Act, suit was to be filed

National Highway Authority of India vs Devassy C.M.

Court : Kerala

any individual."(viii) In Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. v. Ajay Kumar [AIR 2003 SC 1843 : (2003) 4 SCC 579], at paragraphs No. 13 to … the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of Section 75 or Section 81; or(ii) it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or(iii) it is in conflict with … RESPONDENTS:1 DEVASSY C.M., AGED 46 YEARS S/O.LATE MATHEW, CHAMAVALAPPIL HOUSE, POTTA, POTTA P.O.,THRISSUR. 2 THE ARBITRATOR (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT 1956) AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR - 680 001. 3 THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR SLAO AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in

Andrew Yule and Company Limited Vs. Descon Limited and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 77A, 77B, 81(1A) and 209A; ;Contract Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Section 15(1)

Reported in : [2009]147CompCas434(Cal)

grievance or complaint forming the basis of the present interlocutory motion has direct link to the cause of action of the suit.The claim of the petitioner in the suit, however, is in respect of its entitlement to … with introduction of Article 53A was disposed of by this Court by the order passed on July 16, 2003.So far as the present interlocutory motion is concerned, this has been triggered by the proposal for issuing fresh … extraordinary general meeting held on June 9, 2006. Under the provisions of Section 81(1A) of the Companies Act, 1956 the shareholders' mandate expressed through a

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … SCC 651; Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation [1990] 1 SCR 818 : (1990) 3 SCC 752; Air India Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport

Tennessee Vs. Lane

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tennessee v. Lane - 02-1667 (2004) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2003 TENNESSEE V. LANE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TENNESSEE v. LANE et al. certiorari to the united … appeals for the sixth circuit No. 02-1667. Argued January 13, 2004-Decided May 17, 2004 Respondent paraplegics filed this action for damages and equitable relief, alleging that Tennessee and a number of its counties had denied them physical … the test for distinguishing between permissible remedial legislation and unconstitutional substantive redefinition: Section 5 legislation is valid if it exhibits “a congruence and proportionality” between … those that rely on due process principles. 276 F. 3d , at 811-816. The minority concluded that Congress had not validly abrogated the States’ Eleventh

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pandey Construction Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 3, 7, 7A, 7B, 7B(2A), 9, 10, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 22, 23, 24(1), 24(2), 42, 65, 84C and 211; Rent Control Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81, 82, 86, 86(1) and 117; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28 and 28(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 13(6); Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35); Rajasthan Premises Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1950 - Sections 13(4); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Ciminal Procedure Code - Sections 340, 342, 344, 345, 34

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT206; 2005(2)MPLJ550

Matched in: Advocate M.L. Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jaiswal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1330/2003 and 151/2004 and ;Mohd. Nasir, Adv. in C K.C. Ghildiyal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1119 and 1330/2003 and ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 151/2004

Mr. Roshan Rai vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

the learned Single Judge it is appropriate to advert to - 40 -Sections 70 and 73 of the Act, 2003. Section 70 provides for constitution of Central Electricity Authority which is respondent No.42 herein. Section 73 which defines functions … - 52 -Najmuddin and Another[4] in the context of the procedure for filing of the election petitions under Section 81 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951. It washeld that the ministerial or administrativefunctions of the authority on

Dr. Ashok P. Arbat Vs. Ketki Research Institute of

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)2CompLJ508

shares, Counsel for the petitioner contended that it is argued by the respondents that a special resolution Under Section 81(1A) of the Act was passed in EOGM on 4.5.2002 and therefore, the directors could have allotted the shares

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd. Vs. M/S Enercon Wind Farms ( ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

PPA is a regulated contract which has been approved by the Regulatory Commission through a regulatory process under Section 81 (i)(d) of the Electricity Act 2003. Hence, this can not be changed by a third party on the … the Appellant only on 10.6.05 as KPTCL was prohibited from trading electricity under the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003. Even thereafter, the bills were paid regularly by the Appellant accepting that 14.5.2003 was the date of commercial