Advanced Search Results
Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented ...
Chennai
Sep-14-2012
Land Acquisition
the CERC, in exercise of the powers conferred, under Section 178, read with Section 79(1)(C) of the Electricity Act, 2003, had issued the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and Related Matters) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012, hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPtc India Ltd. Vs Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation .
Delhi
Aug-13-2010
Land Acquisition
Rs. 7,080.38 crores. The respondent also sought final capital cost and/or tariff for the project in view of Section 79 (i) (b) r/w Section 185 of the Act.11 The prayers made by the respondent in the said petition … Pradesh to be developed by the respondent. The respondent is a generating company as defined in the Electricity Act, 2003.4. The appellant company has been granted license to trade in electricity by Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Dec-06-2006
Electricity
(2006)LCAPTEL851
the NLC is owned by the Government of India, in accordance with the Section 79(1)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Tariff of electricity generated by the Thermal Power Stations of the NLC is to be determined by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited., Hyderabad and Others Vs. Karnataka Electric ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Oct-07-2013
MRTP
the procurement in question comes within the ambit of Section 79 (1) (b) and (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and so, the Central Commission alone has got the jurisdiction. (b) The Second Issue is as to whether
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssam State Electricity Board Vs. Power Grid Corporation of India
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC
Apr-07-2006
Land Acquisition
may advise the Government of India under clause (i) of Sub-section (2) of Section 79 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for immediate implementation of Uniform National Transmission Tariff with the aim to levelise the transmission tariff through out
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ministry of Power, Government of
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC
May-09-2006
MRTP
that the petition has been filed under Clause (ii) of Sub-section (2) of Section 79 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (the Act, for short). Section 79 of the Act describes the functions of the Central Commission. Sub-section (2)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Diwakar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi
Apr-23-2018
Land Acquisition
good faith and had taken necessary steps in precaution and contended that in terms of Rule 105 of DCS Act, he was duty bound to revoke the winding up of all proceedings.8. The appellant who is in custody … Page 1 of 20 judgment dated 22.12.2017 was convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 419/468/471 as well as 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 r/w Section 120 B of the Indian
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...
Karnataka
Feb-25-2011
Service Tax
agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale;” 76. In Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Section 2(15) defines the term “Goods” as under:- “Goods” means all kinds of movable property (other than newspaper, actionable … pleaded by appellants/petitioners in each of these cases are set out in brief. FACTUAL MATRIX W.A.Nos.654/2011, 817-828/2011, 789/2011, 790/2011, 805-816/2011, 792-803/2011, 791/2011 and 829-840/2011. 3. The appellant in all these appeals - M/s. Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Oct-04-2012
Electricity
Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … (h) specify State Grid Code consistent with the Grid Code specified under clause (h) of sub-section (1) of section 79; (i) specify or enforce standards with respect to quality, continuity and reliability of service by licensees; (j) fix
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Oct-04-2012
Electricity
Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … (h) specify State Grid Code consistent with the Grid Code specified under clause (h) of sub-section (1) of section 79; (i) specify or enforce standards with respect to quality, continuity and reliability of service by licensees; (j) fix
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »