Advanced Search Results

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … between the Union and the Bank. 4. The case of the Union in their main Application filed under Section 78 of BIR Act is as follows: The Bank is an undertaking within the meaning of BIR Act and

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale;” 76. In Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Section 2(15) defines the term “Goods” as under:- “Goods” means all kinds of movable property (other than newspaper, actionable … facts pleaded by appellants/petitioners in each of these cases are set out in brief. FACTUAL MATRIX W.A.Nos.654/2011, 817-828/2011, 789/2011, 790/2011, 805-816/2011, 792-803/2011, 791/2011 and 829-840/2011. 3. The appellant in all these appeals - M/s. Bharath Sanchar Nigam

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ... Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(9A), 2(12), 22, 22A, 29, 31, 31(5), 33, 37, 37(1), 37(1A), 37(1AA), 37(2), 38, 50, 58(1), 125, 126, 126(1), 127, 128 and 149; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 3; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 7; Bombay Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1955; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Article 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 31, 47, 48A, 51A, 141, 142, 226 and 368; Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904-1952;Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 1, 52, 52(4), 53(1), 56, 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2), 58(3), 58(4), 58(5), 58(6), 58(7), 58(8), 59(9) and 62(3); Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearan

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

as amended in 2001.b) Assuming that the Petitioners interpretation is accepted, then whether the clarification dated 28th March, 2003 effects an amendment to amended DCR 58, which is not permissible under DCR 62(3)?c) Assuming the Respondents interpretation … cope up and for almost a week the entire city was completely crippled.2. The first Petitioner Bombay Environmental Action Group is a public charitable trust duly registered and also a registered society. Its aims and objects are, … 58 means, then whether the amendment to DCR 58 is permissible under Section 37 of the MRTP Act?d) Assuming the amendment to DCR 58 was … Village of Belle Terre v. Bruce Boraas (974) 39 Law Ed 2d 787 : 416 US 1:'... The police power is not confined to elimination

K.Rajendran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

receipt of rent would not help the Appellant. Referring to number of decisions reported in 1975 (Ii) M.L.J204 2003 (3) C.T.C.488, 1996 (6) S.C.C.399, In The Decision Reported In Lease And Company And Others Vs.M.S.A.Mohammed Farook (2005 … wife to the temple authorities. 5.Inspite of several notices all of a sudden a notice in R.C.No.3779/2004/A3 under Section 78(2) of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 was issued to the Petitioner's wife name by the

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … SCC 520; Denel (Proprietary) Ltd. v. Bharat Electronics Ltd. [2010] 6 SCR 784 : (2010) 6 SCC 394; Bipromasz Birpron Trading Sa v. Bharat Electronics

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

examine validity of a regulation and the Hon’ble Court had said it can be examined by Judicial Review 78 under Article 226 of the Constitution. Mr. Ramachandran does not dispute this proposition of law and does not … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Abdul Malek Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

the business of distributorship under the provisions of the West Bengal Public Distribution System, (Maintenance and Control) Order 2003. The petitioner, along with one Monohar Chandra Halder initially had been appointed as a modified ration (M.R.) distributor … of Supply directorate General of Supplies and Disposals (Vigilence dept.) reported in 78 CWN page 841. iv) K. R. Deb Vs. The Collector of Central … Distribution System (Maintenance and Control) Order was promulgated under the provisions of Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955. By this Control Order, distributorship of this nature was brought within its ambit, specifying the manner of

Madras Medical Care and Health Vs. Devaki Hospital Limited and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

be in-charge of affairs of the Company do not survive. The High Court in C.S. No. 562 of 2003 prima facie found that the second respondent violated Section 295 of the Act-and consequently restrained her from (a) … of the issued share capital of M/s Devaki Hospital Limited ("the Company") aggrieved on account of certain alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement, at the instance of the second respondent, in the affairs of the Company, namely,

Preeti Daga and Others Vs. Cc, New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

he used to attend work of Sri Anil Goyel for customs clearance of consignments from 1999 till July 2003. But he could not say when and why name of M/s Maya Trading was changed to M/s Aman … table below. Both sets of appeals are dealt by this common order in view of similar cause of action and common investigation resulting in similar consequences. Both sides could not inform whether other persons/concerns against whom adjudication … and Shri Ram Kishan Tiwari, the Proprietor of M/s.Maya Trading Co., under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with proviso to the Section

A and Others (Appellants) (Fc) and Others Vs. Secretary of State for t ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Right to Information

appointed to represent. 7. The rules applicable to these appeals are the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Procedure) Rules 2003 (SI 2003/1034). Part 3 of the Rules governs appeals under section 25 of the 2001 Act. In response … the statement, but was clear (para 60 of the judgment) that the common law and domestic statute law (section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984) gave effect to the intent of article 15 of the