Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 74 · Page 1 of about 389 results (0.092 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 20 2014

La Cast Metals and Components Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. M/s. Kajal Dev ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

loss suffered would have to be proved by the party claiming it under Section 73 of the Act. Section 74 is in nature of an exception. If the parties quantified the loss that they would suffer and mention

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2014

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-28-2014

Subject : Education

The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2019

Union of India vs.m/s Om Construction Co.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

was 19th October, 2001 and stipulated date of completion was 18th April, 2003. However, the actual date, when the completion of work took place, was … 4 SCC13643. On a conspectus of the above authorities, the law on compensation for breach of contract Under Section 74 can be stated to be as follows:1. Where a sum is names in a contract as a liquidated … PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act challenges award dated 3rd May, 2009 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator.2. The Respondent - M/s. Om Construction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 01 2014

The Director Vs. the Central

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-2014

Subject : Education

has issued a show cause notice on 22.4.2009 under Section 17 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (for brevity, "the Act") relating to the change of trust. A reply was given on 14.5.2009 informing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2013

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Jul-10-2013

Subject : Electricity

the PPA however, was not adopted by the State Commission in terms of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. But, the PPA was forwarded by the Appellant to the State Commission along with a covering letter on … (i.e. variable charge for the unit delivered into the grid + the proportionate fixed charge with respect to 74.4 MW) apparently, 74.4 MW is the Gas turbine generator capacity. (ii) Petitioner shall comply with backing down instruction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … 394; Bipromasz Birpron Trading Sa v. Bharat Electronics Ltd. [2012] 5 SCR 743 : (2012) 6 SCC 384; Union of India v. Singh Builders Syndicate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2012

City Municipal Corporation of Chennai Rep. by Its Commissioner 'Ripon ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-24-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

agreement with the plaintiff Corporation. However, by a letter dated 22.10.1996, the defendant raised a doubt about the actual number of poles available in some of the roads and contended that the actual poles available were only … and a demand for payment of the licence fee together with interest and advertisement tax leviable as per Section 129-A and 129-B of Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 was made. Though the receipt of the letter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2014

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2006

Sebi Vs. Galaxy Broking Limited

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jan-24-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Galaxys books Connection 603/B, Shree Vishal Complex, Narsing lane, Malad (West) Mumbai- 400064 Co- acquired Millennium Cybertech in 2003 -B, Empire Building, Cumballa Hill, Kemps Corner, Mumbai- 400 036 Co- acquired Millennium Cybertech in 2003 633/634 ,PJ … been conducted by SEBI, BSE and NSE. Based on the findings of these preliminary investigations SEBI has taken action under the powers vested in it under Sections 11B and 11(4)(b)of the SEBI Act 1992 in cases where … investigations SEBI has taken action under the powers vested in it under Sections 11B and 11(4)(b)of the SEBI Act 1992 in cases where the price

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2004

Shalimar Video Company, Rep. by Its Partner Mr. Mohd. Ashraf Vs. Divya ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : PropertyIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 19(2) and 51; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 73 and 74; Civil Practice Rules - Rule 32; Cinematograph Act - Sections 2; Bombay Cinemas (Regulations) Act, 1953; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 24

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD447; 2004(6)ALT244

sides. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 30-04-2004, in O.S. No. 183 of 2003, passed by the IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,(Fast Track Court) Hyderabad. 3. The appellant is the … Nagireddy was seriously ill and in a state of invalidation. 48. This contingency has been met with by Section 74 of the Trusts Act. Section 74 of the Trusts Act deals with the power of the Court to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial