Advanced Search Results

Sonal Apparel Private Ltd., Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

dated 30.12.2015 CAS No.292669009 vide Annexure-C issued under Section 39(1) read with Section 72(2) and 36(1) of the Act, 2003 and etc; IN W.P.Nos.3104-3115 OF2016BETWEEN: Ingram Micro India Private Limited, No.12, SG Business Center, New Hosur Road, Wilson

Bimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of

Sri Bireswar Das Mohapatra and anr. Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Orissa

Subject : Banking

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 439, 442, 444, 446, 529A, 536(2) and 537; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72 and 72A; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 20, 34, 34(1) and 34(2); Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 20(4), 22, 22A and 32; Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Rules; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 198(13); Constitution of Indi

Reported in : 2006(II)OLR423

Managing Director and Director of M/s. East End Engineers (P) Ltd., which is a Company under the Companies Act and the loanee from the Bank.2. The material facts of the case are the said Company, namely, M/s. … the said company was declared sick and under the provisions of SICA the BIFR made a recommendation under Section 20 of SICA for its winding up. On the basis of such recommendation by the BIFR, winding up … of a sick industrial company with another company, the provisions of Section 72A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), shall, subject to the

Government of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionSales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(1), 9(2) to 9(4), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to (9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79(1); Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2006; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rule; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : ILR2009KAR633

all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act] and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have … the penalty orders, which penalty has been imposed on the petitioners under the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 72 of the Act. Such penalty is levied on the petitioners either for their failure to file returns of

Philips Electronics India Ltd. Reptd. by Its Manager - Corporate Fisca ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 12(1), 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : 2009(3)AIRKarR1; AIR2009NOC2187

all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have … the penalty orders, which penalty has been imposed on the petitioners under the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 72 of the Act. Such penalty is levied on the petitioners either for their failure to file returns of

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … the latter decision, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that the State Govt. had no power under Section 72 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act to review its previous order, yet their Lordships

First Global Stockbroking (P) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Mum.)173

the assessee and on analysis of the seized material learned AO framed the assessment order on 13th June, 2003 and determined the undisclosed income of the assessee for the block period as under: 18 Subject to the … directors in Buffalo Networks (P) Ltd. having shareholding of 26 per cent (approx.) in the company.Search and seizure action under Section 132--A search operation under Section 132(1) of the IT Act was conducted at various offices and … per share to the following companies.3. First Global Stock Broking (P) Ltd. 72,680 (retained with them)4. Other clients 2,520 (correct figure is 22,520) ___________ The

Philips Electronics India Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : [2009]20STT314

all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, 'the Act'] and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have … the penalty orders, which penalty has been imposed on the petitioners under the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 72 of the Act. Such penalty is levied on the petitioners either for their failure to file returns of

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi [1981] 2 SCR 79 : (1981) 1 SCC 722; K L Tripathi v. State Bank of India [1984] 1 SCR [2024]

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the PPA however, was not adopted by the State Commission in terms of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. But, the PPA was forwarded by the Appellant to the State Commission along with a covering letter on … the contract existing between the parties especially when there is no amendment to the said existing contract. (f) Section 72 of the Contract Act specifically provides that any payment made by the parties by mistake of fact can