Advanced Search Results

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

its power conferred by Section 58 of the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, a provision similar to sections 68 and 178 of The Electricity Act, 2003. None of the other decisions cited at the bar deal with … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Vineet Bhardwaj vs Registrar of Cooperative Society & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

has final authority to say in the functioning of the societies appropriately in accordance with the provisions of the DCS Act, 2003 and DCS Rules2007. The then President and the members of theManaging Committee had acted upon on behalf of … Accordingly, when the concerned flat was not allotted to the Petitioner,the Petitioner filed a claim for arbitration under Section 70 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 (hereinafter “DCS Act”) which was referred to a Sole Arbitrator.

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

Rules relate to the works of licensees pertaining to the distribution and supply of electricity to the consumers. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 enables the appropriate Government to grant approval regarding overhead lines. Section 185 of … filed counter affidavit. According to the respondent Electricity Board, as per Sections 164 and 185(2)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Board has the power of the 'Telegraph Authority' under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, with regard to

Sarvjit Singh Sareen Vs. Mrs. Ritu Menon and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 63, 87, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120and 138; Evidence Act 1872 - Sections 68; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition Act - Sections 169; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 19 and 21; Hindu Law

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT242

attesting witness, Mr. Navneet Bansal in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872. It is urged that the contents of the Will in fact would

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003 Dated 11th March, 2003 To, Shri P. V. Deshmukh, Dy. Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra, Urban Development … the Development Plan of Mumbai Backbay Reclamation area under Section 37(2) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 as regards change in the width of the Prakash Pethe Marg. By virtue of this modification, the … Javed(Supra), Shiv Raj(Supra), and Automotive Tyre Mfgrs. Assocn.(Supra). In the case of Gullapalli Nageswararao(Supra), the Apex Court considered Section 68-D(2) which provided that the State Government may, after considering the objections and after giving an opportunity to the

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … of 1894) as amended by Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1894 (Central Act 68 of 1984). G.O.Ms.No.2003, Revenue, dated 13.12.1984, reads as follows: AUTHORISATION OF OFFICERS … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in

Jivaji Framroze Tarachand (since deceased) through his Lrs. and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

case of Janaki Narayan Bhoir Vs. Narayan Namdeo Kadam 2003 (2) SCC 1991 and would submit that under section 68 of the Evidence Act if one of the attesting witness examined does not satisfy the requirements of attestation

Will of B.Chengalvalli vs V.Meera

Court : Chennai

was examined as P.W.2 has stated in his evidence that he did not attest the Will. As per Section 68 of the Evidence Act, the Will is required to be attested and has to be proved by examining

Jasmail Kaur Vs. Punjab State Election Commission and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Election

Reported in : (2009)3PLR793

the petitioner relied upon a Division Bench decision of this Court in Kashmir Kaur v. State of Punjab 2003 (2) P.L.J. 489. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that Section 68 of the … to declare the result 'by draw of lots', in stead of 'by way of toss', as provided under Section 68 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Election Commission Act'). Thereafter, on

M. Vijayalakshmi and Another Vs. Sadhu A.N. Sircar Foundation, Rep.by ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

or recall and annul the grant of Letters of Administration granted to the 1st respondent in TOS.No.23 of 2003 dated 29.08.2008.) 1. The captioned application has been filed by the third party to revoke or recall and … used in evidence. It was expounded that on a combined reading of Section 63 of the Act and Section 68 of the 1872 Act, it was apparent that mere proof of signature of the testator on the will