Advanced Search Results

Sh. Sanjay Chiripal Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Co-operative Societies

Acts : Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 - Sections 116, 62, 67, 61(1); Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 - Rule 22

this a merely a technical irregularity which is fully cured by the provisions contained in Section 39 of the DCS Act, 2003. Moreover, there is no such instance in case of the present Managing Committee and as such no cause … of the society, could be directed to be taken by the Registrar in exercise of his powers under Section 67 of the DCS Act. In other words, the Registrar continues to be empowered to issue appropriate directions in

M/S. Sri Vignesh Yarns Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director Sri. T ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

more in the nature of execution of a decision taken under Section 10 of the Act or under Section 67 or 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Therefore, when the experts namely the officials of the Board took … second route. According to the respondents, the District Collector had exercised his jurisdiction under the Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 and hence, it was not open to the writ petitioners to now challenge the impugned order, especially when

Vellaichamy Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

more in the nature of execution of a decision taken under Section 10 of the Act or under Section 67 or 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Therefore, when the experts namely the officials of the Board took … tension tower in Survey No.347, Alamarathupatti, Aravakuruchi Taluk, Karur District, without following the procedure established by the Electricity Act, 2003 and Telegraph Act, 1885. For Petitioner ... Mr.A.Abdul Kadhar for M/s.Eddy and Embboss Law Firm For Respondents ...

Brushabha Pradhan Vs. State and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 (for short, “the 2006 Rules,”.) framed under Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Grievance of the petitioner is that he owns land comprising of several plots including plot No.712, which has

The Chairman, Tantransco, Chennai Vs. the District Collector, Thiruval ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

more in the nature of execution of a decision taken under Section 10 of the Act or under Section 67 or 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Therefore, when the experts namely the officials of the Board took … the scheme through G.O.Ms.No.102, Energy Department, dated 10.12.2009 as provided under Sections 68 and 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner is exercising the power, which the Telegraph Authority possess under the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 under

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … Electricity Act, 2003 which also provides that appropriate Government may vest powers of Telegraph Authority with the licensee. Section 67(1) of Electricity Act, 2003 inter alia provides that a licensee may lay down or place electric supply lines.

S.A. Hakim Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

provides for revision before the State Government. The parimateria provision to Section 12 of the 1910 Act is Section 67 of the 2003 Act. Section 51 of the 1910 Act overrides Section 12 of the 1910 Act. Under … Licensee in the capacity of State Transmission Utility as envisaged under Sections 39 and 40 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 (in short '2003 Act'). Under Section 164 of the 2003 Act, the appropriate Government (the State Government herein)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

for the district of columbia No. 02-1674. Argued September 8, 2003-Decided December 10, 2003 The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), which amended the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), the Communications Act of 1934, … Officeholders The final provision of Title I is new FECA §323(f). 2 U. S. C. A. §441i(f) (Supp. 2003). Section 323(f) generally prohibits candidates for state or local office, or state or local officeholders, from spending soft money … greater solicitation allowances do not render §323(d)’s solicitation restriction facially invalid. Pp. 67-71. (2) Section 323(d)’s restriction on donations to qualifying §501(c) or §527 organizations

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 14.05.2003 District Revenue Officer, Salem Pronounced by me in the Open Court. This 14th day of May 2003. Sd/- on 14.05.2003 Special Tahsildar (L.A.) Neighbourhood Scheme, Salem 636 008. H2/11310/03, dated .05.2003 The Draft Award for … for R1 to R3 Mr.R.V.Babu for R4 ORDER Acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, issued in G.O.Ms.No.146, Housing and Urban Development and G.O.Ms.No.147, Housing and Urban Development (I.A.IV(2), dated 29.03.2000, published in … 0.89 Rs.281195 281161 Diff of Rs.34 due to clerical error corrected 4 67/1C054 Rs.134419 Deleted Diff of Rs.16 due to clerical error corrected 5 67/2

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … SCC 337; State of UP v. Babu Ram Upadhya [1961] 2 SCR 679; Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Municipal Board [1965] 1 SCR 970