Advanced Search Results
Sh. Sanjay Chiripal Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and ors.
Delhi
May-10-2011
Co-operative Societies
Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 - Sections 116, 62, 67, 61(1); Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 - Rule 22
this a merely a technical irregularity which is fully cured by the provisions contained in Section 39 of the DCS Act, 2003. Moreover, there is no such instance in case of the present Managing Committee and as such no cause … of the society, could be directed to be taken by the Registrar in exercise of his powers under Section 67 of the DCS Act. In other words, the Registrar continues to be empowered to issue appropriate directions in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. P.I. Marketing (P) Ltd., vs State of Kerala,
Kerala
Feb-07-2022
Pleader V K Shamsudheen for parties.2. M/s. P.I. Marketing (P) Ltd/a dealer registered underthe Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003 (for short, 'the Act'), assails the common order dated 30.12.2017 in T.A (VAT) No.1360 of 2011 and T.A … ledgers, documents etc. from the dealer. Thereafter, referring to a few omissions and commissions, -5- warranting action under Section 67 of the Act, since are noticed, penalty proceedings were initiated under Section 67 of the Act. The insinuation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. P.I.Marketing (P) Ltd. vs the State of Kerala
Kerala
Feb-07-2022
Pleader V K Shamsudheen for parties.2. M/s. P.I. Marketing (P) Ltd/a dealer registered underthe Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003 (for short, 'the Act'), assails the common order dated 30.12.2017 in T.A (VAT) No.1360 of 2011 and T.A … ledgers, documents etc. from the dealer. Thereafter, referring to a few omissions and commissions, -5- warranting action under Section 67 of the Act, since are noticed, penalty proceedings were initiated under Section 67 of the Act. The insinuation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.Markkannathas, Vs The District Collector
Chennai
Jun-01-2026
and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, read with Sections 67, 68 and 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003. By the said order, the first respondent grantedpermission to the sixth respondent to carry out works relating to … petitioners have challenged the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by thefirst respondent in exercise of powers purportedly conferred under Sections 10 and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, read with Sections 67, 68 and 164 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Sri Vignesh Yarns Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director Sri. T ...
Chennai
Nov-16-2012
Land Acquisition
more in the nature of execution of a decision taken under Section 10 of the Act or under Section 67 or 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Therefore, when the experts namely the officials of the Board took … second route. According to the respondents, the District Collector had exercised his jurisdiction under the Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 and hence, it was not open to the writ petitioners to now challenge the impugned order, especially when
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVellaichamy Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu,
Chennai
Aug-22-2014
Land Acquisition
more in the nature of execution of a decision taken under Section 10 of the Act or under Section 67 or 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Therefore, when the experts namely the officials of the Board took … tension tower in Survey No.347, Alamarathupatti, Aravakuruchi Taluk, Karur District, without following the procedure established by the Electricity Act, 2003 and Telegraph Act, 1885. For Petitioner ... Mr.A.Abdul Kadhar for M/s.Eddy and Embboss Law Firm For Respondents ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajamma vs the Managing Director
Karnataka
Jun-08-2026
lines over the subject lands.4. Respondent No.2 had issued a Notification dated 13.12.2022under Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The English translation of the said notification is set out below: -4- "Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited C.I.N/U40109KA1999SGC025521
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrushabha Pradhan Vs. State and ors.
Orissa
Dec-12-2013
Land Acquisition
the Works of Licensees Rules, 2006 (for short, “the 2006 Rules,”.) framed under Section 67 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Grievance of the petitioner is that he owns land comprising of several plots including plot No.712, which has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chairman, Tantransco, Chennai Vs. the District Collector, Thiruval ...
Chennai
Nov-22-2012
Land Acquisition
more in the nature of execution of a decision taken under Section 10 of the Act or under Section 67 or 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Therefore, when the experts namely the officials of the Board took … the scheme through G.O.Ms.No.102, Energy Department, dated 10.12.2009 as provided under Sections 68 and 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner is exercising the power, which the Telegraph Authority possess under the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...
Chennai
Nov-29-2013
Land Acquisition
Government cannot be made applicable as it is not the appropriate Government under Section 2(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003:27. Section 68 of the Electricity Act, 2003 mandates that an overhead line … Electricity Act, 2003 which also provides that appropriate Government may vest powers of Telegraph Authority with the licensee. Section 67(1) of Electricity Act, 2003 inter alia provides that a licensee may lay down or place electric supply lines.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »