Advanced Search Results
Anjali Dabas & Ors. Vs.registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors
Delhi
Aug-11-2017
Land Acquisition
of a show cause notice issued under Section 66(2) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (in short „the DCS Act, 2003‟)addressed to the Ex-Chairman, Ex-Vice Chairman, Ex-Directors and CEO of the respondent No.3/Bank. The said proceedings were initiated in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBimal Kumar Jana vs Santa Dey & Ors
Delhi
Mar-12-2026
Land Acquisition
order dated 29th May 2015 it was heldthat the period of 180 days prescribed under Section 86(3) of the DCS Act, 2003 is mandatory and begins from the date of receipt of the expulsion resolution by the RCS. Failure of … show that theWP(C) 2819/ 2018 Page 4/24 proportionate co-share of Sh. Amal Kumar Dey in underlying land exceeded 66.72 sq. metres so as to attract Rule 25(1)(c) of the DCS Rules.9. It was further held that irrespective
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-08-2024
Arbitration
[2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641
and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … 10 SCR 1404; ONGC Ltd. v. Afcons Gunanusa JV [2022] 10 SCR 660 : (2024) 4 SCC 481; Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. v. Tuff Drilling
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kerala Roadways (P) Ltd., vs the Dy. Commissioner of Income
Chennai
Apr-07-2026
show that advance tax was paid in respect of the total income declared at Rs.1,68,90,172/- for the A.Y.2002- 2003 after taking in to account the TDS deducted. The appellant’s case is directly covered by the Hon’ble High … (3), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Respondent Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in I.T.(SS)A.No.87/MDS/2007 for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
May-06-2011
Land Acquisition
found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … 25.46 38.82 40.05 2. Pench 29.17 56.75 92.46 61.99 3. Bargi 69.16 43.30 38.32 48.78 4 Bansagar-1 96.46 66.03 80.92 80.05 5 Banasagar-II 44.75 43.43 47.42 45.26 6 Banasagar-III 72.36 49.20 60.97 60.03 7 Banasagar-IV 0.00 0.00
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s.Progen Renewables Ltd Vs The Power Grid corporation
Chennai
Mar-09-2026
against the 6 th respondent’s Load Flow Study dated 27.11.2025 and without following the provisions of the Electricity act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885.For Petitioner : Mr.V.C.Janarthanan for Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, ASGI 1 to … to remove the solar panels which is arbitrary and without the authority.8. The petitioner would submit that under Section 16 of theIndian Telegraph Act, 1885 as and when a landowner raises objections, the District Collector is required
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Oct-04-2012
Electricity
Appellant’s Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … (3) of section 64; (zi) the manner by which development of market in power including trading specified under section 66; (zj) the powers and duties of the Secretary of the State Commission under sub-section (1) of section 91;
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEscotel Mobile Communication Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-20-2007
Sales Tax/VAT
(2007)148PLR170; (2007)9VST382(P& H)
Act'). Subsequently, it has been registered, after the repeal of the Act, under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for brevity, 'the VAT Act'). The assessee-petitioner is engaged in the business of mobile telecommunication and is a … value of SIM card, activation charges could not be included.3. The assessee-petitioner placing reliance on the provisions of Section 43 of the Act and Rules 35 and 38 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 (for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction
Oct-04-2012
Electricity
Appellants Captive Power Plant (CPP) to consumers other than the captive use is not permissible under Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and accordingly the Appellant should either take distribution license from the Commission under section 12 or seek exemption … (3) of section 64; (zi) the manner by which development of market in power including trading specified under section 66; (zj) the powers and duties of the Secretary of the State Commission under sub-section (1) of section 91;
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe National Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Laxmibai W/O Yallappa Bilagi
Karnataka Gulbarga
Jun-10-2014
Land Acquisition
within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 or such a carriage falling under Sub-Section 3 of Section 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The policy does not cover use for a. Organised Racing b. Pace
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »