Advanced Search Results

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … OnLine SC 10; G Sarana v. University of Lucknow [1977] 1 SCR 64 : (1976) 3 SCC 585; Union of India v. B N Jha … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

Commission) determining ARR and retail tariff for FY 2011-12 in exercise of powers under Section 61, 62 and 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003 contrary to the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003, National Tariff Policy, Bihar Electricity … The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Airports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Municipalities

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 68(1), 103, 69, 71, 64(a)(b), 84; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 126; Constitution of India - Article 226

2003 raised by the DCB calling upon AAI to pay Rs. 20,12,06,539/- as house tax under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (CA, 1924) for the period 1st April 1998 to 31st May 2002. 2. On 26th May 2003, … there was no reason to adopt any different value. (iii) The use of word let or rent in Section 64 (b) of the CA, 1924 did not limit the scope of the DCB to levy tax only on

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … reported in (1989) 4 SCC 187, (e) .M.U. Sinai Vs Union of India and Ors (1972) 2 SCR 640, (f) Vinod Seth v/s Devinder Bajaj and another reported in (2010) 8 SCC 1 (g) Padam Sen v/s

The State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Radheshyam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

are as under:1. 3.1. A Notification dated 27.02.2004 u/s 4(1) read with Section 17(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “the act”) was published in the official gazette for acquisition of land admeasuring … Ramkunwarbai, sold 0.011 hectare out of Rakba 0.109 hectare in Village Sala to the buyer kamal for Rs. 64,000. It was submitted that the sale price of the land Ex P2 to P4 (the small plots) mentioned

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Chennai vs M/S.T.N.S.S.Steels Pvt ...

Court : Chennai

accepting the highest bid for vessel "M.V. Island Pride”, the defendant filed a writ petition in W.P.No.14568 of 2003 challenging the letter of the plaintiff dated 31.01.2003 and obtained a stay subject to a condition of payment … forward to settle the dues of the Port Trust, the plaintiff had no other alternate except to invoke Section 64 of the Major Port Trust's Act 1963 and Regulation 4(5) of Madras Port Trust (Distraint / Arrest &

M/s.Progen Renewables Ltd Vs The Power Grid corporation

Court : Chennai

against the 6 th respondent’s Load Flow Study dated 27.11.2025 and without following the provisions of the Electricity act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885.For Petitioner : Mr.V.C.Janarthanan for Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, ASGI 1 to … to remove the solar panels which is arbitrary and without the authority.8. The petitioner would submit that under Section 16 of theIndian Telegraph Act, 1885 as and when a landowner raises objections, the District Collector is required … 2016 M/s.Progen Renewables Ltd., 87-A, First Floor, Muniappan Kovil Street, Ganapathy, Coimbatore 641 006, Rep by its Authorized Signatory, T.Manickavasagam ...Petitioner -vs1. The Power Grid

Sri.n.p.amrutesh Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the total population of the State.3. Litigational trend. District Subordinate Courts: As on at the end of February, 2003, the following were the pendencies in the subordinate Courts in the State of Karnataka. Karnataka North Karnataka (27 … India provides for establishment of Benches of High Court for convenience of litigant public. He further contended that Section 64 of the States Reorganization Act is meant only for practice and procedure, and Section 17 of Mysuru Act

Laxmibai and Others Vs. Shantappa P. Kamat and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Box. No.9229, Kolkata-700071 NATIONAL, INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BIJAPUR BD S.S.CROSS ROAD, BIJAPUR-586101 CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF COMPLIANCE OF SECTION 64 VB OF INSURANCE ACT 1938 Re: Policy No:602601/47/03/6300192 Insured : SRI SHANTAPPA P. KAMAT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a) Date of

Laxmibai and Others Vs. Shantappa P. Kamat and Others

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

Subject : Land Acquisition

Box. No.9229, Kolkata-700071 NATIONAL, INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BIJAPUR BD S.S.CROSS ROAD, BIJAPUR-586101 CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF COMPLIANCE OF SECTION 64 VB OF INSURANCE ACT 1938 Re: Policy No:602601/47/03/6300192 Insured : SRI SHANTAPPA P. KAMAT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a) Date of