Advanced Search Results

In the Matter Of: Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Ltd Vs. Madhya ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

seeking for the approval and adoption of tariff for procurement of power under section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 from two bidders namely Reliance Power Limited and Essar Power Limited who had submitted offer for supply of

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Mb Power (madhya Pradesh) Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

the Competitive Bidding Guidelines 3 (hereinafter referred to as “the Bidding Guidelines”) under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “the Electricity Act”). The objective of the said Bidding Guidelines is for introduction of

Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited., Hyderabad and Others Vs. Karnataka Electric ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : MRTP

this issue, has erroneously held that the PPA executed pursuant to the power purchase made in accordance with Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and as such, it does not require to be approved by the State … the procurement in question comes within the ambit of Section 79 (1) (b) and (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and so, the Central Commission alone has got the jurisdiction. (b) The Second Issue is as to whether

Jivaji Framroze Tarachand (since deceased) through his Lrs. and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

113. Reliance is placed on paragraph 11 of the said judgment. 59. It is submitted that requirement of section 63 of the Evidence Act are not atisfied. The evidence led by the plaintiff itself is unreliable, full of … place and from there their friendship developed. Jimmy used to come to her house sometime in or about 2003-04. When witness was asked whether she and Jimmy were good friends, in reply to question No.108 she replied

M/S D B Masur Engineers and Contractors, vs the Joint Commissioner of ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

there is an alternate and statutory remedy -5- of filing an appeal before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal under Section 63 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Hence, I declined to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction.6. Resultantly, … Issue a Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned Rectification Order passed under Section 69(1) of the KVAT Act, 2003 passed by respondent No.2, Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit 3), Navanagar, Hubballi on 13.10.2021 under his No.DCCT/ADT-3/HBL/AO/VAT/2020-21

M/S. Reliance Power Limited, Vs. Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

proposal to the UP State Commission. ii) On 19/1/05, the Central Government under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 notified the guidelines for determination of tariff by the bidding process for procurement of power by the distribution

N.C.Mohandas vs N.C.Aravindakshan

Court : Kerala

was examined, his status is not that of an attesting witness in tune with the statutory mandate under Section 63(c) of the Succession Act and as such the Courts below went wrong in relying on the evidence of

N.C.Aravindakshan vs N.C.Mohandas

Court : Kerala

was examined, his status is not that of an attesting witness in tune with the statutory mandate under Section 63(c) of the Succession Act and as such the Courts below went wrong in relying on the evidence of

N C Mohandas vs C Aravindakshan

Court : Kerala

was examined, his status is not that of an attesting witness in tune with the statutory mandate under Section 63(c) of the Succession Act and as such the Courts below went wrong in relying on the evidence of

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

process of bidding in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Central Government as per the provisions of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 3. Norms of Operation to be threshold norms 3.1 For removal of doubts, … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue