Advanced Search Results

H.K. Madhia Vs. Financial Commissioner and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

manner. One of the main contention of the petitioner is that RCS had no power u/s 41 of the DCS Act, 2003 and Rule 19 and 25 of the DCS Rules, 2007 to cease his membership. Further, that RCS has … of the DCS Act, 2003 and inquiry by Sh. P.C. Jain u/s 62(2) of the DCS Act, 2003 was ordered on 15/10/2009. Since both the … This was, complains the petitioner, totally overlooked by the lower authorities. The proceedings conducted by the Registrar under Section 41 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 read with Rule 19 and 25 of Delhi Cooperative Societies

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Education

Transmission, Distribution and Commercial losses of the Board, which is in consonance with the national Tariff Policy and Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003. 14.4 It would be relevant to quote Clause 8.3(2) of the National Tariff … The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in

Sh. Sanjay Chiripal Vs. Registrar Co-operative Societies and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Co-operative Societies

Acts : Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 - Sections 116, 62, 67, 61(1); Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 2007 - Rule 22

this a merely a technical irregularity which is fully cured by the provisions contained in Section 39 of the DCS Act, 2003. Moreover, there is no such instance in case of the present Managing Committee and as such no cause … of the Inquiry Officer (in short 'I.O.') dated 15.01.2008 submitted by one D.P. Dwivedi, while conducting proceedings under Section 62 of the DCS Act. 2. It is important to note that the upshot of the impugned order of

Bihar Industries Association Sinha Library Road Vs. Bihar Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

is discriminatory and is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as well as contrary to Section 62 (3) and Section 45 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Secondly in allowing the premium on consumes in notified … Surendra Kumar, Judicial Member. 1. This is an Appeal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 filed by the appellant Bihar Industries Association against the order dated 15.03.2013 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

and extent of application 2.1 These Regulations shall apply in all cases of determination of Generation Tariff under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for supply of electricity to a Distribution Licensee, but shall not apply where … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Kerala Roadways (P) Ltd., vs the Dy. Commissioner of Income

Court : Chennai

show that advance tax was paid in respect of the total income declared at Rs.1,68,90,172/- for the A.Y.2002- 2003 after taking in to account the TDS deducted. The appellant’s case is directly covered by the Hon’ble High … (3), Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent/Respondent Tax Case Appeal has been filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in I.T.(SS)A.No.87/MDS/2007 for the

In the Matter Of: Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Ltd Vs. Madhya ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

seeking for the approval and adoption of tariff for procurement of power under section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 from two bidders namely Reliance Power Limited and Essar Power Limited who had submitted offer for supply of … the Electricity Act, 1002 provides as under: “63. Determination of tariff by bidding Process: Notwithstanding anything contained in section 62, the Appropriate Commission shall adopt the tariff if such a tariff has been determined through the transparent competitive

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

and Conciliation Act, 1996; Indian Contract Act, 1872; UNCITRAL Model Law; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Spanish Arbitration Act, 2003. In the Judgment of Hrishikesh Roy, J. Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; UNCITRAL Model Law; Arbitration Act, 1996. List … appointment of arbitrators. [Para 75] - [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application of Section 18 at the time … v. SAP India Pvt Ltd, 2023 INSC 1051 : [2023] 15 SCR 621; Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. [2016] 1 SCR

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

the PPA however, was not adopted by the State Commission in terms of Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. But, the PPA was forwarded by the Appellant to the State Commission along with a covering letter on … tariff determination has to be in terms of Section 63 of the Act and not as per the Section 62 of the Act. Therefore, the Regulations have no bearing on the project and the power supplied from the

Tata Power Company Ltd. Vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. and ors.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL405

the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court the issue needs to be decided as a tariff issue under Section 62 of Electricity Act 2003. Point "A" While disposing the Appeal arising from SLP No. 4899 of 2005 the … 1956. The Appellant is a generating company within the meaning of Clause (28) of Section 2 of Electricity Act, 2003 and also Clause (4A) of Section 2 and a bulk licensee within the meaning of Sub-section (3) of