Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the dcs act 2003 section 59 · Page 1 of about 497 results (0.107 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 2017

Archit Shukla & Ors vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies, Govt. ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted … were excluded on the ground that they had not completed the mandatory one year period as per Rule 59 (k) of DCS Rules.4. The decision taken by Sh. S.M. Aggarwal, Retired ADJ, Delhi was challenged by some

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2017

Shri Khiya Ram Khilwani & Anr vs.registrar of Cooperative Societie ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

respondent No.1/RCS appointed Sh. Dayal Singh, Asstt. Labour Commissioner (Retd.) as an Inspecting Officer under Section 61 of DCS Act 2003 to look into various issues including the validity of 55 members enrolled during the year 2008-09. He submitted … were excluded on the ground that they had not completed the mandatory one year period as per Rule 59 (k) of DCS Rules.4. The decision taken by Sh. S.M. Aggarwal, Retired ADJ, Delhi was challenged by some

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2005

Kedia Overseas Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 17, 18, 28(1), 46, 47, 47(1), 58, 58(1), 59, 59(1), 59(3), 68, 130, 130(1), 130(6) and 142; Central Excise Act - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules - Rule 9B; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD873

from every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal on or after the 1st day of July, 2003 (not being an order relating, among other things, to the determination of any question having a relation to … sum of Rs. 39.8 lakhs only, (and not Rs. 49.8 lakhs), as security for the bond executed under Section 59(1) of Customs Act towards duties and interest payable on imported Crude Palmolein stored in the warehouse tanks, these

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 2017

Shahank Jain vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-2017

Subject : Right to Information

complaints dated 03.10.2016, 25.10.2016, 16.01.2017 and 17.01.2017 as also a petition filed by him under Section 41 of the DCS Act, 2003 (Annexure V), praying inter alia for restraining Shri Vinod Jain from holding the office of a Director on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2013

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd Vs. Ppn Power G ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Entitlement of the Appellant to Rebate (b) Jurisdiction of the State Commission u/s 86 (1) (f) of the Act, 2003; (c) First In First Out method; for adjustment of payment; (d) Limitation, delay and latches; (e) Bar under … case?”. 40. We have considered the submissions of both the parties on this issue. According to the Appellant, Section 59 of the Contract Act should apply. On the other hand, the Respondent submits that Section 60 and 61

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2011

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-06-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

with the ‘power to remove difficulties’(Regulation 57), ‘power to amend’ (Regulation 58) and inherent power of Commission (Regulation 59) in the context of the exercise of regulatory power to determine the tariff for the electricity utilities namely … found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2009

Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Now Known as Jsw Steel Ltd. Rep. by It ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-05-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 13, 17A, 17(4), 18 and 30; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3(1); Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 4; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 39; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 21, 31, 31B, 31C, 39, 47, 48A, 51A, 226 and 227; Constitution of India (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1975 - Article 31B; Constitution of India (Twent

Reported in : 2009(4)KCCR2566(D.B)

consider its revision petition. But the Central Government rejected the revision petition filed by SMIORE on 29th July, 2003, and therefore, the writ petition No. 22767 of 2002 filed by SMIORE was also dismissed on 4th February, … be considered for grant of mining lease under Section 11(2) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, (for short 'MMDR Act') as, such application is premature and shall not be entertained as per Rule … substantial development of the State and quash the notification made under Rule 59(1) of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (for short 'MC Rules') notifying the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2024

Shri Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Chief Minister, in the Council of Ministers in any State at the commencement of the Constitution (Ninety-first Amendment) Act, 2003 exceeds the said fifteen per cent or the number specified in the first proviso, as the case may … 12 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 59, 61, 62, 201, 227, 228, 229, 239, 314, 316(5), 318(1), 318(2), 318(3), … register complaints before the Commissioner of Police. This was in compliance with clause (1) of sub-section (2) of Section 154 of the Cr.P.C.. Even then, no action is taken. The 4th 99 respondent then approaches the Lokayukta

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2026

Sri Dhakshinamurthy Mutt Vs The Commissioner

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2026

whollyimpermissible. It is further submitted that the 4 th respondent has been performing the function of Madathipathi from 2003 to 2016, which would clearly indicate that it is not a temporary appointment of Madathipathi.43. It is the … been affirmed, but the removal of the 4th respondent as Madathipathi has been set aside by adverting to Section 59 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act (for short ‘the Act’) by holding that removal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2013

Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, Through Its Commissioner Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Dec-10-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Petitioner Municipal Corporation – a local authority constituted and functioning under the Bombay (Maharashtra) Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, ( hereafter 1949 Act and earlier known as Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act) in this petition under … for refusing the permission. Failure to communicate the decision either way results in grant of deemed sanction under Section 45 subsection 5. But then the language of first proviso to this subsection reveals that if the permission … necessary by the proposals made in the final development plan, and Section 59(1)(a) gives the purpose of the TP scheme viz. that it is for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial