Advanced Search Results

Anamalai Paper Mills Pvt., Ltd., Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Generation and

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

have retrospective effect.7. Further, it is submitted that in terms of Section 56(2) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter, it may be referred to as 'the Act'), the arrears of electricity consumption charges is recoverable within

Venkateshwara Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(1), 21, 22, 22A, 22B, 23, 24, 24(1), 51A and 53; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 56, 56(1) and 185(2); Electricity Rules - Rules 29 and 31; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2009Bom106

and such position of law continues to exist in the analogus provisions under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003; and as such under both the laws old as well as new there is no provision for permanent

Indu Sethia Vs. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Right to Information

the meter reading. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 226 Electricity Act, 2003 Section 56(1) Levy of Charges Petitioner was charged with hefty amount by Respondent against shortfall of current consumption arears

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Vs. Everest Tube Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

below that suit is not within limitation in view of Sub-section (2) of Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is not sustainable in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kusumam Hotels Private Limited

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … Monthly % MAY(WEF 08.05.09) June July CUM. YEARLY (%) 1. Gandhisagar 59.86 25.46 38.82 40.05 2. Pench 29.17 56.75 92.46 61.99 3. Bargi 69.16 43.30 38.32 48.78 4 Bansagar-1 96.46 66.03 80.92 80.05 5 Banasagar-II 44.75 43.43

Nand Kishor vs the Registrar of Cooperative Society & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the future. [...] (iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, the special order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

Madan Gopal Agarwal vs Registrar of Co-Opeartive Societies & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

The Naval Technical Officers Cghs Ltd vs the Registrar of Cooperative ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

Naval Technical Officers Co-Operative Group Housing Society Limited vs ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

cases for the future. [...](iv) In regard to the CBI investigated societies, thespecial order under Section 127 of the DCS Act, 2003 needs to also lay down that till such time as the particular society gets a clean chit from

Mumbai District Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Co-operative Bank Employees ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Steel Board and Anr. 2001 III CLR 560 (SC). (21) Arjun Dada Gadge Vs. Mallappa G. Chougule, AIR 2003 Bombay 441 (HC-Bom.). (22) Management of Sonepat Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Ajit Singh 2005 I LLJ 1122 … 5009. (16) Express Newspaper (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen AIR 1963 (SC) 569. (17) Management of Rangaswamy, 1990 II CLR 56. (18) Municipal Corporation of … of the Labour Court was passed on an Interim Application under Section 119 (D) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as "BIR Act") filed by the Respondent-Union seeking an order to restrain Respondent-Bank from